Author Topic: TRANSDERMAL VS INJECTABLE  (Read 882 times)

chixlegs

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 345
TRANSDERMAL VS INJECTABLE
« on: August 31, 2008, 10:39:08 AM »
I have used transdermal test cream and gel a couple times in the past.  They claim that because it keeps your test levels steady that you should experience fewer side effects than the fluxuations of injectables.  But my hair fell out a lot, my balls shrank BIG TIME and I had nagging gyno.  I thought using an injectable would be ten times worse.

Now I am using an injectable test, its real, from a pharmacy.  400 mg per week -- more than what I was using with the cream (considering it only absorbs at about 10%), and yet after five full weeks I have had no hair loss, very little in the way of gyno (using nolva to help), and my testicles have not atrophied at all.  I have gotten good results and the injections are really easy and painless.  Once a week in the glute with a fresh 23 gauge one inch.

I don't really have a question, just an observation.  It seems odd to me that the transdermal test caused me so many more aggrevating side effects than the more powerful and easier to use injectable.  Obviously, I am staying with the needle from now on.

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15227
  • "Don't Try"
Re: TRANSDERMAL VS INJECTABLE
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2008, 01:54:52 PM »
Transdermal T causes higher DHT levels.