Hahaha this issue was already dealt with.
Do the rights of the consumer to chose which room they wish to change in, which is a choice supported by Macy's, over rule or super seed the employees religious beliefs and her right to not allow a transgender person change where they wish?
The answer is a resounding Yes in favor of the transgender individual.
There is no viable legal religious defense for discrimination that goes against Macy's policy.
If this individual were of a different race and was denied using the changing room based on a religious belief that it's not okay for other races to share change rooms would you still defend the employee?
Truth is you are in the wrong and just wish to push you anti-LBGT agenda some more. Sad really.
This has zilch to do with race, number one (nice try, lumping the two).
Number two, this is occuring, even with guys who aren't "transgender". Hence, we have the usual slippery slope that LGBT-sympathizers swear never happens. Guys (who clearly know they're guys and may not even be gay) are in women's dressing rooms.
For some strange reason, this policy isn't advertised very well (i.e. the women don't seem to know up from that guys, as long as they think they're girls, can use their dressing rooms).
BTW, the word is "supercede".
