Author Topic: Making Ignorance Chic  (Read 1603 times)

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Making Ignorance Chic
« on: October 20, 2010, 11:01:57 AM »
October 19, 2010
Making Ignorance Chic
By MAUREEN DOWD

HOLLYWOOD

Casanova’s rule for seduction was to tell a beautiful woman she was intelligent and an intelligent woman she was beautiful.

The false choice between intellectualism and sexuality in women has persisted through the ages. There was no more poignant victim of it than Marilyn Monroe.

She was smart enough to become the most famous Dumb Blonde in history. Photographers loved to get her to pose in tight shorts, a silk robe or a swimsuit with a come-hither look and a weighty book — a history of Goya or James Joyce’s “Ulysses” or Heinrich Heine’s poems. A high-brow bunny picture, a variation on the sexy librarian trope. Men who were nervous about her erotic intensity could feel superior by making fun of her intellectually.

Marilyn was not completely in on the joke. Scarred by her schizophrenic mother and dislocated upbringing, she was happy to have the classics put in her hand. What’s more, she read some of them, from Proust to Dostoyevsky to Freud to Carl Sandburg’s six-volume biography of Lincoln (given to her by husband Arthur Miller), collecting a library of 400 books.

Miller once called Marilyn “a poet on a street corner trying to recite to a crowd pulling at her clothes.”

“Fragments,” a new book of her poems, letters and musings, some written in her childlike hand with misspellings in leather books and others on stationery from the Waldorf-Astoria and the Beverly Hills Hotel, is affecting. The world’s most coveted woman, a picture of luminescence, was lonely and dark. Thinking herself happily married, she was crushed to discover an open journal in which Miller had written that she disappointed him and embarrassed him in front of his intellectual peers.

“I guess I have always been deeply terrified to really be someone’s wife since I know from life one cannot love another, ever, really.”

Her friend Saul Bellow wrote in a letter that Marilyn “conducts herself like a philosopher.” He observed: “She was connected with a very powerful current but she couldn’t disconnect herself from it,” adding: “She had a kind of curious incandescence under the skin.”

The sad sex symbol is still a candle in the wind. There’s a hit novel in Britain narrated by the Maltese terrier Frank Sinatra gave her, which she named “Maf,” for Mafia, and three movies in the works about her. Naomi Watts is planning to star in a biopic based on the novel, “Blonde,” by Joyce Carol Oates; Michelle Williams is shooting “My Week With Marilyn,” and another movie is planned based on an account by Lionel Grandison, a former deputy Los Angeles coroner who claims he was forced to change the star’s death certificate to read suicide instead of murder.

At least, unlike Paris Hilton and her ilk, the Dumb Blonde of ’50s cinema had a firm grasp on one thing: It was cool to be smart. She aspired to read good books and be friends with intellectuals, even going so far as to marry one. But now another famous beauty with glowing skin and a powerful current, Sarah Palin, has made ignorance fashionable.

You struggle to name Supreme Court cases, newspapers you read and even founding fathers you admire? No problem. You endorse a candidate for the Pennsylvania Senate seat who is the nominee in West Virginia? Oh, well.

At least you’re not one of those “spineless” elites with an Ivy League education, like President Obama, who can’t feel anything. It’s news to Christine O’Donnell that the Constitution guarantees separation of church and state. It’s news to Joe Miller, whose guards handcuffed a journalist, and to Carl Paladino, who threatened The New York Post’s Fred Dicker, that the First Amendment exists, even in Tea Party Land. Michele Bachmann calls Smoot-Hawley Hoot-Smalley.

Sharron Angle sank to new lows of obliviousness when she told a classroom of Hispanic kids in Las Vegas: “Some of you look a little more Asian to me.”

As Palin tweeted in July about her own special language adding examples from W. and Obama: “ ‘Refudiate,’ ‘misunderestimate,’ ‘wee-wee’d up.’ English is a living language. Shakespeare liked to coin new words too. Got to celebrate it!”

