Author Topic: Why do our "strong on defense" Republican leaders never talk about Pakistan?  (Read 1719 times)

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
<< When Pakistan's President General Musharraf suspended the country's chief justice in March, protests and rioting followed. At least 40 people died in two days of violence last weekend, and now the political instability seems to be spreading. >>

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/6670561.stm

While the neo-fascists are getting erections at the prospect of bombing Iran, a country that already has a nuclear arsenal is having firefights in the center of its largest city.

The strong, decisive action by the Bush administration to respond to this imminent threat to global security must surely be coming along any minute now.

Right?

The Coach

  • Guest
<< When Pakistan's President General Musharraf suspended the country's chief justice in March, protests and rioting followed. At least 40 people died in two days of violence last weekend, and now the political instability seems to be spreading. >>

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/6670561.stm

While the neo-fascists are getting erections at the prospect of bombing Iran, a country that already has a nuclear arsenal is having firefights in the center of its largest city.

The strong, decisive action by the Bush administration to respond to this imminent threat to global security must surely be coming along any minute now.

Right?

CRICKETS

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
CRICKETS

If Musharaf gets overthrown and a anti-american regime comes to power then that's bad news for every civilized nation..

But people like you don't understand that.

egj13

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 554
  • Got life by the balls
<< When Pakistan's President General Musharraf suspended the country's chief justice in March, protests and rioting followed. At least 40 people died in two days of violence last weekend, and now the political instability seems to be spreading. >>

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/6670561.stm

While the neo-fascists are getting erections at the prospect of bombing Iran, a country that already has a nuclear arsenal is having firefights in the center of its largest city.

The strong, decisive action by the Bush administration to respond to this imminent threat to global security must surely be coming along any minute now.

Right?

Now that the Democrats are in power these new issues are bi partisan. I haven't heard any democrats saying we need to go to Pakistan.

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Now that the Democrats are in power these new issues are bi partisan.

When and if W. deigns to answer the question of whether he dispatched Card and Gonzales to Ashcroft's hospital room, you can use the word "bipartisan".

Until then, it's George Bush vs Everyone Else and don't try bullshitting otherwise.

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
i'm from pakistan...

we cannot win there..

unless ya nuke both paki and afghan and certain parts of india ALL AT THE SAME TIME.


carpe` vaginum!

gcb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2283
  • you suffer, why?
Those countries aren't really a threat (except if they decide to use thier nukes). They couldn't organise an invasion of a 16th birthday party.

Brixtonbulldog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4884
  • TAKE YO FUCKING JACKET WIT YA
<< When Pakistan's President General Musharraf suspended the country's chief justice in March, protests and rioting followed. At least 40 people died in two days of violence last weekend, and now the political instability seems to be spreading. >>

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/6670561.stm

While the neo-fascists are getting erections at the prospect of bombing Iran, a country that already has a nuclear arsenal is having firefights in the center of its largest city.

The strong, decisive action by the Bush administration to respond to this imminent threat to global security must surely be coming along any minute now.

Right?

The point is to keep threatening nations from GETTING nukes.  Nations that already have them have to be dealt with far more delicately.  (N. Korea.)  If Kim Jong Il hadn't already had nukes we would have done what we did to Iraq to Korea as well.  (And what we might end up doing to Iran and a few others in the middle east.)

egj13

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 554
  • Got life by the balls
When and if W. deigns to answer the question of whether he dispatched Card and Gonzales to Ashcroft's hospital room, you can use the word "bipartisan".

Until then, it's George Bush vs Everyone Else and don't try bullshitting otherwise.

No, if that happened, it was before the Democrats were in power so it id on Bush . I said new things (try working on that reading), basically everything since january.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Um Came's responce pretty much answers it...They have nukes and if the radical muslim scumbags get their hands on it we're all in alot of trouble. Musharraf could kill half his people and roll around in their guts if he wanted and we would'nt say a thing. As long as the nutbags don't get the nukes.
L

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Um Came's responce pretty much answers it...They have nukes and if the radical muslim scumbags get their hands on it we're all in alot of trouble. Musharraf could kill half his people and roll around in their guts if he wanted and we would'nt say a thing. As long as the nutbags don't get the nukes.

Yeah..

Neither dems nor repugs seem to understand the danger posed from pakistan.. If Musharaf ever gets overthrown and a anti-west regime comes to power then we must attack pakistan at whatever the cost.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
I think as we're thinking about it Indoia will start launching shit at them. Seriously..I'm not sure where they have their nukes but I'm sure the idea of dropping on their sites and seizing them has crossed the minds of alot of folks in the West..either that or airstikes by India to make sure they're not a threat.
L

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
I think as we're thinking about it Indoia will start launching shit at them. Seriously..I'm not sure where they have their nukes but I'm sure the idea of dropping on their sites and seizing them has crossed the minds of alot of folks in the West..either that or airstikes by India to make sure they're not a threat.

I think most of their nukes are in the north around jammu and kashmir.

Also, India is embracing western ideals and is growing, changing at a huge pace. They already hate pakistan and soon they'll hate pakistan ever more due to conflicting ideals between the two nations. They'll overpower pakistan pretty easily if something does ever go down in the near future because they'll be a lot more powerful economically.