Author Topic: Arnold's Best Year?  (Read 7442 times)

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #50 on: February 12, 2007, 03:43:22 PM »
they did, however, morph the waist in that first picture to appear smaller. look at the left hand in the top pic and in the ironman cover.

It's not the same pic.

It's from the same photoshoot, but it's a different one

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #51 on: February 12, 2007, 04:35:52 PM »
It's not the same pic.

It's from the same photoshoot, but it's a different one

Agreed. His head is turned differently, and the shadows are not the same. Same day, not the same picture.
a

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #52 on: February 12, 2007, 04:43:35 PM »
they did, however, morph the waist in that first picture to appear smaller. look at the left hand in the top pic and in the ironman cover.

Dave, you ain't hating on Arnold because of YOUR waist now, are you?  :D

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #53 on: February 13, 2007, 06:00:41 AM »
You ain't kidding.




arnold had an amazingly peaked right bicep but it NEVER looked like this.

the pic has very obviously been messed with.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #54 on: February 13, 2007, 06:04:19 AM »
Here's an untouched similar shot. Slight enhancements in peak, triceps and forearms in the first one.

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #55 on: February 13, 2007, 06:24:15 AM »
Arnold was incredible.

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #56 on: February 13, 2007, 07:31:30 AM »
Here's an untouched similar shot.

Good job by Joe at controlling his erection there.

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #57 on: February 13, 2007, 07:39:24 AM »
Good job by Joe at controlling his erection there.

damn, you've got good eye sight!

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #58 on: February 13, 2007, 07:45:01 AM »
they did, however, morph the waist in that first picture to appear smaller. look at the left hand in the top pic and in the ironman cover.

uh, no. Those are two different pictures from the same day/photoshoot. Look at his head/eyes, they're pointing in diff. places in the pictures.

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #59 on: February 13, 2007, 07:55:40 AM »
Wow, the ignorance of the digital age. It's not morphed, i have the cover of that book and it looks exactly like that. It's an insanely peaked bicep and when the picture was printed on the cover of the book ( in the 70's) they did NOT have the ability to fake muscles. Sorry, it's real.

 ::)

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #60 on: February 13, 2007, 08:02:20 AM »
Arnold was a master at hiding his flaws!

LOL ;D

if your talking about is quads they weren't really flaws back then.  Arnolds quads probably set the starndard at the time, it wasn't until Platz came along that everyone started having these gigantic legs.  Platz and Tim Belknap hit the scene and shocked everyone.  I'd like to see some pics of the 78 olympia-which I've never seen and compare them to the legs of guys onstage in 80 or 81, that woulld be something.
nasser=piece of shit

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #61 on: February 13, 2007, 12:04:55 PM »
Good job by Joe at controlling his erection there.

 ;D
a

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #62 on: February 13, 2007, 12:55:33 PM »
To this day I still wonder, how the hell did he keep his waist so small .!??!

phyxsius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6264
  • Mini Getbigger
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #63 on: February 13, 2007, 02:21:52 PM »
To this day I still wonder, how the hell did he keep his waist so small .!??!


Lack of drug technology back in the day
I am a mini beast

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: Arnold's Best Year?
« Reply #64 on: February 13, 2007, 08:24:03 PM »
Lack of drug technology back in the day

So, thesedays the technology is so good that you get a gut with each GH injection into the abs. Wow, how we've improved.