Author Topic: Liberal nutjob Dennis Kucinich heaps praise on Syria's mass-murdering dictator  (Read 589 times)

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
(The Hill) —Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) gave a press conference in Syria this week and appeared to heap praise upon Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who is being widely criticized for the brutal crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrations in that country. Kucinich said his words were mistranslated.

Kucinich embarked on a trip, which he called a “fact-finding mission,” to Syria and Lebanon this week, even as prominent Republicans are calling upon the Obama administration to recall the U.S. ambassador to Syria because of the repressive actions of the Assad regime.

Kucinich’s plans included meetings with the presidents of both Syria and Lebanon. He met with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Monday. According to the State Department, Kucinich was not accompanied at the meeting by Robert Ford, the U.S. Ambassador to Syria.

“Nor has he given us a debrief, nor was he carrying any administration messages,” State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Tuesday.

A story by the Syrian Arab News Agency on Tuesday has Kucinich at a press conference in Syria taking a highly controversial position toward al-Assad. In May, the U.S. imposed sanctions against al-Assad as a means of pressuring him to end the violent repression there.

“President al-Assad is highly loved and appreciated by the Syrians,” Kucinich said, according to the Syrian news site. “President Bashar al-Assad cares so much about what is taking place in Syria, which is evident in his effort towards a new Syria and everybody who meets him can be certain of this.”

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/168901-kucinich-has-language-problem-in-syria-



Gunning down your own constituents in the streets = loving your people.

If only this twat had choked to death on that olive pit.

Will Assad be charged with war crimes like Gadhafi? Yeah, right. Not like he's killed more of his own people or anything.  ::)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39974
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Assad is a reformer and the state department is confident he will usher in reforms along w iran and hamas.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
(The Hill) —Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) gave a press conference in Syria this week and appeared to heap praise upon Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who is being widely criticized for the brutal crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrations in that country. Kucinich said his words were mistranslated.

Don't worry - the minute obama decides to start a war on this guy, you'll have getbiggers with "Winning" over the murderer's picture...

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Don't worry - the minute obama decides to start a war on this guy, you'll have getbiggers with "Winning" over the murderer's picture...

\/


Jesus fucking christ, quit with the fucking "333 is a male.  Males have killed other humans.  Therefore 333 kills people.  Is that what you're saying 33???  You are a male, right?  Admit it!"  bullshit. 


He said he's AGAINST the US going to war against the US Constitution without congressional approval.   
That has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with being for every single act of war that congress approves.


There is a difference between an absolute stance and situational stances. 


I can't speak for 33, but since he's not being even the slightest bit ambiguous in his stance and since most of us learn the difference between absolute values and situational considerations by kindergarten, I'm pretty sure he feels similar to my stance on the matter:

I'm AGAINST the US going to war in violation of our constitution.  That means that I'm against going to war without congressional approval as part of that absolute.   

If there IS congressional approval AND there is no violation of the constitution, i.e., when I must make "situational considerations" on a declaration of war in which no violation of my "absolute value" on following the constitution occurred, I make a decision based on the GIVEN SITUATIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. 



For the life of me, I can't understand how a man in his 30s can continue to write post after post after post of the same entirely unrelated jumps in logic like "So you are for EVERY SINGLE WAR that congress approves because you don't want the president to violate the constitution???" and think it "deserves" a reply.  I just don't understand it? 



:D

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Don't worry - the minute obama decides to start a war on this guy, you'll have getbiggers with "Winning" over the murderer's picture...

Why don't you tell me exactly how many fucking wars can the US fight at one time? I don't give a shit about the Syrians or the Libyans, let them sort their own shit out. No matter what the US does, 10 minutes after the cavemen get their "democracy" it will turn into an Islamic theocracy and the US will be the Great Satan again. Let them kill each other off, I see that as win for the US.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Why don't you tell me exactly how many fucking wars can the US fight at one time? I don't give a shit about the Syrians or the Libyans, let them sort their own shit out. No matter what the US does, 10 minutes after the cavemen get their "democracy" it will turn into an Islamic theocracy and the US will be the Great Satan again. Let them kill each other off, I see that as win for the US.

According to 240, that's been Obama's plan all along. Or something.  ::)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
According to 240, that's been Obama's plan all along. Or something.  ::)

do I believe obama is happy that a shitload of libyans are killing each other? 

of course i do.

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
do I believe obama is happy that a shitload of libyans are killing each other? 

of course i do.

If thats the case why does NATO need to bomb them? Go nothing better to do? Need to use up some munitions that are at their expiration date? Face it, Kadaffi pissed off the EU, they want him gone. So of course "NATO" gets involved, days not weeks, weeks not months, months not years? WTF, sure lets just let the POTUS start bombing shit all over the globe when he feels like it ::)
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