Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 395
|
|
7
|
Getbig Main Boards / Gossip & Opinions / Re: Gynecomastia
|
on: June 15, 2013, 02:58:13 PM
|
|
Also, the recovery process is not like it used to be with Vaser because of the small incision. You have it done Monday morning at 8, you are ok to go back to work Tuesday morning. (most jobs that is, anything requiring labor isn't). You have to wear a compression vest for 1-3 weeks depending on your recovery process. (Doc will see you about 72 hours post surgery and then in another week to monitor.)
The process of using drainage plugs is being phased out now as well. So no leaks for some people.
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Getbig Main Boards / Gossip & Opinions / Re: Gynecomastia
|
on: June 15, 2013, 02:54:43 PM
|
No such thing, part of the gland always has to be left in or your nipple will invert.
Yep. If you have a moderate to severe case and take out the gland... there is nothing left under it but loose skin and the nipple will have a 80% chance of inverting. I don't know where you guys are going to pay those kind of prices (high) but here it should never be anymore than $5k. I know because my gf's father is one of the most sought after PS in South Florida. He has people coming all over the world to visit him. He would never take out the gland. He will sever all blood flow to it so that there is no chance of it returning. He uses Vaser technology that liquefies the fat and hard tissue before sucking it out. The incision is about 1/8th of an inch and is over in the crease of your arm pit. Also, a good plastic surgeon can easily get your insurance to pay for it. Claiming that it exists since puberty and now has grown bigger in the last year and is extremely painful. You would be looking at 1k in costs after the insurance picks up. He sees a vast majority of BBers and physique models coming in for this and for having Vaser abdominal sculpting done.
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Getbig Main Boards / Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Trayvon Martin - Gun, Drugs, Fighting
|
on: June 15, 2013, 05:42:19 AM
|
You mean the arrest for assualting an officer that was wiped from his record? But don't let the facts get in the way or anything.
It's not my liberty, property, money, etc. at stake, so I'll be just fine when the verdict comes back, whatever it is. And I have no idea what the jury is going to do. I just find the case extremely interesting and will continue to follow it.
Oh, didn't know that wiping it off his record actually changed the fact that it occurred. How's that work again? Time travel? Parallel universes? So your stance is that he did not assault a policeman simply because it was wiped off his record?
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Getbig Main Boards / Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Trayvon Martin - Gun, Drugs, Fighting
|
on: June 14, 2013, 06:54:33 PM
|
Who the heck are you? 240? Just make stuff up as you go along?
No, fiance is not a wife.
No, he was never arrested for domestic violence.
He and his girlfriend both filed restraining orders against each other. Both were granted. Sounds like a mutual stay-away.
But hey if that means = "a guy that has a history of beating his wife" to you, then more power to you.
Right... what else would domestic violence refer to? Perhaps that arrest for assaulting a police officer was something completely different too? It's going to break your little heart when the guilty verdict comes back.
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Getbig Main Boards / Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Trayvon Martin - Gun, Drugs, Fighting
|
on: June 14, 2013, 06:49:01 PM
|
maybe you missed it the national sheriffs association or whoever oversees neighbor hood watch orgs said they didnt have any record of him in a neighborhood watch....
and he clearly gave them directions to the mailbox he was near....
my point is both of them are fucktards and by trying to paint only one as a retard you give the other a pass. Both of these idiots were responsible for what happend that night and it was simply a situation where shit went wrong due to actions on both sides.
If you cant admit that then your just a fucking biased as jackass
Perhaps you can show me where I have given one fucktard a pass?
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Getbig Main Boards / Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Trayvon Martin - Gun, Drugs, Fighting
|
on: June 14, 2013, 06:44:24 PM
|
Absolutely false.
According to who? Oh gee... it's his fiancee... not his wife. That really changes his actions.  In August 2005, Zimmerman’s ex-fiancee, Veronica Zuazo, filed a civil motion for a restraining order alleging domestic violence. Zimmerman counterfiled for a restraining order against Zuazo. The competing claims were resolved with both restraining orders’ being granted. Apparently being arrested for domestic violence is pretty good proof that he was beating someone. Bottom line, he had anger management issues that only fed into his insecurity/inferiority complex.
