Author Topic: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?  (Read 35285 times)

logical?

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #225 on: December 07, 2006, 03:59:27 PM »
I love the way that these turds, like Alexxx, that have never been onstage continually belittle others while singing their own praises so loudly that they are unable to hear the boos of the imaginary crowd.

Alexxx, put it onstage or shut your man-pleaser.

monster delusional argument. perhaps we should stop criticising NASA for the Challenger disaster because we haven't been to the moon? ::)

Triple-H_2005

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
  • I mostly lurk...
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #226 on: December 07, 2006, 04:13:19 PM »
monster delusional argument. perhaps we should stop criticising NASA for the Challenger disaster because we haven't been to the moon? ::)
Okay, how's this?

Alexxx, whether he has competed or not, is a real turd for coming on the boards and putting everyone down.  Some psychologists might argue that this is one of the most clearly-defined markers of low self-esteem.  Such a lack of self-seteem usually stems from not being loved enough by one's parents or being loved too much by another adult authority figure.

Further, the fact that Alexxx' arguments are neither fluid nor coherent, one can safely hypothesize a deficiency in his educational journey.  Now, whether this is to be blamed on the public school system cannot be ascertained, due to the fact that Alexxx has never included his educational credentials during any of his inane ramblings.

We may further extrapolate that Alexxx is a paranoid delusional, evidenced by his exaggerated sensitivity to rejection, resentfulness, distrust, as well as the inclination to distort experienced events; i.e. his training, intellectual and romantic prowess.

Please bear in mind that I do not consider Psychology a science... more a pseudo-science.

I hope that 'logical' approves of this 'monster' well thought-out assessment of Get Big's very own resident "Coo-coo for Cocoa Puffs" poster child.  Pardon me for not stating that in clinical terms.

Now, I'm going to write a letter to NASA, and give them a good tongue-lashing for that Challenger thing.

logical?

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #227 on: December 07, 2006, 04:31:40 PM »
Okay, how's this?

Alexxx, whether he has competed or not, is a real turd for coming on the boards and putting everyone down.  Some psychologists might argue that this is one of the most clearly-defined markers of low self-esteem.  Such a lack of self-seteem usually stems from not being loved enough by one's parents or being loved too much by another adult authority figure.

Further, the fact that Alexxx' arguments are neither fluid nor coherent, one can safely hypothesize a deficiency in his educational journey.  Now, whether this is to be blamed on the public school system cannot be ascertained, due to the fact that Alexxx has never included his educational credentials during any of his inane ramblings.

We may further extrapolate that Alexxx is a paranoid delusional, evidenced by his exaggerated sensitivity to rejection, resentfulness, distrust, as well as the inclination to distort experienced events; i.e. his training, intellectual and romantic prowess.

Please bear in mind that I do not consider Psychology a science... more a pseudo-science.

I hope that 'logical' approves of this 'monster' well thought-out assessment of Get Big's very own resident "Coo-coo for Cocoa Puffs" poster child.  Pardon me for not stating that in clinical terms.

Now, I'm going to write a letter to NASA, and give them a good tongue-lashing for that Challenger thing.



Alexxxx is a gimmick dude, just like 90% of the other posters on this site. Don't feed the troll  ;D




















And your original argument still sucks ;D

whateva

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1587
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #228 on: December 07, 2006, 05:00:26 PM »
fixed :)
Okay, how's this?

Adonis, whether he has competed or not, is a real turd for coming on the boards and putting everyone down.  Some psychologists might argue that this is one of the most clearly-defined markers of low self-esteem.  Such a lack of self-seteem usually stems from not being loved enough by one's parents or being loved too much by another adult authority figure.

Further, the fact that Adonis' arguments are neither fluid nor coherent, one can safely hypothesize a deficiency in his educational journey.  Now, whether this is to be blamed on the public school system cannot be ascertained, due to the fact that Adonis has never included his educational credentials during any of his inane ramblings.

