Author Topic: Crony Capitalism on Capital Hill - Obama & Pelosi are knee deep in this S$%^  (Read 1426 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Crony capitalism exposed
By Marc A. Thiessen, Monday, November 14, 11:36 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/crony-capitalism-exposed/2011/11/14/gIQACiK4KN_print.html





Insider trading is illegal — except for members of Congress. A Wall Street executive who buys or sells stock based on insider information would face a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation and quite possibly a federal prosecutor. But senators and congressmen are free to legally trade stock based on nonpublic information they have obtained through their official positions as elected officials — and they do so on a regular basis.

On Sunday night, CBS News’ “60 Minutes” looked into this form of “lawful graft.” The “60 Minutes” story exposed, among others, then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for participating in a lucrative initial public offering from Visa in 2008 that was not available to the general public, just as a troublesome piece of legislation that would have hurt credit card companies began making its way through the House (the bill never made it to the floor). And it showed how during the 2008 financial crisis, Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.) — then-ranking Republican on the House Financial Services Committee — aggressively bought stock options based on apocalyptic briefings he had received the day before from Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson.

The report was based on an explosive new book by Peter Schweizer that will hit stores on Tuesday. It’s called “Throw Them All Out: How Politicians and Their Friends Get Rich off Insider Stock Tips, Land Deals, and Cronyism That Would Send the Rest of Us to Prison.” (Full disclosure: Schweizer is a close friend, a former White House colleague and my business partner in a speechwriting firm, Oval Office Writers.

The “60 Minutes” story only scratches the surface of what Schweizer has uncovered. For example, Bachus was not the only member of Congress trading on nonpublic information during the financial crisis. On Sept. 16, 2008, Schweizer writes, Paulson and Bernanke held a “terrifying” closed-door meeting with congressional leaders. “The next day Congressman Jim Moran, Democrat of Virginia, a member of the Appropriations Committee, dumped his shares in ninety different companies . . . [his] most active trading day of the year.”

Rep. Shelley Capito (R-W.Va.) and her husband “dumped between $100,000 and $250,000 in Citigroup stock the day after the briefing,” Schweizer writes, and “at least ten U.S. senators, including John Kerry, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Dick Durbin, traded stock or mutual funds related to the financial industry the following day.” Durbin, Schweizer says, “attended that September 16 briefing with Paulson and Bernanke. He sold off $73,715 in stock funds the next day. Following the next terrifying closed-door briefing, on September 18, he dumped another $42,000 in stock. By doing so, Durbin joined some colleagues in saving themselves from the sizable losses that less-connected investors would experience.” Some members even made gains on their trades, at a time when ordinary Americans without insider knowledge were seeing their life savings evaporate.

Schweizer also documents numerous examples of how members of Congress of both parties — including Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and former House speaker Dennis Hastert — have used federal earmarks to enhance the value of their own real estate holdings. They have done so, Schweizer shows, by extending a light-rail mass transit line near their property, expanding an airport, cleaning up a nearby shoreline, building roads and bridges, and beautifying land and neighborhoods nearby — in each case “substantially increasing values and the net worth of our elected officials, courtesy of taxpayer money.”

Perhaps the most disturbing revelations come from Schweizer’s investigation into the Obama Energy Department and its infamous “green energy” loan guarantee and grant programs, a program Schweizer calls “the greatest — and most expensive — example of crony capitalism in American history.” The scandal surrounding Solyndra — the now-bankrupt, Obama-connected solar power company that received a federally guaranteed loan of $573 million — is well known. But Solyndra, Schweizer says, is only the tip of the iceberg.

According to his research, at least 10 members of President Obama’s campaign finance committee and more than a dozen of his campaign bundlers were big winners in getting tax dollars from these programs. One chart in the book details how the 10 finance committee members collectively raised $457,834, and were in turn approved for grants or loans of nearly $11.4 billion — quite a return on their investment.

In the loan-guarantee program alone, Schweizer writes, “$16.4 billion of the $20.5 billion in loans granted went to companies either run by or primarily owned by Obama financial backers — individuals who were bundlers, members of Obama’s National Finance Committee, or large donors to the Democratic Party.” That is a staggering 71 percent of the loan money.

