Author Topic: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..  (Read 2379 times)

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« on: October 01, 2011, 11:13:18 PM »
which version of his back was the best??.. in 96 was conditioned too but a little small for his normal..

i go with 93 as his overall best back shape..

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2493
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2011, 11:41:41 PM »
1995 For Conditioning/shape/Detail and going AGAINST the trend 1997 (ironically his Worst shape @ a Olympia) in Terms for outright massiveness/size with good Condition in the Back @ 270lbs.

POTA

  • Guest
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2011, 12:07:58 AM »
I never liked how asymmetrical that trap on the right makes his back look. It extends down about an inch further than the one on the left. Is that genetics? Or from bad habit and bad form over a long period of time?

20inch calves

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4740
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2011, 12:14:57 AM »
I never liked how asymmetrical that trap on the right makes his back look. It extends down about an inch further than the one on the left. Is that genetics? Or from bad habit and bad form over a long period of time?

leverone has it also :-\
irongearco.com

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2011, 12:19:02 AM »
leverone has it also :-\

nasser dosent have it  ;D

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2011, 02:10:59 AM »
nasser dosent have it  ;D

Nasser never had a back to begin with.  ;)

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2493
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2011, 03:40:46 AM »
1995 and 96 Conditioning was Excellent (Pics C/O ND)

david94

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 462
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2011, 04:19:17 AM »
1995

yates fan

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2011, 09:32:39 AM »
of the three i would say 94,for size and conditioning,but 97 probably the best overall.

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19935
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2011, 10:07:02 AM »
93 was the greatest improvement, after that the era of the guts started..

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2011, 10:30:12 AM »
His back looked the best in 95'.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #11 on: October 02, 2011, 06:47:07 PM »
93
look how dry his traps were.

but ronnie is still better :P
Flower Boy Ran Away

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2493
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2011, 07:08:57 PM »
93
look how dry his traps were.

but ronnie is still better :P
He LOOKED better in Certain shots in Certain years, Unfortunately in Reality he NEVER actually Beat Yates but @ least there's the Pics and other Dialog to speculate on to the end of time.

unrageable

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 443
Re: Dorian's Back in 93, 94, and, 95!!..
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2011, 07:12:54 PM »
any Dorian is amazing.  1995 and the gp are my favourites.