Author Topic: Fox American Morning CapAndTrade.mpg (Read 3125 times)

blacken700 · « **on:** November 30, 2009, 02:20:47 PM »

Raw data dumped??
As though suddenly scientists have no data at all about climate change!!??i thinks the standard "out of context" quotations ploy of Faux and Fundies gets overworked on this ignorant channel.

Love his opening statement, "Let's debate what we THINK we know." that just about says it all about this channel

BM OUT · « **Reply #1 on:** November 30, 2009, 02:23:37 PM »

Quote from: blacken700 on November 30, 2009, 02:20:47 PM

Raw data dumped??
As though suddenly scientists have no data at all about climate change!!??i thinks the standard "out of context" quotations ploy of Faux and Fundies gets overworked on this ignorant channel.

Love his opening statement, "Let's debate what we THINK we know." that just about says it all about this channel

The data on the earths temperature and the mathamatics that were used to come up with their theory based on that temp data was lost.This comes directly from the climate controll "experts".Its lost in cyberspace.

Its an obvious ruse a hoax and holds NO WATER.Al Gore is a fraud the theory is a joke!!!

BodyProSite · « **Reply #2 on:** November 30, 2009, 02:24:51 PM »

yep but funny thing is they have 4x the viewers of any liberal/commie news station, fox probably has more liberals watching than the liberal news stations, hmmmm

blacken700 · « **Reply #3 on:** November 30, 2009, 02:30:32 PM »

Exactly the problem when the extreme right starts to believes their own rhetoric. A generation of the deluded walks the streets of America.[the fox viewer] At one point this was about winning elections. No longer they really believe what they say,

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #4 on:** November 30, 2009, 02:32:57 PM »

Quote from: blacken700 on November 30, 2009, 02:30:32 PM

Exactly the problem when the extreme right starts to believes their own rhetoric. A generation of the deluded walks the streets of America.[the fox viewer] At one point this was about winning elections. No longer they really believe what they say,

No, they have adjusted date that they themselves cooked up. the raw data dump means that objective people cant do an accurate peer review of their findings. Climate change is a hoax.

Kazan · « **Reply #5 on:** November 30, 2009, 02:40:42 PM »

It's the new "science", get rid of anything that contradicts what you want to outcome to be, that way you can never be wrong

blacken700 · « **Reply #6 on:** November 30, 2009, 02:43:41 PM »

like i said before most scientist believe global warming but you want to believe Rush, beck, palin, thats your choice

Kazan · « **Reply #7 on:** November 30, 2009, 02:50:41 PM »

Quote from: blacken700 on November 30, 2009, 02:43:41 PM

like i said before most scientist believe global warming but you want to believe Rush, beck, palin, thats your choice

In the 70's it was the next ice age, now its the global warming. Notice a trend here, the planet cools and heats in cycles. But hey if you want the robber barrons to come in and take your money. Why not just start sending 50% of your income to Al Gore now, why wait?

BodyProSite · « **Reply #8 on:** November 30, 2009, 02:56:32 PM »

liberal socialist commie marxist dont want to give up their money, they want everyones money but their own, and they do not want it to actually save the earth as they say, they need to save their special interst groups!!

blacken700 · « **Reply #9 on:** November 30, 2009, 02:58:16 PM »

What the science says...
1970's ice age predictions were predominantly media based with the majority of scientific papers predicting warming.
The notion that the 1970s scientific consensus was for impending global cooling is incorrect. In actuality, there were significantly more papers in the 1970s predicting warming than cooling.

Most predictions of an impending ice age came from the popular press (eg - Newsweek, NY Times, National Geographic, Time Magazine). As far as peer reviewed scientific papers in the 1970s, very few papers (7 in total) predicted global cooling. Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming due to CO2. More on 1970s science

Kazan · « **Reply #10 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:00:33 PM »

So we are back to "conscensus" again with no concrete proof?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #11 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:01:06 PM »

Quote from: blacken700 on November 30, 2009, 02:58:16 PM

What the science says...
1970's ice age predictions were predominantly media based with the majority of scientific papers predicting warming.
The notion that the 1970s scientific consensus was for impending global cooling is incorrect. In actuality, there were significantly more papers in the 1970s predicting warming than cooling.