Schweizer cites example after example of companies that received grants or loans and documents their financial connections to the Obama campaign and the Democratic Party. And he shows how “the [Energy] department’s loan and grant programs are run by partisans who were responsible for raising money during the Obama campaign from the same people who later came to seek government loans and grants.”

There is much, much more, which means that when Schweizer’s book hits stores Tuesday, heads in Washington are going to explode.



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Figures 240 stays silent on obama and pelosi crimes.    Freaking phoney. 

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Figures 240 stays silent on obama and pelosi crimes.    Freaking phoney. 

"It's boring".  ::)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
"It's boring".  ::)

I gue§s its bo®ing for him for fou® years now.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
I gue§s its bo®ing for him for fou® years now.


What I've come to realize is that 180 doesn't know anything beyond the talking points picks up off TV. He's admitted to watching MSNBC and other shitty cable news channels all day and his posts prove that. He's nothing more than the gay male version of Rachel Maddow.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
i dislike pelosi and believe she should be investigted for that sick investment $ she made last year.  NO way she earns that much all of a sudden and it's not shady.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
i dislike pelosi and believe she should be investigted for that sick investment $ she made last year.  NO way she earns that much all of a sudden and it's not shady.

Day late and a dollar short, douche.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
The "perks" we let Congress have are really unbelievable in every sense of the word

333 - the article you posted lists members of both parties so why don't you include that in the title of your thread

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
The "perks" we let Congress have are really unbelievable in every sense of the word

333 - the article you posted lists members of both parties so why don't you include that in the title of your thread

Why? Even MSNBC's headline today only listed Pelosi. That's the price she pays for talking about "being for the little man" and "draining the swamp".

Rest assured, though, as she made as big a fool of herself as you did when she referenced MediaMatters in defense of her crony bullshit.



Nancy Pelosi entered Congress worth shit and will leave $50+ million richer, all while making $174,000 a year.



Another good question is why are her vineyards non-union?  ???

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Why? Even MSNBC's headline today only listed Pelosi. That's the price she pays for talking about "being for the little man" and "draining the swamp". Rest assured, though, as she made as big a fool of herself as you did when she referenced MediaMatters in defense of her crony bullshit.
Nancy Pelosi entered Congress worth shit and will leave $50+ million richer, all while making $174,000 a year.
Another good question is why are her vineyards non-union?  ???

I assume then that you only have a problem when Dems to this kind of stuff ?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
The "perks" we let Congress have are really unbelievable in every sense of the word

333 - the article you posted lists members of both parties so why don't you include that in the title of your thread


Because pelosi and obama were the "drain the swamp" duo and talked about reforming dc.     Both of these thugs talk a bunch a shit about being better than the rest of us.    

I say fire em all.  

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
I assume then that you only have a problem when Dems to this kind of stuff ?

Nope. But I have a problem with elitist Dems like Piglosi preaching down to the rest of us and demonizing businesses while taking advantage of IPOs that I nor you could ever get into. The Visa IPO Piglosi wormed her way into wasn't open to the public. We have to come in after the opening and buy into a stock that could be 30% higher than the IPO.

If anyone else pulled the shit Nancy Pelosi did they'd be in jail. Raj Rajaratnam is looking at 10+ years for "insider trading" that looks like an amateur next to Pelosi.

Their should be term limits and every member of Congress should have their assets placed in a blind trust when they take office.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Nope. But I have a problem with elitist Dems like Piglosi preaching down to the rest of us and demonizing businesses while taking advantage of IPOs that I nor you could ever get into. The Visa IPO Piglosi wormed her way into wasn't open to the public. We have to come in after the opening and buy into a stock that could be 30% higher than the IPO.

If anyone else pulled the shit Nancy Pelosi did they'd be in jail. Raj Rajaratnam is looking at 10+ years for "insider trading" that looks like an amateur next to Pelosi.

Their should be term limits and every member of Congress should have their assets placed in a blind trust when they take office.

Day late and a dollar short, douche.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
The clip is hilarious. Her jaw practically dropped when she was asked the question only for her to revert to typical snide, condescending self.

Day late and a dollar short, douche.

Yawn. Stop trying to deflect this thread off of Nancy Pelosi. If you want to talk about the others, fuck off to your own thread, c*nt.

