how do you know this, based on the way he speaks in videos?
just because you aren't a great public speaker doesn't mean you aren't intelligent
i do think the gh15 is nasser though
E
Yes, in a nutshell, that is why.
Glenn Beck once said that George Bush sounds a lot smarter when you read what he writes. Well, DUH, he has speech writers write all of his speeches and is such a moron he can't even present them with any remnants of intelligence showing. That said, I agree with Glenn, that reading what a person says is an accurate way to gauge their intelligence. Not everyone is a good speaker, so read what they say and determine if that exposes intellectualism or not.
In Dennis' case, if you read what he has to say, he doesn't come across as particularly smart. I don't see how anyone can say that Nasser isn't an extremely intelligent person. Maybe he needs to work on his people skills, that I don't know. But I know that as far as sheer academic IQ is concerned, he is bright, one of the brightest pro bodybuilders I have ever heard about in my 7+ year tenure as a fan, and I have heard about them all.
Go back and re-read all of gh15's posts. From there, read Nasser's interviews and read them in the same broken English that gh15 writes in. Compare the two. You will find they are very close in so many ways, and that includes little nuances. Not just broad opinions (synthol is everywhere, narcotics are bad), but even little details that can only be pinpointed in posts if you really analyze them deeply or have a good eye for detail. As smart as Nasser is, it is hard to try to carry on two identities and expect to never reveal any clues. I'm not saying that gh15 is Nasser, just that based on the totality of the evidence, it would appear that way.
Example: both are very smart when it comes to bodybuilding, and have an approximately equal level of knowledge when it comes to other general issues. However, both are not afraid to endorse their every point of view, even outside of their area of expertise, as if they are experts in those areas too. gh15's opinions on drug policy for example reeks of naivety. Nasser expresses a similar confident naivety in some of his points of view. Commenting that he feels that steroids should be used for depression without expanding on that further is an example of him speaking outside of his area of expertise for example. That is not the greatest example, but this reply is getting very long so I will cut it off now.
