These kind of threads SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Since many people said Jay is worse than Yates,i created this thread.I saw with my own eye Nasser owned Dorian compretely from the front and glutes and hams.Only bodyparts of dorian better than nasser was his lat and back detail.Discuss.
Ya, it was close enough that there's no way Yates should've always won.
ha ha ha !!
Not even close. Nasser looks like a soggy towel.
dude nassers back is equally thick as dorians.dorian only had the upper hand on detail..nasser had all the size he needed to beat yates in the back poses but sucked on overall back conditioning
Well then anybody think this nasser is better than present Jay cutler?
It's actually quite close - both very big guys and have some outstanding bodyparts. Nasser did have a good back but his other bodyparts were so freaky that it made his back look ordinary - his hams are amazing in those photos and probably better than Jay's. Jay is probably wider and carries more quality mass but Nasser has achieved better conditioning in his prime than Jay has done so far - it's hard to tell with Jay though because he isn't very vascular and people mark him down for that for some reason even though something like that is strictly genetic. In answer to your question - Nasser has been bettter than Jay but look for Jay to keep improving.
I much prefer Jay before he started trying to look like Jean Pierre Fux.