Author Topic: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"  (Read 3682 times)

JOCKTHEGLIDE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2573
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #50 on: July 16, 2009, 01:47:25 PM »
law dont mean squat its how you feel inside for the american people,,think about this law is NOT CONREATE it can be molded and skewed no matter what is written down in the end its up the judge the land of the  law who , ,"feels" what is wrong do you guys even know that the supereme court can change anything.
Like 333386 said, jock I really hope you aren't serious.  This country needs justices who rule on law and not precedent, and who don't let their personal bias' get in the way.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39832
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #51 on: July 16, 2009, 01:48:13 PM »
law dont mean squat its how you feel inside for the american people,,think about this law is NOT CONREATE it can be molded and skewed no matter what is written down in the end its up the judge the land of the  law who , ,"feels" what is wrong do you guys even know that the supereme court can change anything.

Ok, this is totally a gimmick account.  Come on. 

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #52 on: July 16, 2009, 03:00:37 PM »
Jock, while I respect your opinion that is completely not how the judicial system works...it would be an absolute disaster if it was.  We must have transparent rules that apply to all.

In my previous post, I don't mean to insinuate Sotomayor is extreme, from what I've heard, most of her decisions seem to fall in the mainstream judicial opinions.  This firefighter case really bothered me.  I just listened to the Hispanic firefighter that was denied the promotion...complete bullshit.  I can't believe their case wasn't won unanimously.

JOCKTHEGLIDE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2573
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #53 on: July 16, 2009, 03:41:55 PM »
shootfighter WE know,,,its now how the judicial system works as common american people,,but they supreme court people do what as they wish they have more power to things into place than the president itself,,the fire fighter case may bother you but it does not bother the AMERICAN people as much as you think if it did bother us so much we would riot as you know society can change america also back in the day we used to riot against the system now we just sit behind our computers dont do sheit I mean literally shit,,,like I meiton we are a generation of nothingness we dont bother to fight for what is right and wrong so I know that sotomyer will be a supreme court judge its not about the money its about the power that once obama has in place he will go to her over and over,,,obama is doing this for his own good not for the general public,,if anything happens to obama he knows he can go back to sotoymyer is 15,,20,,and on and on for a favor if he ever go sued for anything
Jock, while I respect your opinion that is completely not how the judicial system works...it would be an absolute disaster if it was.  We must have transparent rules that apply to all.

In my previous post, I don't mean to insinuate Sotomayor is extreme, from what I've heard, most of her decisions seem to fall in the mainstream judicial opinions.  This firefighter case really bothered me.  I just listened to the Hispanic firefighter that was denied the promotion...complete bullshit.  I can't believe their case wasn't won unanimously.

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #54 on: July 16, 2009, 06:36:51 PM »


Do you know why she is has a blind fold on?
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

JOCKTHEGLIDE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2573
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #55 on: July 16, 2009, 10:48:31 PM »
so she does not know who is doing her,,, ???


Do you know why she is has a blind fold on?

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #56 on: July 17, 2009, 06:03:41 AM »
Great picture Kazan.  That should have posted along with these hearings, to re-emphasize the importance of equal justice for all under the law.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39832
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #57 on: July 17, 2009, 06:13:12 AM »
Great picture Kazan.  That should have posted along with these hearings, to re-emphasize the importance of equal justice for all under the law.

If nothing else, Sotomayor proved that Alito, Scalia, Thomas, and Roberts will embarass her on the bench.   

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31234
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #58 on: July 17, 2009, 06:48:36 AM »
so she does not know who is doing her,,, ???

LOL!

In many ways this is true.

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31234
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #59 on: July 17, 2009, 06:49:09 AM »
If nothing else, Sotomayor proved that Alito, Scalia, Thomas, and Roberts will embarass her on the bench.   

maybe not.  she could be the one embarassing those old windbags.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39832
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #60 on: July 17, 2009, 06:53:05 AM »
maybe not.  she could be the one embarassing those old windbags.

Ha ha!  Even liberal law professors say she is a lightweight on con law issues. 

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #61 on: July 17, 2009, 06:56:03 AM »
so she does not know who is doing her,,, ???

Did you actually make it past the 5th grade?
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39832
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #62 on: July 17, 2009, 07:01:44 AM »
Liberal Law Professors are against Sotomayor...do you agree with them?

Liberal Law Professors Against Sotomayor?



