Author Topic: Jay Cutler on Flex's cover - Unbelievable Massive!  (Read 13750 times)

IndustryInsider

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 136
  • and one and two
Re: Jay Cutler on Flex's cover - Unbelievable Massive!
« Reply #50 on: October 22, 2010, 09:31:52 AM »
looks like AMI is leaving California for NYC..

Pecker plan

Rumors have been swirling for weeks that American Media CEO David Pecker was getting ready to pull out of the offices in Woodland Hills, Calif., that he has been renting from vitamin king Joe Weider ever since he purchased Weider Publications in 2002 for $350 million.

Over the past two years, budgets and staff have been cut after Weider's biggest advertiser, Hydroxycut, under pressure from the FDA, issued a voluntary recall of its product in 2009 and halted advertising for a year. Some 500 ad pages disappeared from Muscle & Fitness. Staffers complained that no raises have been handed out for at least the past two years.

Earlier this month, vice president of human resources Ken Slivken flew in and began interviewing everyone working on Muscle & Fitness, Flex, Fit Pregnancy and Natural Health.

"The claim was 'auditing' but the rumors abound that he plans to move the magazines from their Woodland Hills offices to New York so he can keep a closer eye on them," said one insider.

Yesterday, at least some of the prediction came true when Muscle & Fitness workers were informed that the title's 12-member editorial staff will be moving to New York in January and getting a new editorial director.

Seth Kelly, a one-time top editor at Maxim, who had recently been running the Ultimate Fighting quarterly that American Media produces in New York, will be the new editorial director of Muscle & Fitness.

Kelly is also being named the editorial director of Flex and Muscle & Fitness Hers, although Allan Donelly will continue to serve as editor of Flex and Muscle & Fitness Hers. If any of the staffers of Muscle & Fitness make the move East, they may not want to unpack their boxes. They will be mov ing into One Park Ave. in January, but AMI has already signed a long-term lease to move far downtown to 4 New York Plaza in May.

AMI, which has about 70,000 square feet at its current Manhattan address will be taking over two floors with about 80,000 square feet when it moves into the 20-story office tower. The expectation is that the remaining Woodlands Hills staffers will be filling that space next spring.

kkelly@nypost.com


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/bauer_takes_aim_at_male_readers_4xAunXH7K4FVHyCQPaeJDM?CMP=OTC-rss&FEEDNAME=#ixzz136dRD6ky

Royal Lion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
Re: Jay Cutler on Flex's cover - Unbelievable Massive!
« Reply #51 on: October 22, 2010, 11:33:11 AM »
What photoshop??

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Jay Cutler on Flex's cover - Unbelievable Massive!
« Reply #52 on: October 22, 2010, 11:33:53 AM »

hench

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8459
Re: Jay Cutler on Flex's cover - Unbelievable Massive!
« Reply #53 on: October 22, 2010, 11:51:19 AM »
thanks for finding that comparison pic.
 Just proves how far they have gone. Given him vascularity he can only dream of, lost inches off his waist, made one eye higher than the other, given him paper thin skin and leaned him right out getting rid of the bloated look all over!
What photoshop??

Royal Lion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
Re: Jay Cutler on Flex's cover - Unbelievable Massive!
« Reply #54 on: October 22, 2010, 12:02:58 PM »
thanks for finding that comparison pic.
 Just proves how far they have gone. Given him vascularity he can only dream of, lost inches off his waist, made one eye higher than the other, given him paper thin skin and leaned him right out getting rid of the bloated look all over!
It's totally lame.  Jay is great, and I think he at times won deservingly, so why modify him so much?  Perhaps it's because the demographics of Flex's readers are teenagers who think that one day, with enough Muscletech, they too will look like that.   ;D

hench

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8459
Re: Jay Cutler on Flex's cover - Unbelievable Massive!
« Reply #55 on: October 22, 2010, 01:03:15 PM »
I wonder if Jay likes the fact he is shopped. Can't be a good feeling when your supposed to be the best but need touching up to make the front cover

kimura

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 478

kmhphoto

  • Expert
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1546
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Jay Cutler on Flex's cover - Unbelievable Massive!
« Reply #57 on: October 23, 2010, 03:54:40 AM »
It's real!
http://www.errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/4829d87/
 ::)

Unfortunately your use of that site to indicate if the image was manipulated is flawed because it bases its results on estimating how many times a JPG image has been saved which is pointless.
The usual workflow would be take a Raw file, convert to Tiff, work on it as necessary and then output to finished file type which would usually be TIFF for publishing, JPG for web.

Here are two examples that illustrate how dumb the method is on that site. It can't differentiate which image has been manipulated but I'm sure most people on here can.

http://www.errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/68ee10f/

http://www.errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/c41fadc/




~UN_$ung~

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 5248
  • Been real, been nice...but it hasnt been Real Nice
Re: Jay Cutler on Flex's cover - Unbelievable Massive!
« Reply #58 on: October 23, 2010, 04:07:58 AM »
It's real!
http://www.errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/4829d87/
 ::)





no, its not,,,,,,,,,,not even slightly real



did a cosmetic surgeon shave jays hip bones for that photo shoot?


you would have to be retarded to not see how that is altered













and the guy above just owned you.......

Lion666

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • You gotta bring it to get it!
Re: Jay Cutler on Flex's cover - Unbelievable Massive!
« Reply #59 on: October 23, 2010, 12:45:09 PM »
It's real!
http://www.errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/4829d87/
 ::)



digi is digi though,,, as long a something is saved with the exact same specs as the orig,,, u can save 1000s of times quality stays the same,,, theats a benefit of digi

so if they got that part wrong,,, not a strectch that they have the actual "test" wrong tooo