all depends on structure, frame size, bone density etc. example Lou was heavier than Arnold with his larger frame and bigger bones while Arnold was still thicker and denser holding more muscle on his frame with more detail.

awesome physique! always one of my favourites

 superb conditioning and wicked guns but i dont think he looks good. dodgy shape all over, esp the pecs.

exactly what I woulda said. spot on

bad delt/trap tie ins. he doesnt flow in this pose. for some reason i think if there is a lack of the long biceps vein it hurts this pose too.

I love how people comment like they are experts on every physique they see. fact is there are people who are pretty damn strong that dont look like they touch a weight. Some look strong but aren't. I'd say Jackmans numbers are easily possible. and while he might not be a massive bodybuilder he is solid with some decent muscle.
And I dont see his as an everyday physique either, those physiques are usually fat or skinny fat these days.

i think they look almost identical here.  and like someone else said both look dirty.

interesting advice but damn he looks like he never lifted before!

but he got a far better placing in 07 than in the comparison pic!...

he lost every quality he used to have!

looks like he started training his face too, it has alot more mass later on lol.

a little comparison here against his last Olympia showing.
What did he weigh in boths of these pics?
In the old shot his chest is clearly thicker, his lats have more flare and he is harder and dryer but has hardly any vasculrity. In the later shot he has the vascular look but is softer and glossy and much less defined.

very wide, always seemed to have a really skinny neck.

he even had flow and aesthetics. looks sharper and harder here than when he was his supposed best in 2001 and has decent size.

yes and his midsection actually looked hard and conditioned not glossy stretched and smooth.
The abs there had depth!

that was quick
1989, his abs looked almost normal here!

??

lady in the water, walked out of that one.
Burn after reading, top cast terrible film.

thats what I thought, haha

I think Dorian beats Ronnie at their bests, better conditioning and balance only giving up biceps to Ronnie.
For some reason though I dont think Dorian looks that great here, legs look very long and slender, chest is shallow and he doesnt seem to pop in the poses from the front. the back is top draw though as usual but the thighs seems to hurt the balance here too.

still not that good even here, some of the oddest looking abs ever, smooth and glossy. but yea he looked better before the gh gut, its a no brainer.

Hulkster please say you are joking here, seriously!?....

got a pic of him or Vin weasel flexing a bicep?

true, he looked awesome in universal soldier the return.

He looked best in blade 3 I think..