okay but again, bodybuilders are trained or skilled in exercises that require physical strength (weightlifting). There is no way you can disagree with this statement.
And where exactly does the definition state that you have to be judged in one of the following things to be considered an athlete? If the definition would be something like,
a person that is judged in an exercise, sport or games that requires physical strength, agility or stamina, then you would have a point. But nowhere it is stated that athlete has to fulfill the above stated during a competition or be judged in one of the above stated conditions. . It simple refers to the persons skills per se.
According to webster bb are athletes as they are skilled and trained in weightlifting. This skill is not used during the actual competition but only in preparation, but this is totally insignificant as this is not required to fulfill the definition of an athlete according to webster.
LOL YOu got to be kidding!!! OF course the definition refers to the actual "COMPETITION" or SHOW. Who cares what they do at workouts or practice.
No one cares what a football player does at practice.... or HOW they practice. Its all about HOW they perform in a
GAMENo one cares how or what a bber does during a workout.. or if he or she even works out! THE only think that matters is what they do on stage! And that one criteria is their---------->
AppearanceFor those of you who are hell bent on being considered an athlete. WHy dont u just take up Powerlifting or olympic lifting or better yet strongmen competition then you can be deemed athletes.