Bin Laden dead?!

[Fury]

Unfortunately, the fact is just that no matter who was in the White House, that would be the person getting all the press.

Obama didn't do anything except not stop attacks... That's what he did.

Exactly. He signed a piece of paper authorizing a mission. Good job for not fucking up like Clinton. That's where my praise ends. I'd rather praise the Seals that carried out the mission, the CIA that's been in Pakistan for 10 years and the other soldiers fighting in Afghanistan.

[tonymctones]

You think that more terrorists have been killed in 2 years under Obama, than 6 under Bush? Seriously?

Please site these sources for this revelation... I find it a bit difficult to take at face value.

lol wait with baited breath the response to this...

tu get ready to be called a hater bro

[tu_holmes]

lol wait with baited breath the response to this...

tu get ready to be called a hater bro

If this makes me a hater than so be it... I think everyone knows I call it like I see it... You do right, I'm with you... you do wrong, I let it be known you fucked up.

[Option D]

this is hilarious.. if there is a cloudy day.. its obamas fault, if i stub my toe, its obamas fault.. but,......lol..you see where im going with this right

[andreisdaman]

You think that more terrorists have been killed in 2 years under Obama, than 6 under Bush? Seriously?

Please site these sources for this revelation... I find it a bit difficult to take at face value.

here is a link to a WASHINGTON POST STORY ON HOW OBAMA HAS STEPPED UP AUTHORIZATION OF THE TARGETED KILLINGS OF TERRORISTS AND HAS KILLED MORE TERRORISTS THAN THE BUSH ADMIN..as you guys know the Washington Post is THE most respected newspaper in the United States..ALSO I FOUND ARTICLES IN WHICH Republicans are saying that Obama is killing too many terrorists


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/13/AR2010021303748.html

[andreisdaman]

Here is another article which says that Obama is killing terrorists at a far higher level than the Bush administration EVER did.....again the ECONOMIST is a well-respected newspaper respected by Republicans and conservatives....



http://www.economist.com/node/15579751/print

so there ya go...two articles by two different well-respected newspapers backing up the statement I made that Obama has killed more terrorists than Bush

waiting for you all to take your feet out of your mouths..AGAIN...it is just becoming so easy to make you guys look DUMB!!!

[tu_holmes]

here is a link to a WASHINGTON POST STORY ON HOW OBAMA HAS STEPPED UP AUTHORIZATION OF THE TARGETED KILLINGS OF TERRORISTS AND HAS KILLED MORE TERRORISTS THAN THE BUSH ADMIN..as you guys know the Washington Post is THE most respected newspaper in the United States..ALSO I FOUND ARTICLES IN WHICH Republicans are saying that Obama is killing too many terrorists


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/13/AR2010021303748.html

That's not what I got from it... It says, "More killings than captures".

Now I just skimmed it, but I didn't see where it says that Obama has killed more than Bush did.

It does say that Obama has authorized more attacks than Bush did in "His final years", but again... That doesn't say he's killed more terrorists than Bush.

Sorry dude... but you're lying here.

[tu_holmes]

Here is another article which says that Obama is killing terrorists at a far higher level than the Bush administration EVER did.....again the ECONOMIST is a well-respected newspaper respected by Republicans and conservatives....



http://www.economist.com/node/15579751/print

so there ya go...two articles by two different well-respected newspapers backing up the statement I made that Obama has killed more terrorists than Bush

waiting for you all to take your feet out of your mouths..AGAIN...it is just becoming so easy to make you guys look DUMB!!!

Where?

The article said, and I will quote.

"Mr Obama orders assassinations at a far brisker pace than George Bush ever did."

It says he orders them... it does not on ANY level say that he has killed more terrorists than Bush.

Why do you stretch the truth?

[andreisdaman]

Where?

The article said, and I will quote.

"Mr Obama orders assassinations at a far brisker pace than George Bush ever did."

It says he orders them... it does not on ANY level say that he has killed more terrorists than Bush.

Why do you stretch the truth?

dude....ordering and killing are basically the same thing...many more terrorists have been killed through Obama's increased drone attacks....did you read the ECONOMIST article???

[andreisdaman]

ALSO I WANT TO COMPLAIN TO THE MOD WHO CHANGED MY THREAD TITLE.....THERE WAS NO NEED TO DO SO SINCE IT WAS NOT OVERLY NEGATIVE AND I HAVE HAD MANY OTHER TITLES ON HERE WITH THE SAME MONICKER   IF YOU CAN'T TAKE THE HEAT GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN

[tu_holmes]

dude....ordering and killing are basically the same thing...many more terrorists have been killed through Obama's increased drone attacks....did you read the ECONOMIST article???

Yes... Ordering assassinations over the past 2 years doesn't equate to actually taking out targets.

Also, the past 2 years does not equate to the previous 6.

[Soul Crusher]

ALSO I WANT TO COMPLAIN TO THE MOD WHO CHANGED MY THREAD TITLE.....THERE WAS NO NEED TO DO SO SINCE IT WAS NOT OVERLY NEGATIVE AND I HAVE HAD MANY OTHER TITLES ON HERE WITH THE SAME MONICKER   IF YOU CAN'T TAKE THE HEAT GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN

Why dont you just consolidate all of them into one "All things 3333 Thread"  ? / /     

[andreisdaman]

Why dont you just consolidate all of them into one "All things 3333 Thread"  ? / /     

Nah.....the more threads out there bashing you and making you look bad, the better