At least one liberal law professor was “completely disgusted” by Judge Sotomayor’s testimony. In an online debate on the Federalist Society’s website, Georgetown law professor Mike Seidman writes:

I was completely disgusted by Judge Sotomayor's testimony today. If she was not perjuring herself, she is intellectually unqualified to be on the Supreme Court. If she was perjuring herself, she is morally unqualified. How could someone who has been on the bench for seventeen years possibly believe that judging in hard cases involves no more than applying the law to the facts? …


Perhaps Justice Sotomayor should be excused because our official ideology about judging is so degraded that she would sacrifice a position on the Supreme Court if she told the truth. Legal academics who defend what she did today have no such excuse. They should be ashamed of themselves.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #63 on: July 17, 2009, 08:59:39 AM »
I think that if anyone on this website who supports that fat Horatio Sanz in a wig looking moron, had taken a few courses in constitutional law, or any law for that matter- they would be forced to either disclaim their support, or admit they were only supporting her because of her color, or because Obama appointed her.

Even the liberal justices I cant stand ideologically are qualified as competant and experienced jurists. Sotomayor is a horrible pick- not just based on comments regarding race and judicial activism, but because shes  BAD JUDGE WHO DOESNT KNOW THE LAW.

What people need to realize is that the Supreme Court is a court of LAW. There are no trials, there are no witnesses, there is no evidence. The justices base their decisions on the case briefs, the procedural history of the case and the attorneys arguing before them on both sides. The fact that this woman may be somewhat biased in favor of minorities doesn't even bother me that much, because the LAW is the LAW. Judicial activism and lacking a basic command of the constitution is reason enough not to confirm her alone.

With that being said, shes going to be confirmed anyway. So fuck it. it doesn't really matter.


JOCKTHEGLIDE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2573
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #64 on: July 17, 2009, 02:26:58 PM »
Did you actually make it past the 5th grade?
no,,but by the time you post again sotoymer shold be on the supree court judge panel,, :D

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #65 on: July 17, 2009, 05:34:16 PM »
no,,but by the time you post again sotoymer shold be on the supree court judge panel,, :D

I figured you never made it out of grade school, you act like child.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

JOCKTHEGLIDE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2573
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #66 on: July 17, 2009, 08:30:55 PM »
I figured you never made it out of grade school, you act like child.
fella,,do you even know who you  are talking too I have my connection in washington I donated millions of dollars to compaigns they know me well have lunches and all

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39832
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #67 on: July 18, 2009, 07:08:38 AM »
fella,,do you even know who you  are talking too I have my connection in washington I donated millions of dollars to compaigns they know me well have lunches and all

Considering your grammar and spelling, it must be the mental disabilities lobby you work for.   

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #68 on: July 18, 2009, 07:10:59 AM »
fella,,do you even know who you  are talking too I have my connection in washington I donated millions of dollars to compaigns they know me well have lunches and all

What your point? That you are proving the elected officials of this country are retarded?
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6371
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #69 on: July 18, 2009, 10:03:42 AM »
fella,,do you even know who you  are talking too I have my connection in washington I donated millions of dollars to compaigns they know me well have lunches and all

Awesome Gimmick right here, folks.

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #70 on: July 19, 2009, 08:02:29 AM »

Look at all of getbig's right wing loonies crying about Sotomayor in this thread. Don't worry, you'll have another 30+ years to whine about her while she presides on the Supreme Court. ;D
Even "JOCK" aka "gh15" is taking the mental midgets to school.


!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39832
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #71 on: July 19, 2009, 08:03:55 AM »
Look at all of getbig's right wing loonies crying about Sotomayor in this thread. Don't worry, you'll have another 30+ years to whine about her while she presides on the Supreme Court. ;D
Even "JOCK" aka "gh15" is taking the mental midgets to school.




Ha ha, even liberal lawyers say she is a lightweight. 


Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #72 on: July 19, 2009, 08:53:08 AM »
Ha ha, even liberal lawyers say she is a lightweight. 

Nobody cares what a few jealous lawyers are saying. She has more judicial experience than any nominee in the last 100 years.

You and those "liberal lawyers" can eat some cheese with your WHINE for the next 30 years while Judge Sotomayor presides on the SC bench.  ;D
!

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Sotomayor "1" GOP "0"
« Reply #73 on: July 19, 2009, 09:51:32 AM »
Nobody cares what a few jealous lawyers are saying. She has more judicial experience than any nominee in the last 100 years.

You and those "liberal lawyers" can eat some cheese with your WHINE for the next 30 years while Judge Sotomayor presides on the SC bench.  ;D


This why no one takes you seriuosly, you don't give a shit that 6 out 10 rulings she made that went to the supreme court were reversed. Thats a 40% success rate, if I had a 40% success rate at my job I would be out on my ass. You don't care that she makes racist comments. All you care about is that it pisses of republicans.

People like you are why this country is going to hell in a handbag, you don't care about America all you care about is you "side " winning
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