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Getbig Main Boards / Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Trayvon Martin - Gun, Drugs, Fighting
|
on: June 14, 2013, 06:34:22 PM
|
LMFAO i couldnt give you my neighbor across the streets address other than the street, he did give the 911 operator(aka officer  ) the directions to get to him. youre also talking about a known drug abusing teen with a propensity to violence. if the jury weighs the evidence and finds him guilty thats fine but you retards are basing all your shit on "ifs" and extreme stretches of written law. how about we all just wait to condemn this guy until he is trial is over and verdict is in? I am sure you don't patrol your neighborhood on a daily basis like he did. Or if you can't give your neighbors address that is across the street, you are just stupid. Take your pick, doesn't really matter to me. And he clearly said that he didn't know where he was in the community. Yeah... that sounds like a real qualified neighborhood watch candidate. We are also talking about a known wannabe cop with anger management issues and a propensity to violence. So what is your point exactly?
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
Getbig Main Boards / Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Trayvon Martin - Gun, Drugs, Fighting
|
on: June 14, 2013, 06:23:50 PM
|
|
We are talking about a guy that has a history of beating his wife, sexually abusing his cousin, assaulting a police officer, and calling 911 almost 50 times in (what?) six months over stupid shit like trash in the road. Despite living in the community he was "patroling" as a busybody everyday, he could not give the operator the exact address where he was. Profiling a kid that he didn't even know and had not seen commit any crime and deciding to pursue him.
Does this sound like the actions of a sane man that wasn't seeking a conflict of some kind?
Really, what's the excuse going to be when he is found guilty?
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Getbig Main Boards / Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Dems 22 GOP 0
|
on: June 14, 2013, 06:15:25 PM
|
Ok that's fair. Liberals can keep their monopoly on intramural softball and running the country into the ground. We promise to focus on everything else.
Please do. Like regulating women's vaginas and what goes on in other people's bedrooms.
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Getbig Main Boards / Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Trayvon Martin - Gun, Drugs, Fighting
|
on: June 14, 2013, 03:19:08 PM
|
Myself, I think it's a matter of certain people feeling threatened by young black kids on a daily basis, and this case has become a vicarious outlet for them.
Exactly. Their insecurity/inferiority complex will not allow them to actually entertain the notion that perhaps Trayvon did nothing that warranted a death sentence at the hands of someone that clearly had anger management issues.
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
Getbig Main Boards / Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Trayvon Martin - Gun, Drugs, Fighting
|
on: June 14, 2013, 03:17:18 PM
|
The pro Ashtray crowd on the board seems to be suggesting that by virtue of questioning Martin and walking next to him, Zimmerman deserved to get his ass kicked. After all, Martin was not doing anything illegal. Zimmerman had it coming.
Here is the inverse application of the same logic: Martin deserved to be shot. After all, Zimmerman was not doing anything illegal. Martin attacked Zimmerman and Zimmerman defended himself. Martin had it coming.
The point of the matter is that you can't have it both ways. If the first set of circumstances fits, so does the second.
Perhaps. However I have never said that Trayvon didn't deserve to be shot. I have always said that this shouldn't be a case of Stand Your Ground law when it was Zimmerman that provoked the conflict by following this kid who was doing nothing more than minding his own business. Clearly if you are doing something that the other person may think is threatening to their safety, when they start whooping your ass then you just need to suck it up and take it. If Zimmerman wasn't trying to be a one man patrol unit, then neither of them would be where they are now.
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
Getbig Main Boards / Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Trayvon Martin - Gun, Drugs, Fighting
|
on: June 14, 2013, 01:08:02 PM
|
If Zimmerman had followed the ORDERS given to him by 911, Getbiggers would not be subjected to your retarded unintelligent posts regarding this case
Conclusion: 37,000 posts & you're still a fu&king moron
Don't forget the illogical conclusion and evidence that Trayvon broke drug laws THAT DAY as evident by the trace amounts of pot found in his system. Talk about a lynch mob... some on here just want Zimm to found innocent for no other reason than to justify their own biased viewpoint.
|
|
|
|
|