You elitist Dems really take the piss for hypocrisy.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
The clip is hilarious. Her jaw practically dropped when she was asked the question only for her to revert to typical snide, condescending self.

Yawn. Stop trying to deflect this thread off of Nancy Pelosi. If you want to talk about the others, fuck off to your own thread, c*nt.

You elitist Dems really take the piss for hypocrisy.

stop whining like a child

you're too stupid to even understand that I'm in no way defending Pelosi

if you don't like it then go somewhere else


Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
stop whining like a child

you're too stupid to even understand that I'm in no way defending Pelosi

if you don't like it then go somewhere else



Coming from the guy who was stupid enough to believe that I'm a 38-year-old tenth grader, I can't help but laugh.

If it's any consolation, I considered you to be pretty stupid before that embarrassment so it's not like I could hold you in any lower regard.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Coming from the guy who was stupid enough to believe that I'm a 38-year-old tenth grader, I can't help but laugh.

If it's any consolation, I considered you to be pretty stupid before that embarrassment so it's not like I could hold you in any lower regard.

I never said you were a 38 year old tenth grader

YOU said you were in the 10th grade when 9-11 happened and also said your current age is 38

that would make you ~ 28 in the tenth grade


Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
I never said you were a 38 year old tenth grader

YOU said you were in the 10th grade when 9-11 happened and also said your current age is 38

that would make you ~ 28 in the tenth grade



No one said you did. I said you were stupid enough to BELIEVE my claim.

So you're pretty stupid AND you suck at reading comprehension.

Carry on, retard.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Drain the swamp.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Drain the swamp.

Only when it applies to the GOP.  ::)


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
No one said you did. I said you were stupid enough to BELIEVE my claim.

So you're pretty stupid AND you suck at reading comprehension.

Carry on, retard.

I didn't believe it

REMEMBER

and you didn't make that claim either

you made the statement of where you were on 911 in a thread about that and then in another thread claimed to be 38

At the time I simply asked you about the inconsistency

and like I said then and now, it makes no difference to me either way but I assume from your posts you were a young kid

 ::)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
How Can The American People Ever Trust Congress Again After Learning Of The Rampant Insider Trading
The American Dream ^ | 11-15-2011




How Can The American People Ever Trust Congress Again After Learning Of The Rampant Insider Trading That Has Been Going On?

November 15,2011



Will the shocking insider trading revelations that have come to light in recent days finally be enough to motivate the American people to start throwing all of the con men and charlatans out of Congress? On Sunday, 60 Minutes opened up a huge can of worms when it did a feature story on insider trading by members of Congress. Up until now, the vast majority of Americans had no idea that insider trading was actually legal for members of Congress. In fact, as will be documented later on in this article, members of Congress have been using secrets that they have learned during the course of their duties to make huge amounts of money in the stock market. If you can believe it, during the financial crisis of 2008 some members of Congress were making huge stock moves that would only pay off if the stock market crashed really hard at a time when they should have been focusing on creating legislation that would help the U.S. financial system survive. It is hard not to feel sick after learning how low some of our "leaders" have stooped to enrich themselves. Now that the American people are learning the truth, how can they ever trust Congress again?

Even before these revelations about insider trading by members of Congress came to light, the approval rating for Congress was sitting at about 11 percent.

There is a widespread feeling in this country that our political system simply does not work any longer.

Nearly all of our "leaders" seem to be wealthy elitists that are rapidly becoming wealthier. Today, the average net worth for a member of Congress is approximately 3.8 million dollars, and the collective net worth of all of the members of Congress increased by 25 percent between 2008 and 2010.

It would be one thing is they were accumulating all of this wealth legitimately. However, it is just not right for members of Congress to use government secrets and inside information that is not available to the general public to make huge profits in the stock market.

If any of the rest of us engage in insider trading, it could get us thrown into jail.

But as a recent CNBC article noted, members of Congress can pretty much get away with it as much as they want to....

When you buy and sell stocks based on secrets you learned at the office, it could be insider trading.

But when a United States Senator does it, it's probably perfectly legal.

That's because the SEC has largely determined that trading stocks based on advance knowledge of action in Congress is not insider trading. But just because it is legal, that does not make it right.

Former Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff made headlines recently when he claimed that "a dozen members of Congress and their aides took part in insider trading".

