Author Topic: Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’  (Read 472 times)

James

  • Guest
Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’
« on: March 30, 2011, 04:02:48 PM »
CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama, as an Illinois state senator in 2002, said that using military force to topple a murderous dictator amounted to a “dumb war” and should be opposed.

The “dumb war” Obama was criticizing was the planned invasion of Iraq and the murderous dictator was its leader, Saddam Hussein. Obama, speaking at an anti-war rally in Chicago on Oct. 2, 2002 said that while Saddam was a brutal tyrant, that was not enough to justify using military force to remove him from power.

Now, let me be clear – I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein,” said Obama in his speech. “He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied U.N. resolutions, thwarted U.N. inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.”

"... After September 11th, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported this administration's pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such tragedy from happening again," said Obama. "I don't oppose all wars.  ... What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne."

Obama argued that deposing Saddam militarily was not necessary, because Iraq posed no “direct threat” to the United States. Obama also cited Iraq’s weakened economy and the fact that it was still possible to contain Saddam’s aggression, repudiating the Bush administration’s rationale that Saddam posed too great a threat to American interests and his own people to be left in power.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military is a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history,” said Sen. Obama.

However, as president of the United States, Obama has discounted those same arguments he once made against using military force against brutal dictators.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-2002-toppling-brutal-dictator-dumb

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2011, 04:06:44 PM »
It's only dumb when the other guy does it
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39901
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2011, 04:25:43 PM »
Only dumb when bush did it.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39901
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2011, 04:56:55 PM »
Just read that CIA soldiers are on the way to lybia.  Boots on the ground.  Ill post It later.


W T F.

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2011, 05:01:23 PM »
Just read that CIA soldiers are on the way to lybia.  Boots on the ground.  Ill post It later.


W T F.

The rebels are incompetent, the only way they are going to do anything is if the NATO sends in people. Starting to sound strangely like Vietnam, isn't that how it all started, with "adviser's"
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39901
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2011, 05:07:08 PM »
Yup.  Within a week it went from NFZ to cia soldiers on the ground.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22727
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2011, 05:09:27 PM »
Only dumb when bush did it.

Not in my world.


Who is supporting the Lybian involvement here?

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63977
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2011, 05:11:50 PM »
Is the media going to call him on this I wonder?

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22727
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2011, 05:12:42 PM »
I would think at least Fox would.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63977
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’
« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2011, 05:33:19 PM »
I would think at least Fox would.

I hope so.  Just amazing that this man rode anti-war sentiment into office and started the same kind of war without knowing who the heck he is actually supporting. 

One Big A_ _ Mistake America.   :-\

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Obama in 2002: Toppling Brutal Dictator a ‘Dumb War’
« Reply #10 on: March 30, 2011, 05:54:28 PM »
Just read that CIA soldiers are on the way to lybia.  Boots on the ground.  Ill post It later.


W T F.

Not surprising. But I'd bet they've had CIA and special forces guys on the ground for a while now. They're just finally admitting it.

CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama, as an Illinois state senator in 2002, said that using military force to topple a murderous dictator amounted to a “dumb war” and should be opposed.

The “dumb war” Obama was criticizing was the planned invasion of Iraq and the murderous dictator was its leader, Saddam Hussein. Obama, speaking at an anti-war rally in Chicago on Oct. 2, 2002 said that while Saddam was a brutal tyrant, that was not enough to justify using military force to remove him from power.

Now, let me be clear – I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein,” said Obama in his speech. “He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied U.N. resolutions, thwarted U.N. inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.”

"... After September 11th, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported this administration's pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such tragedy from happening again," said Obama. "I don't oppose all wars.  ... What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne."

Obama argued that deposing Saddam militarily was not necessary, because Iraq posed no “direct threat” to the United States. Obama also cited Iraq’s weakened economy and the fact that it was still possible to contain Saddam’s aggression, repudiating the Bush administration’s rationale that Saddam posed too great a threat to American interests and his own people to be left in power.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military is a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history,” said Sen. Obama.

However, as president of the United States, Obama has discounted those same arguments he once made against using military force against brutal dictators.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-2002-toppling-brutal-dictator-dumb

It's a pathetic double standard. What are the odds you won't hear a single word out of the mouths of all the leftist trash that condemned Bush for the same thing?