romney losing by an average of 3.6%.
It's not tied. Yes, on some of them the margin of error is 4% or greater, maybe.
But yeah, taking pride in "we're tied!" is very weak when romney leads in zero of the polls.
Once again, you keep ignoring the blatantly obvious, which has been explained to you more times than I care to count.
An incumbent with these numbers is NOT a good thing, especially with the undecided voter factor. The undecideds almost always break AGAINST the incumbent. Tied at 45 or ahead by three against a "weak" Mitt Romney is not the place that the guy who "got Bin Laden" and got "national healthcare" should be, with just four months to go.
Not to mention (again), Wisconsin, Michigan, Iowa, and Indiana being up for grabs or leaning towards Romney. These were states Obama won convincingly. Now, they're swing states, in addition to the other well-known ones.
ObamaCare survives; yet, we have Dem senators in witness protection programs. The Dems have over TWICE as many seats on the line as the GOP does; and NOW, all the GOP needs is a net gain of four and a Romney win, to lay ObamaCare to rest (The Dems have all but conceded that they ain't winning the House back).