« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 6 ft. and over division  (Read 1657 times)

canyon

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 164
6 ft. and over division
« on: August 12, 2012, 08:41:14 PM »
Notice this new 212 class has been a bust, had 4 competitors at first show with this new class in Phoenix. Don't think audience is much interested either  in watching 5'3 200lbs. midgets on stage. Would be more interesting to have a 6 ft and over class, I know I would rather watch even 3rd tier pros like Sean Allen compete then any of these blown up midgets.
Logged

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 48852
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: 6 ft. and over division
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2012, 08:45:06 PM »
::yawn:: yes, we know, the midgets are horrible. By the way, a 6'0" class is a dumb idea. I mean, how much is there a difference in terms of size between a guy 6'0 and 5'10"?

Though, Tito24 would rightly approve of your post!  ;D ;D
Logged
X

99 Bananas

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1320
Re: 6 ft. and over division
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2012, 08:57:23 PM »
So you prefer your thonged men to be tall and heavy
Logged

canyon

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 164
Re: 6 ft. and over division
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2012, 09:02:52 PM »
Quote from: SF1900 on August 12, 2012, 08:45:06 PM
::yawn:: yes, we know, the midgets are horrible. By the way, a 6'0" class is a dumb idea. I mean, how much is there a difference in terms of size between a guy 6'0 and 5'10"?

Though, Tito24 would rightly approve of your post!  ;D ;D
Haven't seen a 5'10 pro competing at 202 or 212 in about 20 years. Big difference between 5'4 an 6'2.
Logged

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 48852
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: 6 ft. and over division
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2012, 10:21:36 PM »
Quote from: canyon on August 12, 2012, 09:02:52 PM
Haven't seen a 5'10 pro competing at 202 or 212 in about 20 years. Big difference between 5'4 an 6'2.

no shit, which is why there is a separate division. Because there is a huge difference between 5'4" and 6'0"

But why make a 6'0"+ category. If you do that, you exclude all the bodybuidlers who are 5'11 and 5'10" As I said, not much difference in terms of size betweeen a 6'0" bodybuilder and one that is 5'11"
Logged
X

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: 6 ft. and over division
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2012, 10:30:25 PM »
f
Logged

MikMaq

  • Guest
Re: 6 ft. and over division
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2012, 10:38:44 PM »
Quote from: SF1900 on August 12, 2012, 10:21:36 PM
no shit, which is why there is a separate division. Because there is a huge difference between 5'4" and 6'0"

But why make a 6'0"+ category. If you do that, you exclude all the bodybuidlers who are 5'11 and 5'10" As I said, not much difference in terms of size betweeen a 6'0" bodybuilder and one that is 5'11"
Than you'd make it near impossible for a shorter person to win without being in the tall category. If it were six foot and over, you'd get a very different physique on stage.

But fuck it this idea is crazy, it wouldn't be believable people over 6 foot don't look athletic, it's a waste of time.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »