Author Topic: MOST OUTRAGEOUS CLAIM BY A GETBIGGER!!!!!!! (Read 11204 times)

davidpaul · « **Reply #75 on:** January 19, 2007, 01:59:56 PM »

Quote from: michael arvilla on January 19, 2007, 01:57:40 PM

i wrapped the shit outta my knees (for a "spring effect) for a single
horrible form /sloppy fat physique................ ..but i wanted that thick mass sooo bad!

u look huge in ure early bulked pics.

u carried strongman kinda size.

michael arvilla · « **Reply #76 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:00:34 PM »

BTW ....fat ladies (which are 99% of my clients ) don't care what i bench/squat

davidpaul · « **Reply #77 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:01:25 PM »

Quote from: michael arvilla on January 19, 2007, 02:00:34 PM

BTW ....fat ladies (which are 99% of my clients ) don't care what i bench/squat

michael arvilla · « **Reply #78 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:02:32 PM »

Quote from: davidpaul on January 19, 2007, 01:59:56 PM

u look huge in ure early bulked pics.

u carried strongman kinda size.

thanx man!...................i overdieted for my show
t3 and clen and ECA took a shitload of my muscle -mass away
i know better now!

tom joad · « **Reply #79 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:02:41 PM »

Mike, how heavy were those lawn chairs that you were doing side laterals with? It looks like you were strugglin a little bit.

kiwiol · « **Reply #80 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:02:48 PM »

Quote from: michael arvilla on January 19, 2007, 01:55:13 PM

When people from here see me (6 ft 2" 230-270 lbs) first thing they say is
" you take horrible pictures dude your wayy more impressive in person"

im not one to brag but if u calll me out im gunna be honest
those lifts 5 - 10 years and 150 lbs ago were done and i wasn't the strongest of my crew by far!

You've got a decent upper body and good upper arms, but I have problem believing your claim of a 600 lb squat even at 300 lb bodyweight - your leg development doesn't offer any proof by way of thickness or density or anything. Of course, it could be that you've got really shitty leg genetics coupled by the fact that you're tall.

You should do free weight barbell Squats and front squats every week, around 10 sets with your max weight and you should do triple drops - do a weight with which you'll reach failure around 8 reps, drop the weight and go to failure for 12 on the next one and drop the weight further and do another 12 - 15 reps. Take 6 - 8 minutes off between sets, give it 3 months and see what happens.

michael arvilla · « **Reply #81 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:03:44 PM »

Quote from: tom joad on January 19, 2007, 02:02:41 PM

Mike, how heavy were those lawn chairs that you were doing side laterals with? It looks like you were strugglin a little bit.

hahahah!

michael arvilla · « **Reply #82 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:04:26 PM »

Quote from: kiwiol on January 19, 2007, 02:02:48 PM

You've got a decent upper body and good upper arms, but I have problem believing your claim of a 600 lb squat even at 300 lb bodyweight - your leg development doesn't offer any proof by way of thickness or density or anything. Of course, it could be that you've got really shitty leg genetics coupled by the fact that you're tall.

You should do free weight barbell Squats and front squats every week, around 10 sets with your max weight and you should do triple drops - do a weight with which you'll reach failure around 8 reps, drop the weight and go to failure for 12 on the next one and drop the weight further and do another 12 - 15 reps. Take 6 - 8 minutes off between sets, give it 3 months and see what happens.

advice!!.............something positive /that i can actually use

thanx!!!

The Squadfather · « **Reply #83 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:06:19 PM »

Quote from: kiwiol on January 19, 2007, 02:02:48 PM

You've got a decent upper body and good upper arms, but I have problem believing your claim of a 600 lb squat even at 300 lb bodyweight - your leg development doesn't offer any proof by way of thickness or density or anything. Of course, it could be that you've got really shitty leg genetics coupled by the fact that you're tall.

