Remember in the 2000 presidential debates when George W. Bush did not know that Social Security was a federal program?
Well that was a knee-slapper and you all know that he just "misspoke", right?
Here's another demonstration of this small man's pretension to act like a leader:
"And so -- but you got to be for something in Washington. You can't be against federalization, you've got to be for a plan that enhances the relationship between doctor and patient, and that's what I'm for."
What is this in reference to? A bi-partisan piece of legislation that would extend medical insurance coverage to families earning up to $60,000 for a family of four.
How's that again? Insuring uninsured children.
And Bush wants to veto that? Yes.
Why?
So he can push for a private insurance plan that "enhances the relationship between doctor and patient..."
Would someone explain to the leader of the free world that uninsured people do not have doctors?
