Met-Rx, Bodybuilding.com, Flex productions present a free webcast

[Lift Studios]

Met-Rx, Bodybuilding.com, Flex productions present a free, live webcast of the New York City Pro Fitness Championships

Boise, ID – April 9, 2007 – Met-Rx, Bodybuilding.com, and Flex productions announced an agreement to provide a free, live webcast of the 2007 IFBB New York City Pro Women’s Fitness Championship. The event finals webcast begins at 7 PM EST on Saturday, April 14, 2007, and can be seen live on Bodybuilding.com, Metrx.com, and Flexonline.com.

The line up of competitors includes Jennifer Cassety, Regiane Da Silva, Bethany Gainey, Tracey Greenwood, Amy Huber, Angela Monteleone-Semsch, Tami Ough, Laurence Sarrazin, Lisbeth Marquez, Amy Haddad, Julie Shipley-Childs, Nicole Duncan, Liza Hughes, Elizabeth Maurice, Heidi Fletcher, and Katie Szep. Liza Hughes will be making her pro debut, while Julie Childs will be looking to defend her title.

The championships will be broadcast live from the Tribeca Performing Arts at BMCC, in New York, New York.

For more info visit: http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/2007ifbbnypro_info.htm

Bodybuilding.com offers more than 6,000 health and fitness products to help people exceed their shape and fitness goals. They offer more than 19,000 pages of FREE bodybuilding and fitness information including more than 9,000 articles written by 385 plus writers, video & audio segments, with new content being added daily.

[gordiano]

It was a pity reply, being that on this board, the "guys" only care is it's a webcast of the men........

[240 is Back]

19,000 articles... that would be huge. 

If you count in all the "fun" pages... hell, even I was a bodybuilding.com writer at one time. 

[Bodybuilding.com Webmaster]

19,000 articles... that would be huge. 

If you count in all the "fun" pages... hell, even I was a bodybuilding.com writer at one time. 

19,000 articles + - prob around 22 right now.

Was fun for a minute huh 240?  I got the plug pulled on me! first time ever. gee thanks.

W

[Stavios]

haha the undercover dough boy was awesome !

you guys should bring it back !

[CQ]

It was a pity reply, being that on this board, the "guys" only care is it's a webcast of the men........

My lonely feeble self cares!

I will be pinned to the webcast, anyone with me?

[sandycoosworth]

sure, ill pin ya

[240 is Back]

19,000 articles + - prob around 22 right now.
Was fun for a minute huh 240?  I got the plug pulled on me! first time ever. gee thanks.
W

Ah yes, Undercover Dough... Bodybuilding from the perspective of the fat kid.

I really wish I had made a copy of that webpage before it went byebye.

[Lift Studios]

Ah yes, Undercover Dough... Bodybuilding from the perspective of the fat kid.

I really wish I had made a copy of that webpage before it went byebye.

The entire piece did nothing but paint every pro bodybuilder you mentioned in a negative light. Don't play it off like it was a great article. It was terrible.

Back on track with this thread, bodybuilding.com steps up with the webcast once again as this show begins shortly.

[240 is Back]

The entire piece did nothing but paint every pro bodybuilder you mentioned in a negative light. Don't play it off like it was a great article. It was terrible.

Are you questioning the judgment of bodybuilding.com web content managers, Isaac?

[Lift Studios]

Are you questioning the judgment of bodybuilding.com web content managers, Isaac?

I'm part of the bodybuilding.com team. 

[240 is Back]

I'm part of the bodybuilding.com team. 

Which is why I'm challenging you to take a position on the their content selection methods.

To say my article was "terrible" was publicly stating that they allow "terrible" content to be published on their great site, which I disagree with.  But it's a free country, so I do respect your right to criticize them.  Personally, i think their world-class web content team does a great job in selecting the wide variety of articles they share with the world.

[Chick]

Which is why I'm challenging you to take a position on the their content selection methods.

To say my article was "terrible" was publicly stating that they allow "terrible" content to be published on their great site, which I disagree with.  But it's a free country, so I do respect your right to criticize them.  Personally, i think their world-class web content team does a great job in selecting the wide variety of articles they share with the world.

Issac doesn't need to take a position on it...your "article" was garbage and was pulled. I'll take full responsibility, as it was at my request that it was taken down...you're right, it is a free country and I felt free to get rid of it.

[240 is Back]

Issac doesn't need to take a position on it...your "article" was garbage and was pulled. I'll take full responsibility, as it was at my request that it was taken down...you're right, it is a free country and I felt free to get rid of it.

Hey, no need to be feisty.  The staff saw it posted here and contacted me.  They thought it was hilarious and had me polish it up and send it to them.  Then we worked on the layout and they published it.  It was a pretty big hit over there on bodybuidling.com's IFBB section, if you recall.

Of course, we're all free to have our own opinions on it.  I respect your analysis of my literary work and will put every effort forth to dazzle you with the next one.