On Saturday, at a G.O.P. rally in Anaheim, Calif., Palin mockingly noted that you won’t find her invoking Mao or Saul Alinsky. She says she believes in American exceptionalism. But when it comes to the people running the country, exceptionalism is suspect; leaders should be — as Palin, O’Donnell and Angle keep saying — just like you.

In Marilyn’s America, there were aspirations. The studios tackled literary novels rather than one-liners like “He’s Just Not That Into You” and navel-gazing drivel like “Eat Pray Love.” Walt Disney’s “Fantasia” paired cartoon characters with famous composers. Even Bugs Bunny did Wagner.

But in Sarah’s America, we’ve refudiated all that.
!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40027
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2010, 11:11:53 AM »
 ::)  ::)

How is the 10% UE, massive deficit, massive increase in national debt, massive increase in people on welfare, etc, working out for Obama you fucking hack? 

I can't wait for 2 weeks from now?   

Your faux mocha, half black, half assed, faked college record, incompetent, inept, ignorant, asshole in chief will be a lame duck for good. 

 

BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2010, 11:13:38 AM »
The real ignorance is shown by this author.There is NOTHING in the constitution that says "there is a seperation of church and state".Of course,libs have twisted this for years.The first ammemdment dictates that government can not have a state religion.There is NOTHING in it that says seperation of church and state.Incredibly,this author gives no mention of the fact that ODonnels opponent could not name the five freedoms the first amendment gurantes but he is portrayed as brilliant.Typica left wing stupidity.

What is amazing is that the supreme court,rules to allow companies to be able to give to campaings and our ignorant fool of a president thinks he knows the law better then men like John Roberts and Sam Alito and  the stupid,uninformed lib idiots in the media side with the little community organiser instead of REAL experts on the law.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40027
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2010, 11:14:53 AM »
2 WEEKS FROM NOW EVERY SINGLE COMMUNIST DEMOCRAT HACK IS GOING DOWN TO THE TOILET. 

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2010, 11:15:06 AM »
More nonsense from the "elite"
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19263
  • Getbig!
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2010, 11:19:44 AM »
::)  ::)

How is the 10% UE, massive deficit, massive increase in national debt, massive increase in people on welfare, etc, working out for Obama you fucking hack? 

I can't wait for 2 weeks from now?   

Your faux mocha, half black, half assed, faked college record, incompetent, inept, ignorant, asshole in chief will be a lame duck for good. 

 

Dana Perino wrote an article about "What Happened to Maureen Dowd?", a few days ago.

Rush has claimed, for the last two days, that he knows what happened to her. But, out of respect and manners, he isn't going to dish the details. From his initial statements, he's implying that Dowd became a femme-nazi, as a result of her getting dogged by some guy, after he got them drawers. Rush even hinted that he know the guy who did it and that he bragged about it.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40027
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #6 on: October 20, 2010, 11:23:35 AM »
Dana Perino wrote an article about "What Happened to Maureen Dowd?", a few days ago.

Rush has claimed, for the last two days, that he knows what happened to her. But, out of respect and manners, he isn't going to dish the details. From his initial statements, he's implying that Dowd became a femme-nazi, as a result of her getting dogged by some guy, after he got them drawers. Rush even hinted that he know the guy who did it and that he bragged about it.

Its called liberal white guilt run amok in the face of disaster of ones' decisions. 

All the guilt ridden whites rushed out to vote for obama based on nothing but bogus speeches and lies and are latching on to anything to make themselfves feel better aboutt he disaster they foisted on the nation by voting for such a complete disaster as Obama. 