We may further extrapolate that Adonis is a paranoid delusional, evidenced by his exaggerated sensitivity to rejection, resentfulness, distrust, as well as the inclination to distort experienced events; i.e. his training, intellectual and romantic prowess.

Please bear in mind that I do not consider Psychology a science... more a pseudo-science.

I hope that 'logical' approves of this 'monster' well thought-out assessment of Get Big's very own resident "Coo-coo for Cocoa Puffs" poster child.  Pardon me for not stating that in clinical terms.

Now, I'm going to write a letter to NASA, and give them a good tongue-lashing for that gravity suit thing.

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #229 on: December 07, 2006, 05:01:01 PM »
just push some weight!

Triple-H_2005

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
  • I mostly lurk...
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #230 on: December 07, 2006, 05:03:54 PM »
fixed :)
Yeah, that was kinda funny!

But, Adonis has never attacked me.  Alexxx did.  The funny thing is that his latest meltdown came on the heels of a post that made with legitimate compliments in it. 

Go figure.

logical?

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #231 on: December 07, 2006, 05:06:59 PM »
Yeah, that was kinda funny!

But, Adonis has never attacked me.  Alexxx did.  The funny thing is that his latest meltdown came on the heels of a post that made with legitimate compliments in it. 

Go figure.



the adonis, for all his attempt at creating an air of sophistication and education, merely posts in the same fashion as the squad, only with a better vocabulary.

Triple-H_2005

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
  • I mostly lurk...
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #232 on: December 07, 2006, 05:07:21 PM »
ahahaha thought I might not catch that have you, mr. Perfect?
What?  Seriously, I have no idea what you meant to say.

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #233 on: December 07, 2006, 05:08:24 PM »
What?  Seriously, I have no idea what you meant to say.

???
just push some weight!

Triple-H_2005

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
  • I mostly lurk...
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #234 on: December 07, 2006, 05:09:23 PM »
???
There's no subject-verb (or tense) agreement.  The sentence is a mish-mash.

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #235 on: December 07, 2006, 05:09:51 PM »
There's no subject-verb agreement.  The sentence is a mish-mash.

I agree, go back to school. 8)
just push some weight!

knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #236 on: December 08, 2006, 12:30:18 PM »
One more for ya...I got your "nothing stands out"......RIGHT HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERE!

your new name should be "bug eyes"

 ;D

knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #237 on: December 08, 2006, 12:33:47 PM »
 ;)

TheGoldenPrince

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1261
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #238 on: December 08, 2006, 08:38:41 PM »
You're an ass.  I'm not saying that I'm great, but I'm one of MANY that make you look like shyt.  Oh, I'm in my twenties, and I have NEVER touch any gear. 

p.s.-  that 15 year old kid (Bob) "owned" you.


Both of you look good, with decent bases to build upon. Keep plugging on and nice things will happen. And don't waste energy squabbling! ;D
Team Goodrum!

Brixtonbulldog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4884
  • TAKE YO FUCKING JACKET WIT YA
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #239 on: December 08, 2006, 08:39:36 PM »
Both of you look good, with decent bases to build upon. Keep plugging on and nice things will happen. And don't waste energy squabbling! ;D

Fucking squabblers.

MikeThaMachine

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5994
  • WTF Happened, BBing Is Dead. I Didn't Miss A Thing
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #240 on: December 09, 2006, 05:07:44 AM »
Fucking squabblers.

Squabbling is for gays and Indian's...
I

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #241 on: December 09, 2006, 06:02:17 AM »
This guy needs to work on his tan, but can def make some damage, and maybe take Cutler.

































MikeThaMachine

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5994
  • WTF Happened, BBing Is Dead. I Didn't Miss A Thing
Re: CURRENT COMPETITORS THAT ARE BETTER THAN CUTLER?
« Reply #242 on: December 09, 2006, 06:05:46 AM »
This guy needs to work on his tan, but can def make some damage, and maybe take Cutler.




He def has the symmetry that Cutler lacks.
I