Author Topic: 1995 Mr. Olympia Screenshots  (Read 16375 times)

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: 1995 Mr. Olympia Screenshots
« Reply #150 on: April 23, 2011, 12:04:05 AM »
;D ;D

you are biased because you put the line on dorian's right arm and not the torn one ;D

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: 1995 Mr. Olympia Screenshots
« Reply #151 on: April 23, 2011, 12:13:31 AM »
of course he does , Hulkster did as well , they all do. they create these imaginary flaws and reduce Yates to nothing but a back and calves yet he managed to fool the judges for years on end hahahahahahaha they can't look past their biases and their ignorance

so-and-so has better this , that and those yet NOT one of them managed to beat Dorian why? because this isn't a parts contest it's a bodybuilding contest and people harp about Dorian's bicep and Nasser beats him in the front double biceps pose all the while ignoring his outright flaws in this pose because it doesn't mean that much to them but the judges are another thing

Dorian's shorter bicep in the front double biceps pose is less of a flaw than Nasser's long torso and short legs , how about Nasser's piss-poor forearms? that effects his balance & proportion , what him and the vast majority still can't grasp is ALL ROUNDS ARE PHYSIQUE ROUNDS , balance & proportion , density & dryness , muscular bulk , posing and presentation are ALL judged at the exact same time so while Nasser might meet part of it better than Dorian , Dorian wins ALL of it better hence why he dominated unlike anyone before or since



did u ever say that yates was only calves and back :-\.. i always say that at his best he was great and may be the best mr. olympia ever..

dorian's left biceps was not just short,.. it was deformed because he injured himself.. not short naturally!!.. as for balance and proportion nasser forearms went fine with his arms and the rest of him.. on the other side dorian's calves in some contests were clearly huge for his quads.. and yes nasser's legs were a little short for his upper body but this is only one structure flaw not two as you see.. you can say his legs were short AND his torso was long!!.. if his torso was a little shorter his legs were not be considered short and vise versa.. when you say short,.. it's relatively short and long is relatively short.. but his legs separately can't be see as short and his upper body is not long as a separate thing..

as for dorian sure his chest and especially his shoulders were somehow small for his width and his huge back.. still at his best they all went well together..