we could be a decade into global government, years of having elements of our lives decided by a government outside our own government and BF and Ozmo would still be in denial. LOL, they don't even see a problem with this climate treaty. They don't see a problem with releasing governmental control in this area over to a global body? Things THAT WILL effect all Americans and countless American businesses... and they don't think any sovereignty is lost by handing decisions affecting us, which would have been made by our representatives, over to a global overseer... wow, just wow... I think they're blinded by their deep seeded contempt for anyone who they consider a conspiracy theorist. So it doesn't matter how many videos like this they see, they won't know it until history is examining the transition to global government decades after it happened and I'm sure they'll conveniently forget they ever mocked people who warned others at the time.
Explain to me this Hugo.
Lets say hypothetically that there is such a thing as leeching of the third world.
Ie, that many countries in Africa are corrupt, and not able to keep their natural riches.
How are we ever going to stop that leeching unless we somehow agree on a global level to restrict how corporations are allowed to go there?
That's the same kind of "Global governance" that you're opposed to.
Let me give you another example.
Tanzania - they have 50 percent taxes.
They don't get anything for it though.
Tanzania could have 10 or 80 percent taxes.
It would not matter.
The problem is that their system is corrupt and that their resources are plundered and leaving for other countries.
My point is this Hugo. And don't get hotheaded or anything. I'm not trying to piss you off, no, really I'm not.
Promise.
Some kind of agreement has to be made on a global level.
Otherwise you're never gonna be able to change how some are being taken advantage of.
Because if eg USA bans their companies from going to Africa and robbing - Chinese companies will seize the opportunity.
Or worst case scenario - the companies who these days are transnational - will just move their headquarters and operate from another country.
So whether you like it or not - some kind of global agreement is necessary.
You're actually making the mistake of equalling all global agreements with globalism.
But Globalism means less regulation - an open market for big TransNationalCompanies.
So what is really wrong when our elected officials are actually getting back a piece of the power from the TNC's?
Look, I don't agree with all that's been done in Europe, USA, Asia, or Africa the last year.
But one thing I think is for the better.
And that is a general trend that perhaps the political power of the TNC's has at least temporarily stopped.