Author Topic: is this Paul Dillett?  (Read 3690 times)

HUGEPECS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4061
  • School of Hard knocks Gym
Re: is this Paul Dillett?
« Reply #25 on: April 17, 2007, 07:45:38 AM »
he is coleman's sidekick
Get Big, or Die Trying

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: is this Paul Dillett?
« Reply #26 on: April 17, 2007, 07:49:36 AM »
he is coleman's sidekick

That's not Ronnie Coleman.

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: is this Paul Dillett?
« Reply #27 on: April 17, 2007, 07:55:51 AM »
Well, I guess his size doesn't mean jack. nonetheless, he should try the WWE.

i know this is not sherdog.com but, seriously???

his size is the only reason he's been able to come into the toughest sport in the world at such a late stage and actually do well.

that was no tomato can he was fighting there, it was Mirko Cro Cop Filipopvic, a pure fighting machine.

sapp deserves a lot of credit for donig it the hard way.

wwe is not a sport, it is a bunch of big useless muscle heads bouncing off each other in the name of 'entertainment'.

HUGEPECS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4061
  • School of Hard knocks Gym
Re: is this Paul Dillett?
« Reply #28 on: April 17, 2007, 08:15:34 AM »
i know this is not sherdog.com but, seriously???

his size is the only reason he's been able to come into the toughest sport in the world at such a late stage and actually do well.

that was no tomato can he was fighting there, it was Mirko Cro Cop Filipopvic, a pure fighting machine.

sapp deserves a lot of credit for donig it the hard way.

wwe is not a sport, it is a bunch of big useless muscle heads bouncing off each other in the name of 'entertainment'.



Agreed. is it safe to say that most WWE stars would last a career into real fighting?
Get Big, or Die Trying

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: is this Paul Dillett?
« Reply #29 on: April 17, 2007, 08:32:39 AM »


Agreed. is it safe to say that most WWE stars would last a career into real fighting?

difficult to say.

i have no idea who may be talented.

big guys jumping around swinging each other from turnbuckle to turnbuckle whilst throwing in bbing poses every 10 seconds tells me as much about their ability to actually fight as if they were playing golf.

HUGEPECS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4061
  • School of Hard knocks Gym
Re: is this Paul Dillett?
« Reply #30 on: April 17, 2007, 08:49:31 AM »
well, maybe one day UFC will be the king of the hill, but WWE is still doing what they do best, entertaining people. I wonder if the transition from WWE to real fighting is harder than the other way around
Get Big, or Die Trying

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: is this Paul Dillett?
« Reply #31 on: April 17, 2007, 09:08:56 AM »
well, maybe one day UFC will be the king of the hill, but WWE is still doing what they do best, entertaining people. I wonder if the transition from WWE to real fighting is harder than the other way around

good question, there is so little correlation between the two.

a fighter enters the ring as calm and relaxed as possible because he knows that he must preserve his energy and control his emotions, whereas with wwe the more flexing, strutting and yelling the better.

a fighter goes about his business in a calm, controlled manner, watching for openings/weaknesses whilst executing his strategy. his objective is to destroy his opponent all right, but rushing in without thinking is the quickest way to get destroyed yourself.

a wwe wrestler continues to strut, scream, flex and do everything possible to indicate to the crowd and his opponent exactly what he's going to do next. basically the opposite to fighting.


HUGEPECS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4061
  • School of Hard knocks Gym
Re: is this Paul Dillett?
« Reply #32 on: April 17, 2007, 10:02:17 AM »
good question, there is so little correlation between the two.

a fighter enters the ring as calm and relaxed as possible because he knows that he must preserve his energy and control his emotions, whereas with wwe the more flexing, strutting and yelling the better.

a fighter goes about his business in a calm, controlled manner, watching for openings/weaknesses whilst executing his strategy. his objective is to destroy his opponent all right, but rushing in without thinking is the quickest way to get destroyed yourself.

a wwe wrestler continues to strut, scream, flex and do everything possible to indicate to the crowd and his opponent exactly what he's going to do next. basically the opposite to fighting.




right on. but after all, the WWE is just another movie being shot on location. I wonder how many times they rewrite the scripts ;D
Get Big, or Die Trying

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: is this Paul Dillett?
« Reply #33 on: April 17, 2007, 10:13:23 AM »
Sapp is probably the most financially stable MMA fighter in the world. I love how people look at him going doen after Cro Cop hits him and say hes crying cos he got punched in the face. Hos eye socket was literally smashed in, you think thats comparable to a slap on the cheek?
Scouser on Tour

dylan_dent

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 106
Re: is this Paul Dillett?
« Reply #34 on: April 17, 2007, 10:37:17 AM »
And I love how many try to use Tyson as the benchmark for fighting greatness! Mirko is a FAR greater fighter. And man oh man, what about Fedor? What monsters.

D

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: is this Paul Dillett?
« Reply #35 on: April 17, 2007, 10:40:38 AM »
lol... an mike pissed away more money than fedor or crocop will ever see...and mike in his prime would have demolished both