 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40027
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #7 on: October 20, 2010, 11:40:26 AM »

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/oct/19/tea-party-movement-sarahpalin


Why Tea Party women lead the chargeSarah Palin is an icon, but she's not the reason – women have simply had enough of being taxed and told what's good for us
Tammy Bruce guardian.co.uk,
Tuesday 19 October 2010


________________________ ________________________ _

 
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin speaks to the crowd during the kickoff of the nationwide Tea Party Express bus tour in Reno, Nevada this week. Photograph: Scott Sady/AP
 
We are 13 days out from 2 November, a date all observers (with the quaint exception of the White House) admit will be a midterm election political "tsunami", and we are seeing a genuine meltdown of both the media and political elite, two groups not happy at all with the new American revolution called the Tea Party. Especially irritating to American Nobility is the fact that women are in front of this storm, leading the way and calling out the political establishment for disdain and punishment on election day.

On Monday, after over a year and a half of the Tea Party emerging as a political force, a cable television roundtable of "experts" in media wondered why the heck so many women were involved in the Tea Party. CBS's Lesley Stahl baffled her panel constructed of a New York Times reporter, someone from Newsweek and other Anointed Ones, when she asked, "I wanted to ask all the gurus here, why so many of the Tea Partiers are women. I find that just intriguing and don't quite understand why that has happened," Stahl said. Their first answer: "Sarah Palin?"

Actually, the answer is: taxed enough already. Women control the household accounts and we know when spending is unsustainable, threatening the very fabric of our families, or our country as the case may be. As one Tea Party rally sign aimed at big government succinctly put it, "My kid isn't your ATM."

The Tea Party represents stakeholders in the American system; people who were never involved in politics or thought they had to be, yet realised that political corruption and incompetence threatened not only their families, but the future of the nation itself. Economic collapse, the shocking spending by an Obama administration that most analysts agree is in over its head, combined with remarkable contempt shown citizens during the debacle of the healthcare debate and legislation, have mobilised those stakeholders – including women and their families – to take action.

While the Tea Party has no leaders, per se, it is clear to most that (former) Governor Sarah Palin embodies the nature and intent of the movement. An American woman hailing from Alaska (the epitome of the Wild West), Palin accomplished the feminist ideal – leading a life that best suited her, combining work and family while not hesitating to reach for political power and influence as well. Her biggest crime, as seen by both political machines and the American left? She does it as a Reagan Republican and as a woman of faith.

Following Palin's tactical lead and encouragement, Tea Party-supported candidates, many of them women, won their primaries and will likely be victorious in November. While CBS's Stahl was simply confused by the presence of women, others in media have reacted differently. In one of her more bizarre pieces, Maureen Dowd of the New York Times complains about the "Republican Mean Girls", all the while being, well, mean to women who are Republicans. I suppose a little projection is the least we should expect from the narcissists-in-charge. Referring to Palin and a host of Republican women candidates, Dowd writes:

"We are in the era of Republican Mean Girls, grown-up versions of those teenage tormentors who would steal your boyfriend, spray-paint your locker and, just for good measure, spread rumours that you were pregnant."

Is it just me or did we just find out what Dowd's high school experience was like?

Ultimately, attacks on Tea Party candidates and activists are par for the course, but there has been a tactic used against conservative women candidates – they are cast as either sex maniacs or simply crazy and, yes, mean. Sarah Palin, Nikki Haley, Sharron Angle, Jan Brewer, Christine O'Donnell and others have weathered the so-called liberal and feminist strategy of trying to destroy women using the same misogynist tactics they've decried over the years. Americans have seen through those assaults, and grow even more committed to taking this nation back from an arrogant elite who have driven it to the edge.

The liberal feminist movement never imagined that women would take seriously the encouragement to become our own heroes and claim life for ourselves, on our terms, no matter who we are. Pro-choice and pro-life, Christian and not, poor and rich, black, white, gay and straight. It is a dream we all hold dear, and it's called the Tea Party.

James

  • Guest
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #8 on: October 20, 2010, 11:52:03 AM »
Dana Perino wrote an article about "What Happened to Maureen Dowd?", a few days ago.

Rush has claimed, for the last two days, that he knows what happened to her. But, out of respect and manners, he isn't going to dish the details. From his initial statements, he's implying that Dowd became a femme-nazi, as a result of her getting dogged by some guy, after he got them drawers. Rush even hinted that he know the guy who did it and that he bragged about it.

