Author Topic: Democrat Henry Waxman: 'Oversight of the Internet, One of His Top Priorities'  (Read 956 times)

James

  • Guest
Democrat Rep. Henry Waxman: 'Oversight of the Internet is One of His Top Priorities'

The American Spectator's Prowler column published today has a disturbing report on the plans by the Democratic Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee Henry Waxman to regulate political speech on the Internet.

In addition to details of methods Waxman is considering to rein in conservative talk radio, The Prowler reports on Waxman's desire to use the power of the federal government to investigate amd control political content on the Internet.

The article quotes an unnamed committee staffer as saying of Waxman's power grab:

"Does one heavily trafficked Internet site present one side of an issue and not link to sites that present alternative views? These are some of the questions the chairman is thinking about right now, and we are going to have an FCC that will finally have the people in place to answer them."

"Internet radio is becoming a big deal, and we're seeing that some web sites are able to control traffic and information, while other sites that may be of interest or use to citizens get limited traffic because of the way the people search and look for information. We're at very early stages on this, but the chairman has made it clear that oversight of the Internet is one of his top priorities."

"This isn't just about Limbaugh or a local radio host most of us haven't heard about. The FCC and state and local governments also have oversight over the Internet lines and the cable and telecom companies that operate them. We want to get alternative views on radio and TV, but we also want to makes sure those alternative views are read, heard and seen online, which is becoming increasingly video and audio driven. Thanks to the stimulus package, we've established that broadband networks -- the Internet -- are critical, national infrastructure. We think that gives us an opening to look at what runs over that critical infrastructure."

The article reports that Waxman intends to work with Democratic Party President Barack Hussein Obama's nominee to be chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Julius Genachowski, who is awaiting confirmation by the Democrat controlled Senate, to investigate and regulate free speech on the Internet.






Change !   :o   :o   :o

Eyeball Chambers

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14348
  • Would you hold still? You're making me fuck up...
Sick  >:(
S

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Haha isn't this the same hook nosed troll in Bigger Stronger Faster that didn't know anything about the scheduling of steroids or the drinking age? This fucker is a clueless moron!  Just another government stooge trying to shit on our freedoms. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Sick  >:(

I already posted this last night.  

You guys are really behind the 8 ball.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Yet - I bet 100000000000000% that the usual parade of liberal apologists will be here to defend this.

James

  • Guest
Quote
Yet - I bet 100000000000000% that the usual parade of liberal apologists will be here to defend this.

 :)

timfogarty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7108
  • @fogartyTim on twitter
Yet - I bet 100000000000000% that the usual parade of liberal apologists will be here to defend this.

how about it's just right wing fear mongering.  the use of Obama's middle name gave it away.

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
how about it's just right wing fear mongering.  the use of Obama's middle name gave it away.

Tim are you the guy that runs MuscleMemory?  If so that's a nice site.  Much appreciated. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
how about it's just right wing fear mongering.  the use of Obama's middle name gave it away.

Just like fear mongering about spending a trillion on welfare and dropping the charges against the cole bombers?

There is a direct qoute in the article.

You are just in denial that your messiah has been proven to be the phony we said he was.

War-Horse

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6490
Hes asking for a fair view of the topics.    Not total control.   This might help to stop al this dumbass bi-partisanship, if we dont get a balanced view to the public, then we'll just keep screaming at eachother and nothing changes.

Limbaugh can still spew his shit all over.....and so can maddow.  Theyll just have links on their sites to eachother....happyland   :D

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
I already posted this last night.  

You guys are really behind the 8 ball.

I posted something regarding this subject over a month  ago.

I'm from the future and believe me, it looks BAD.

War-Horse

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6490
I posted something regarding this subject over a month  ago.

I'm from the future and believe me, it looks BAD.



Thats why i get stuck on this board.  We're very thorough.   always some links or veiws i may not have considered. 8)

gcb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2283
  • you suffer, why?
looks really like you cherry picked that for the stuff you don't like - what they seem to be implying is that they want the public to get a more balanced view of political issues and they don't think this is happening - ie. through some form of censorship

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
looks really like you cherry picked that for the stuff you don't like - what they seem to be implying is that they want the public to get a more balanced view of political issues and they don't think this is happening - ie. through some form of censorship

And that is censorship you moron. 

You people truly have no clue about history, law, the constitution, and the true motives of these people.

The fools cheering this on would be cheering the King George of England if we were back in 1776.


SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Haha isn't this the same hook nosed troll in Bigger Stronger Faster that didn't know anything about the scheduling of steroids or the drinking age? This fucker is a clueless moron!  Just another government stooge trying to shit on our freedoms. 

He indeed is the ASSHOLE who was clueless as to where the money went toward investigating steroids in the BIGGER, STRONGER, FASTER MOVIE and in everything else asked of him and his department.....What a piece of work...
C

JBGRAY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2038
Who can exactly determine what the opposite side of a viewpoint is?  And since there are more than two viewpoints on any issue, what goes to the forefront?  Are you telling me that it's either Limbaugh or Malloy?  Nothing else?  Democrat or Republican(both are disastrous if left unchecked)? 

This isn't 1968 anymore.  There are more than a fair share of media and entertainment outlets that provide for a diverse and opposing viewpoints on a number of issues. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Truly disturbing trends going on.

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
But Tim, take away the perhaps biased tone and look at what Waxman is saying.  Its unacceptible...policing, oversight, gov control.  This is NOT in our best interest.  We must stop this repub vs democrat and see that the country is really moving in a socialist/Europe direction.  We have to stop this trend and make sure some of this massive gov intervention is temporary.

gcb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2283
  • you suffer, why?
And that is censorship you moron. 

You people truly have no clue about history, law, the constitution, and the true motives of these people.

The fools cheering this on would be cheering the King George of England if we were back in 1776.



I don't remember censoring anyone - but since most news/radio is run by big business it makes sense that they encourage a certain slant on the news. This is just trying to bring back the balance. But this is probably lost on you since you probably think Fox News is balanced. Long live the "liberal" media.

gcb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2283
  • you suffer, why?
But Tim, take away the perhaps biased tone and look at what Waxman is saying.  Its unacceptible...policing, oversight, gov control.  This is NOT in our best interest.  We must stop this repub vs democrat and see that the country is really moving in a socialist/Europe direction.  We have to stop this trend and make sure some of this massive gov intervention is temporary.

Yeah like Europe is such a bad place to live  ::)