Most predictions of an impending ice age came from the popular press (eg - Newsweek, NY Times, National Geographic, Time Magazine). As far as peer reviewed scientific papers in the 1970s, very few papers (7 in total) predicted global cooling. Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming due to CO2. More on 1970s science

Apparently you dont read too much. the Climate Czar - Holdren was one of the people predicting the Ice Age .

BodyProSite · « **Reply #12 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:01:27 PM »

The liberal way!!! DENY, then PASS BLAME, then HURRY TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT, AND HOPE EVERYONE FORGETS, BECAUSE IN ANOTHER WEEK OBAMA WILL ANNOUNCE THE NEXT OH SO URGENT CRISIS TO GET OUR MINDS OFF OF THE MOUNTAIN OF LIES JUST UNCOVERED

blacken700 · « **Reply #13 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:01:35 PM »

liberal socialist commie marxist

you sound like you might be palin's brother, oh and I'm not giving you a complement

Kazan · « **Reply #14 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:02:53 PM »

You do realize what you exhale with every breath don't you? I think to do your part you should stop breathing

blacken700 · « **Reply #15 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:04:27 PM »

haahaahhaa

BodyProSite · « **Reply #16 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:07:27 PM »

NO i dont support Palin I even think I have told you that before, hmmm you are the bright one

BodyProSite · « **Reply #17 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:08:16 PM »

but I wont hold it against you black , your a liberal, so I wouldnt expect much from you

BodyProSite · « **Reply #18 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:10:05 PM »

hell black I am proud of you that you can muster up more than uh uh uh uh um um uuuummmmmm uh uh like your liberal commies daddy obama

blacken700 · « **Reply #19 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:39:01 PM »

you don't have to support her to be her brother

BodyProSite · « **Reply #20 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:50:33 PM »

gosh black that was so funny, but hate to break your heart, i am not her brother either, whats next from you?? uh uh uuuuummmmm uh uh duh um......... come on black, surprise us all with another one of your magnificent blessings of your whacked opinion

Skip8282 · « **Reply #21 on:** November 30, 2009, 04:18:20 PM »

Unbelievable blacken!

First, the most prominent researchers in the field refuse to release the raw data for peer review. Then, they get busted trying to cover up data and squeeze out opposing views. Now, when forced to provide the data because of the freedom of information act, the data mysteriously disappears.

And you still want to try and downplay the matter?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #22 on:** December 01, 2009, 05:05:09 AM »

Quote from: Skip8282 on November 30, 2009, 04:18:20 PM

Unbelievable blacken!

First, the most prominent researchers in the field refuse to release the raw data for peer review. Then, they get busted trying to cover up data and squeeze out opposing views. Now, when forced to provide the data because of the freedom of information act, the data mysteriously disappears.

And you still want to try and downplay the matter?

Skip - people like Blacken were true believers in the whole Day After Tommorow, 2012, AGW and all the other eco nonsense. This is like a 8 yo finding out Santa Claus does not exist. Its devasating to them.

BM OUT · « **Reply #23 on:** December 01, 2009, 06:19:57 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on November 30, 2009, 02:43:41 PM

like i said before most scientist believe global warming but you want to believe Rush, beck, palin, thats your choice

There are at least 25,000 scientists who say its a hoax.The email proves they are getting rid of evidense instead of having it get reviewed or debated.You might think Rush isnt a scientist,but he knows a hell of a lot more then Al Gore.

Kazan · « **Reply #24 on:** December 01, 2009, 08:11:38 AM »

Its because in the liberal groupthink Global Warming has filled in for what most would call their religion

You cant change the mind of someone who has an entrenched dogma - whether its religion preached by the church or religion preached by Al Gore and the global warming zombies

If you dont stand for something then you'll fall for anything