What happened to her? Easy, it's what's happened to all progressives/liberals/socialists - they're angry because their agenda is failing. They're angry because the people they put in office to push their agenda are largely unqualified to lead, and are horribly ineffective in addressing the nation. Obama is one of the most polarizing president we've had. He and his minions strive to divide us - politically, economically, racially. America is reacting in a normal, sane way by rejecting the message and messenger. Dowd, like all progressives, is too ignorant to realize they are in the minority and can't get their way all the time. They're petulant little spoiled brats, and it's time to put them all on a very long time-out.

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19263
  • Getbig!
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #9 on: October 20, 2010, 12:17:24 PM »
The real ignorance is shown by this author.There is NOTHING in the constitution that says "there is a seperation of church and state".Of course,libs have twisted this for years.The first ammemdment dictates that government can not have a state religion.There is NOTHING in it that says seperation of church and state.Incredibly,this author gives no mention of the fact that ODonnels opponent could not name the five freedoms the first amendment gurantes but he is portrayed as brilliant.Typica left wing stupidity.

What is amazing is that the supreme court,rules to allow companies to be able to give to campaings and our ignorant fool of a president thinks he knows the law better then men like John Roberts and Sam Alito and  the stupid,uninformed lib idiots in the media side with the little community organiser instead of REAL experts on the law.

For all those numbskulls yapping about seperation of church and state, particularly at that school were O'Donnell and Coons were, I wonder if they just caught Sean Hannity's old clip of Al Gore getting the Holy Ghost at a black church, talking about how the Republican agenda was the wrong one for black people.

This, of course, was in between wails of "WHEN THE GLORY OF THE LORD SHALL BE REVEALED!!!!". I nearly spit out my protein shake, in laughter. I mean, the only thing missing would have been Gore speaking in tongues.


BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #10 on: October 20, 2010, 12:21:20 PM »
For all those numbskulls yapping about seperation of church and state, particularly at that school were O'Donnell and Coons were, I wonder if they just caught Sean Hannity's old clip of Al Gore getting the Holy Ghost at a black church, talking about how the Republican agenda was the wrong one for black people.

This, of course, was in between wails of "WHEN THE GLORY OF THE LORD SHALL BE REVEALED!!!!". I nearly spit out my protein shake, in laughter. I mean, the only thing missing would have been Gore speaking in tongues.



There was another time when Gore was at a black church and he was screaming about the confederate flag in South Carolina.He was screaming [in his poor attempt at black voice]"The rupblicans didnt see no sign of oppression.SOMETHINGS WRRRRROOOOOONGG,SOOOOOMETHIIIIINGS WROOOONG".God what an idiot.The whiteest white man on earth trying to sound like Martin Luther King.

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2010, 12:37:49 PM »
It's not surprising that Radio thinks Maureen Dowd is intelligent. Benny why don't you make better use of your time and try to find another picture of the NY skyline in Sao Paulo Brazil. Afterward, you explain how everyone else is retarded. ::)

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #12 on: October 21, 2010, 12:52:39 PM »
::)  ::)

How is the 10% UE, massive deficit, massive increase in national debt, massive increase in people on welfare, etc, working out for Obama you fucking hack? 

I can't wait for 2 weeks from now?   

Your faux mocha, half black, half assed, faked college record, incompetent, inept, ignorant, asshole in chief will be a lame duck for good. 

 
LOL!  ;D

!

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #13 on: October 21, 2010, 12:54:16 PM »
It's not surprising that Radio thinks Maureen Dowd is intelligent. Benny why don't you make better use of your time and try to find another picture of the NY skyline in Sao Paulo Brazil. Afterward, you explain how everyone else is retarded. ::)
Take it easy Sam, its not that serious.  :P

!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40027
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Making Ignorance Chic
« Reply #14 on: October 21, 2010, 12:54:21 PM »
Truth hurts doesnt it?