The Hillary/DNC-Russia Conspiracy Theory

[chaos]

There was a Democrat plot to frame Trump.  We knew that before the Durham report.

So what.

This is what is wrong with America. People live too long. Just like you have to be a certain age to drive, vote, etc, there should be a maximum age to vote, drive, etc.

[Humble Narcissist]

The Russians Colluded Massively — with Democrats
By DEROY MURDOCK
February 24, 2018

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/the-russians-colluded-massively-with-democrats/

The democrats always accuse republicans of what dems are actually doing.

[Soul Crusher]

[Grape Ape]

Would be nice for the leftists on this board to unite in agreement that this is really f'n bad.

And the lack of media coverage is disturbing - it's much bigger than Watergate, and it's ignored.

[Soul Crusher]

Would be nice for the leftists on this board to unite in agreement that this is really f'n bad.

And the lack of media coverage is disturbing - it's much bigger than Watergate, and it's ignored.

They are proud of it!   

[Primemuscle]

Yes "so what."  That's the mainstream media's response to all of this.  Typical. 

You are correct.  "We" only includes those who pay attention to current events, read past the headlines, don't live in a bubble, and expose themselves to multiple news sources.

Thanks for explaining your application of the word, 'we'.

FYI, it has been shown over and over that Coach does not read past the headlines or if he does he misses the parts that read the opposite of what the headlines imply.

[Dos Equis]

Thanks for explaining your application of the word, 'we'.

FYI, it has been shown over and over that Coach does not read past the headlines or if he does he misses the parts that read the opposite of what the headlines imply.

Does that bother you? 

Also, there really isn't any difference between not reading past headlines, and refusing to read articles while focusing on who wrote the article, while ignoring the substance. 

[Primemuscle]

Does that bother you? 

Also, there really isn't any difference between not reading past headlines, and refusing to read articles while focusing on who wrote the article, while ignoring the substance.

Nothing you post bothers me. I do not always agree with some of what you say or how you word it.

The is a big difference between choosing not to read articles written by crackpots and not reading past the headlines you support. In the first example you usually get from it exactly what you expected. In the second one you sometimes find the opposite of what you thought you would. Sensationalized misleading headlines are common practice in the tabloids. 

[Dos Equis]

Nothing you post bothers me. I do not always agree with some of what you say or how you word it.

The is a big difference between choosing not to read articles written by crackpots and not reading past the headlines you support. In the first example you usually get from it exactly what you expected. In the second one you sometimes find the opposite of what you thought you would. Sensationalized misleading headlines are common practice in the tabloids.

I wasn't asking whether anything I post bothers you.  I was asking whether your claim that Coach doesn't read past headlines bother you.

What is your definition of "crackpot"?

[Primemuscle]

I wasn't asking whether anything I post bothers you.  I was asking whether your claim that Coach doesn't read past headlines bother you.

What is your definition of "crackpot"?

Like I posted earlier today, I like Coach. I believe he is a good person. It bothers me when he sets himself up by not reading the accompanying article or if he is reading it, he either misses or ignores that the article says something entirely different than the headline did and subsequently posts that which makes him look foolish.

My definition of crackpot is about the same as the definition in Websters: 'one given to eccentric or wildly foolish notions.' However, I find some eccentric people and their eccentricities interesting, amusing, and even enjoyable. 

[Dos Equis]

Like I posted earlier today, I like Coach. I believe he is a good person. It bothers me when he sets himself up by not reading the accompanying article or if he is reading it, he either misses or ignores that the article says something entirely different than the headline did and subsequently posts that which makes him look foolish.

My definition of crackpot is about the same as the definition in Websters: 'one given to eccentric or wildly foolish notions.' However, I find some eccentric people and their eccentricities interesting, amusing, and even enjoyable.

I think your definition is broader than Websters, because you routinely refuse to read any conservative sources. 

[Dos Equis]

Durham Report Reveals FBI Shut Down Four Criminal Investigations into the Clintons
JORDAN DIXON-HAMILTON
18 May 2023
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/05/18/durham-report-reveals-fbi-shut-down-four-criminal-investigations-into-the-clintons/

[Dos Equis]

How Obama officials and the FBI squashed any investigation into Hillary Clinton
By Andrew C. McCarthy
May 19, 2023
https://nypost.com/2023/05/19/how-obama-officials-fbi-squashed-any-investigation-into-hillary-clinton/?dicbo=v2-isWvVr9

[Dos Equis]

Hillary Clinton's plan to 'vilify' Trump by linking him to Putin was briefed to Obama and Biden before the election in 2016 - while the FBI and DOJ restricted investigations into her campaign, Durham report says
Special Counsel John Durham released his final report on Monday
It accused FBI agents of failing to look into allegations against Hillary Clinton
It contrasted that with the way it relied on the Steele Dossier against Trump
By ROB CRILLY, SENIOR U.S. POLITICAL REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 15 May 2023
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12086891/Hillarys-plan-link-Trump-Putin-briefed-Obama-Biden-Durham-report.html