Oreilly: AntiWar people have always been "Intellectually and morally bankrupt"

[mightymouse72]

you're not answering the question about the horrible, dangerous direction the (some of) repub party has taken.

instead, you want to do a history lesson on the dems?  is that the best you can do?

"Hey officer, I know you think I killed those two guys, but some guy named Stalin once killed 70 million people, so really, what's the big fking deal here?"

what question??   i didn't know there was question on the table.

me with a history lesson??  what did holmes just preach about.  history.  i don't see you calling him out on it. 


great, you're comparing stalin to a political party.  can't YOU do better than that??

oh, almost forgot.......

[Hugo Chavez]

Maybe so.......but he pretty much Liberalism in prospective!

yea, WTF did you just try to say

[240 is Back]

I didn't say that... but I certainly would say that the Dems are doing what they are as a response to the Hijacking of the Republican party...


Like I said... I used to consider myself a REAL Republican... what the hell do I have now? I was told my opinion is shit if I don't go along with the plan.

What choice do I have? Be a Libertarian... which is pretty much what the Republican party used to be.

Remember when conservative meant small government, defense, tax cuts, and keep our noses out of other peoples lives?

You don't? That's because it's been almost 15 years since they were like that.

You think I'm some Democratic uber-liberal? I remember when the Republican party didn't give a shit what you did on your own time... now they want to put their noses right into your business with wiretappings and illegal searches.

How can you possibly defend the Republican party right now...

I'm not saying the Dems are any better really, but since they haven't been in power in such a long time, they haven't had the opportunity to do some things maybe... But absolute power corrupts absolutely... and the Republicans have had absolute power for far too long.

All I know, is that what Bush and his cronies have done is nothing compared to a BJ in the oval office.

Hate if you wanna... and next time, respond to the point...

I would totally buy you a beer.  

He is part of the ever-shrinking group which agrees with Bush.  Aside from him, there are the liberals, and then there is a group in the middle.

This group in the middle voted mostly for Bush. Once he got into office the second time, and the floodgates broke on the WMD lies, they started to open their eyes.  When bush and cheney acknowleged that they would continue the war in Iraq indefinitely, and they would do this even if 99% of the American people didn't want that, they lost a lot of fans.

mighty, you HAVE to agree with Bush's stances.  Tomorrow AM, he could say "Dick and I decided we will be invading Syria, lybia, jordan, S.Arabia, and lebanon", you wouldn't be able to disagree or you could be charged, since you're in the military.  

You'll notice Bush is manuevering right now to try to squeak bills thru and reroute his power control on things, because he is trying to get in front of this mass exodus of congressional republicans.

Wait til 99% of CONGRESS says "Mr bush, it's time to leave iraq" and he still doesn't listen.

[tu_holmes]

what question??   i didn't know there was question on the table.

me with a history lesson??  what did holmes just preach about.  history.  i don't see you calling him out on it. 


great, you're comparing stalin to a political party.  can't YOU do better than that??

oh, almost forgot.......

You're right... I didn't ask a question, I didn't need to... What's been going on with the Republican party is plain to see.

My history lesson was directly related to the Republican party... Which is what we were discussing... We were not discussing the Dems, so why bring them into it really. I remarked on them because you did.

Stalin at that time in the USSR WAS a political party unto himself. The party heads were afraid of him which is why one of them, Most likely Beria (head of the KGB) offed him... The similarities to the Republican party heads and the heads of the USSR is quite frightening.

[Tre]

his talking points tonight were hilarious.

"The same people who hate the war, also hate reagan and love castro".

no shit, this was seriously the headline.  I wish I could get a screenshot.  incredible. 

I loved Reagan. 

How many wars did he start?

[Tre]

For the record..........I love Reagan, and I'm very anti Iraq war! 

So far, so good.

P.S.  Castro is evil, neo-cons blow donkeys...

People may hate Castro, but at least - under his regime - his country's literacy rate is higher than the U.S.'s.

[OzmO]

People may hate Castro, but at least - under his regime - his country's literacy rate is higher than the U.S.'s.

yikes!   Well the republicans knew where to spend 400 billion didn't they? 

[tu_holmes]

People may hate Castro, but at least - under his regime - his country's literacy rate is higher than the U.S.'s.

Castro's problem is that he rules his country in a communist fashion, where people don't own things, the state owns all... People who are born and raised in Capitalist or even Socialist countries can't handle that.

In reality though, he's no fool... and if we had given him a spot on the Washington Senators Baseball team back in the 50s (as a pitcher) we would not be having this conversation.

Oh, and isn't it sad that the communists as a percentage are probably more well read and educated than this country with all of its great freedoms... Makes me sick to my stomach.