Author Topic: Phil Heath narrow?  (Read 7005 times)

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #25 on: October 02, 2010, 07:16:54 AM »
yes sometimes jay looks good

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17460
  • MAGA
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #26 on: October 02, 2010, 07:18:05 AM »

Man of Steel

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19404
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #27 on: October 02, 2010, 07:25:25 AM »
If Phil Heath has narrow clavicles what do you suggest he do about them?

brent2741

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1619
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #28 on: October 02, 2010, 07:31:09 AM »
If Phil Heath has narrow clavicles what do you suggest he do about them?
kill himself

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #29 on: October 02, 2010, 07:38:27 AM »
Jay got wide ass hips, and Heath got narrow ass shoulders, There both sad excuses for bbers. Short too. Every year the top guys have shittier genetics, When youd think they be getting better. Then we wonder why Sergio, or Ahrnold, would destroy them today.

Man of Steel

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19404
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #30 on: October 02, 2010, 07:40:39 AM »
Jay got wide ass hips, and Heath got narrow ass shoulders, There both sad excuses for bbers. Short too. Every year the top guys have shittier genetics, When youd think they be getting better. Then we wonder why Sergio, or Ahrnold, would destroy them today.

Why would you think competitors' genetics would improve?  

If Sergio and Arnold were in their primes today they would have the same physiques as all the other pros today.

~UN_$ung~

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 5248
  • Been real, been nice...but it hasnt been Real Nice
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #31 on: October 02, 2010, 07:41:02 AM »
Jay got wide ass hips, and Heath got narrow ass shoulders, There both sad excuses for bbers. Short too. Every year the top guys have shittier genetics, When youd think they be getting better. Then we wonder why Sergio, or Ahrnold, would destroy them today.

could you pleae kindly stop posting here

there are enough idiots on getbig..........and your an unwelcome addition


your not smart, your not witty, EVERY opinion you spout off is stupider then the previous one

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17460
  • MAGA
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #32 on: October 02, 2010, 07:59:07 AM »
could you pleae kindly stop posting here

there are enough idiots on getbig..........and your an unwelcome addition


your not smart, your not witty, EVERY opinion you spout off is stupider then the previous one
FYI it's "you're" when you're refering to someone. "Your" is refering to someones belonging or attribute.

Also "stupider" is not correct grammar. Instead use "more stupid" or "dumber".


Jaime

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
  • North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #33 on: October 02, 2010, 09:16:39 AM »
could you pleae kindly stop posting here

there are enough idiots on getbig..........and your an unwelcome addition


your not smart, your not witty, EVERY opinion you spout off is stupider then the previous one



Its pretty clear that Sergio and Arnold's genetics are a lot better than any of the current guys, by some margin.
Trans Milkshake.

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #34 on: October 02, 2010, 09:25:54 AM »
could you pleae kindly stop posting here

there are enough idiots on getbig..........and your an unwelcome addition


your not smart, your not witty, EVERY opinion you spout off is stupider then the previous one
Lolz you need a hug dont you.

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #35 on: October 02, 2010, 09:26:45 AM »
unsung can use a little love.