You should do free weight barbell Squats and front squats every week, around 10 sets with your max weight and you should do triple drops - do a weight with which you'll reach failure around 8 reps, drop the weight and go to failure for 12 on the next one and drop the weight further and do another 12 - 15 reps. Take 6 - 8 minutes off between sets, give it 3 months and see what happens.

10 sets total or 10 sets each on squats and front squats? 20 sets total seems like a helluva lot.

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #84 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:06:55 PM »

arvilla seems like a good guy but Alexxx completely owns him.
arvilla, you looked alot better when u were 300lbs, your frame/structure doesnt look right all dieted down and skinny.

kiwiol · « **Reply #85 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:08:24 PM »

Quote from: The Squadfather on January 19, 2007, 02:06:19 PM

10 sets total or 10 sets each on squats and front squats? 20 sets total seems like a helluva lot.

Sorry, I meant to say he should alternate front squats one week with normal barbell squats on the next - so 10 sets of either front or back squats on any given day with maximum poundages. Nothing will thicken and pack beef on the legs, especially when you do triple drops on top. I do this every week and my legs have improved heaps in the last 2 years.

The Squadfather · « **Reply #86 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:10:02 PM »

Quote from: kiwiol on January 19, 2007, 02:08:24 PM

Sorry, I meant to say he should alternate front squats one week with normal barbell squats on the next - so 10 sets of either front or back squats on any given day with maximum poundages. Nothing will thicken and pack beef on the legs, especially when you do triple drops on top. I do this every week and my legs have improved heaps in the last 2 years.

oh ok i was like man, 20 sets is brutal!!!

onlyme · « **Reply #87 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:21:36 PM »

The most outrageous is Sean Ray claiming to be a Born again Christian. Now that is the funniest and most outrageous claim ever, not just on Getbig.

michael arvilla · « **Reply #88 on:** January 19, 2007, 05:46:51 PM »

bmacsys · « **Reply #89 on:** January 19, 2007, 08:36:44 PM »

Quote from: michael arvilla on January 19, 2007, 01:21:33 PM

At my heaviest (312 lbs) those lifts were done

your wayyyyyyyyy outta ur league comparing yourself to me
be realistiC compare yourself to someone in your league (Chad MOWER)

Come on man. When were you 312 pounds? At 312 pounds you couldn't even breathe with your frame you would be so fat.

bmacsys · « **Reply #90 on:** January 19, 2007, 08:41:57 PM »

Quote from: alexxx on January 19, 2007, 01:52:59 PM

It's from his website. He uses that to trick some people into letting him train them. Most of his website is plagiarized on top of that.

He also stated his competition weight was 250 on his web site before he even competed. He also used to say he weighed 270 all the time. Never heard 312 till today.

bmacsys · « **Reply #91 on:** January 19, 2007, 08:43:42 PM »

Quote from: michael arvilla on January 19, 2007, 02:02:32 PM

thanx man!...................i overdieted for my show
t3 and clen and ECA took a shitload of my muscle -mass away
i know better now!

Your nuts for taking that shit. Especially at your age and for what?

DVSGOD · « **Reply #92 on:** January 19, 2007, 08:54:28 PM »

Crikey,if Mr Arvilla does that , no wonder he looks so flat,monster overtraining

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #93 on:** January 20, 2007, 02:26:42 AM »

actually mike looks pretty beefy in the above pic.

DVSGOD · « **Reply #94 on:** January 20, 2007, 02:40:52 AM »

Quote from: sevastase on January 20, 2007, 02:26:42 AM

actually mike looks pretty beefy in the above pic.

I hadnt seen that pic,yes he does look hefty in that pic,

SteelePegasus · « **Reply #95 on:** January 20, 2007, 05:40:23 AM »

Quote from: alexxx on January 19, 2007, 10:59:12 AM

5th out of 7. Go back and read it. The judges made a mistake.. who saw that coming..

lol, umm..never mind..

lol..this fucker is actually proud of being 5 out of 7