Well, it turns out that there has been a whole lot more insider trading going on than that.

If you have not seen the recent 60 Minutes report on this issue yet, you really should take a few minutes and watch it....

(Go to the site to view the video)


One of the politicians featured in the 60 Minutes story was Nancy Pelosi.

Pelosi has been doing incredibly well financially in recent years. For example, her net worth soared by 62 percent in 2010. If you can believe it, Nancy Pelosi is now worth 35.2 million dollars.

That is a nice chunk of change.

So has she been getting a little bit of "extra help" along the way?

According to a recent CNN article, one very preferential stock deal involving a credit card company went very well for her. It also turns out that there was credit card legislation that was pending in the House at the time....

Pelosi and her husband participated in an initial public offering of Visa in 2008, according to CBS. They bought 5,000 shares at the initial price of $44; two days later, shares were trading at $64, CBS said.

The network reported the investment came at the same time a piece of legislation that was opposed by credit-card companies was making its way through the House. But what is even worse is what many members of Congress did with secret information that they were told by U.S. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke at the start of the financial crisis of 2008.

On September 16, 2008 Paulson and Bernanke held "closed door meetings" with members of Congress and warned them that the financial system was about to totally collapse.

But instead of racing out to save the financial system, author Peter Schweizer says that many of our representatives in Congress raced out to save their stock portfolios.

In his new book, Schweizer alleges the following....

*Schweizer says that U.S. Senator Dick Durbin sold $74,715 worth of stock on September 17th and $42,000 worth of stock on September 18th.

*Schweizer says that U.S. Representative Jim Moran sold off shares in 90 different corporations on September 17th.

*Schweizer says that U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse sold off at least $250,000 worth of stock between September 18th and September 24th.

*Schweizer says that U.S. Representative Spencer Bachus bet very heavily against the stock market in the days following the September 16th meeting and made tens of thousands of dollars doing so.

*Schweizer says that U.S. Senator John Kerry bought up approximately $350,000 of Bank of America stock and approximately $550,000 of Citigroup stock during October 2008 and November of 2008. It was during this time period that the bailout programs for the big banks were being developed and debated.

Are you feeling sick to your stomach yet?

But it isn't just members of Congress that are using secrets to make money in the stock market. According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, quite a few Congressional staffers have also been making questionable trades....

"At least 72 aides on both sides of the aisle traded shares of companies that their bosses help oversee, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of more than 3,000 disclosure forms covering trading activity by Capitol Hill staffers for 2008 and 2009." But nobody is getting into trouble for any of this.

This is how corrupt our system has become.

And there are scientific studies that show that members of Congress have been doing significantly better in the stock market than the general public has been doing.

For example, one study from 2004 found that members of Congress do even better in the stock market than corporate insiders do....

"A 2004 study of the results of stock trading by United States Senators during the 1990s found that that senators on average beat the market by 12% a year. In sharp contrast, U.S. households on average underperformed the market by 1.4% a year and even corporate insiders on average beat the market by only about 6% a year during that period. A reasonable inference is that some Senators had access to - and were using - material nonpublic information about the companies in whose stock they trade." A recent CNBC article mentioned another recent study that found that investments by members of the U.S. House of Representatives beat the market by about 6 percent a year....

In the 2011 study “Abnormal Returns From the Common Stock Investments of Members of the U.S. House of Representatives,” four university professors found that a portfolio that mimics the purchases of House Members beats the market by 55 basis points per month, or approximately 6 percent annually. That study looked at 16,000 common stock transactions made by approximately 300 House delegates from 1985 to 2001. Clearly all of this is not just some huge coincidence.

So why doesn't Congress just pass a law to make it illegal for members of Congress to make trades based on insider information?

Well, a few members of Congress have actually tried to introduce such legislation, but it has never gone anywhere.

It turns out that members of Congress like things just the way that they are.

Being a member of Congress is one of the best jobs in the country. It is a great way to become famous, get rich and live the high life.

As mentioned earlier, only 11 percent of the American people think that Congress is doing a good job, and yet we keep sending the same people back to Congress time after time.

Since 1964, the reelection rate for members of the U.S. House of Representatives has never fallen below 85 percent.

Yes, our system is a joke, but the joke is on us.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------