there's some serious lines of thought around this. In the direction that brings back a vote for a candidate that reflects the people's wishes. But as you've stated it, it's way to simplified and open to a billion attacks. Can you detail it a bit for more serious comment? what do you have in mind? As stated now, if you just ban all money, you just open it up for the richest candidate to win most of the time... That would not be cool either.