Have you not been watching dems the last decade?

Admittedly; some are insane in their economic beliefs I will not dispute. But I think they’re useful idiots; trotted out with insane things to say to test the temperature of the mouth breathing masses.

Just like republicans have their useful idiots.

The centers of decision making in both parties are more moderate. Blue and red alike.

Rob Sand (governor, iowa) presents a more palatable democratic centrist POV that will prove popular if he decides to run outside the state. As would Joe Lombardo (republican out of NV). These are examples of a more centrist mentality that will accelerate in America in the next decade.

The AOCs and Mamdanis don’t have much runway to work with for a variety of reasons. Theirs is a self limiting doctrine. Like sanders in KS and Stitt in OK.

America doesn’t work best in extremis. People inherently know this; they just want someone who will get work done in government. With approval ratings for congress (not blue or red….just “how does America think congress does for them”) at all time lows, congress itself has to try something new. People are tired of fighting their neighbors; they’re going to start fighting politicians and Washington can’t afford that. You can bet state governors will not hesitate to seize control if that’s the case.

And even the extremists do things you would not expect. DeSantis supports economic policy that heavily subsidizes post secondary education for Floridians, whilst a blue blooded dem (pritzker in IL) maintains policies that create some of the highest in state post secondary education costs. So there’s levels and layers and oddities even within the far extremes.

I think most Americans know a shitty deal when they see it though. Even Babies raised by wolves know when they’re being fed a raw deal (whether it’s a red or blue deal). And signs point to people being about fed up with dumb ideas on either side. Get work done, or fuck off, seems to be the flavor of the day. Red or blue; get work done. 

 

   

     I didn't know now I feel so bad.

This is why you are under discussion for another break. With the entire internet at your fingertips, you still spread daily lies.
Good luck!! May the mod council have mercy on what little soul you have left.

What Fact‑Checkers Found
PolitiFact reviewed the viral quote claiming Trump said, “Sure, I got deferments… would you really want a president who was dumb enough to let himself get drafted?” and determined it is completely fabricated
The quote circulated online with claims it came from an August 28, 2015 appearance on Meet the Press, but fact‑checkers found:
Meet the Press did not air on that date

Trump’s actual interviews on August 16, 2015 and August 28, 2016 contained no discussion of draft deferments

No transcript or recording shows Trump ever saying this at any time

Source
Where the Quote Really Came From
The only place the quote appears is in a satirical Yahoo! News column written by Matt Bai in 2016

Bai confirmed to PolitiFact that the piece was intended as satire and the quote was invented, not real

Women generally prefer slim ,fit men over chubbier or fatter men (PROOF) - Article showing what women rank as most attractive



When evaluating female attraction across population data, psychological studies, and social research, women overwhelmingly prefer an athletic, lean-to-moderately-muscular physique with a low body fat percentage and a prominent V-taper over a body carrying excess fat.

While personal preferences exist across a spectrum, broad preferences are driven by clear evolutionary, visual, and behavioral markers.

1. The Core Visual Cue: The Waist-to-Shoulder Ratio (V-Taper)
From a biological and evolutionary standpoint, human visual attraction relies heavily on structural ratios rather than raw scale on a weighing scale:

The Ideal Silhouette: Research consistently demonstrates that women rate physiques with a low waist-to-chest or waist-to-shoulder ratio as the most visually attractive. A lean, tight waist combined with developed shoulders and upper back signals physical capability, health, and athletic condition.

Why "Fatter" Bodies Rank Lower: Excess abdominal fat dilutes or completely erases the V-taper, creating a blocky or rounded midsection. In evolutionary psychology, higher visceral fat storage is subconsciously associated with metabolic dysfunction, lower testosterone levels, and reduced physical agility.

2. "Lean and Athletic" vs. "Massive Bodybuilder"
It is important to distinguish between being slim/conditioned and being an oversized bodybuilder:

The "Hollywood/Athletic" Ideal: Studies evaluating female preferences for male physiques show a clear peak favorability for the "lean and athletic" build—think a sprinter, fighter, or swimmer physique (roughly 10% to 14% body fat with visible muscularity and a tight waist).

Hyper-Massive Physiques: Extreme mass (heavy off-season bodybuilders carrying immense size or high body fat) often ranks lower in general female attraction studies than a sharp, aesthetic, medium-muscled physique.

3. The "Dad Bod" Myth vs. Reality
Media trends occasionally champion the "dad bod" (a slightly softer, bulkier physique), but observational research reveals how that trend is actually interpreted:

When women express appreciation for a "dad bod," they are typically describing a man who has an underlying foundation of muscle frame (broad shoulders, strong arms) carrying a mild, comfortable layer of fat—not a soft, untrained, or obese physique.

Furthermore, the preference for a softer physique in long-term relationships often stems from behavioral and social comfort (a partner who is relaxed, non-judgmental about food, and approachable) rather than pure, raw visual/sexual attraction.

Summary
If comparing a slim, lean, conditioned body with a tight waist against a fatter, softer body carrying excess body fat, the lean and athletic physique commands a massive advantage in visual attraction. A small waist, sharp proportions, and visible muscle density remain the universal standard of physical attraction.

Update on Trump canceling, interfering with, and/or doing crazy stuff for the midterms?

Trump rigged the midterms against himself so he could play 5D chess!!!

Steve Guest
@SteveGuest

Democrat Rep. Yassamin Ansari threatens members of the US military well below Secretary of War Pete Hegseth who followed lawful orders:

"I also think that people down the chain at the Pentagon who carried out these orders need to be investigated....

So that is why it's important for everyone, you know, who works for these individuals who are making these decisions, takes very seriously, you know, what the Constitution says and what types of orders they're being given. This is all very, very serious, and there is going to be a world beyond this administration."

https://x.com/SteveGuest/status/2120227687239188781