Author Topic: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.  (Read 2050 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #25 on: November 01, 2012, 09:04:38 AM »
wow, TA showing some serious truth in this thread.

Nate silver was VERY accurate in 2010... Rasmussen not as much.

TA served the fact.  What are Nate and Ras saying about 2012?

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #26 on: November 01, 2012, 09:12:40 AM »
wow, TA showing some serious truth in this thread.

Nate silver was VERY accurate in 2010... Rasmussen not as much.

TA served the fact.  What are Nate and Ras saying about 2012?
Obama has an 80 percent chance of winning and 20 percent of losing. 

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19263
  • Getbig!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #27 on: November 01, 2012, 09:13:51 AM »
Opinions don`t matter.  Try using the data for once.

I've used the data, multiple times. Perhaps you should get some Lasix and check it out.

Obama is LOSING in early voting. He's getting KILLED with independents and with white working-class voters (especially men). What part of that can't you quite grasp?

That's NATIONWIDE. I've cited at least four states: Florida, Virginia, Colorado, and Ohio.

Here's some more data for you. Gallup has had Romney at 50% or higher for over two weeks. Guess what: Every challenger that has been at 50% or more since mid-October HAS WON.

Now you have even libs, talking about the possibility of having a winner of the EC, losing the popular vote. Good luck with that, considering that's only happened 4 times, NEVER with an incumbent president.

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19263
  • Getbig!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #28 on: November 01, 2012, 09:15:39 AM »
Obama has an 80 percent chance of winning and 20 percent of losing. 

Dream on, Adonis.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #29 on: November 01, 2012, 09:21:02 AM »
Obama is LOSING in early voting. He's getting KILLED with independents and with white working-class voters (especially men). What part of that can't you quite grasp?

That's NATIONWIDE. I've cited at least four states: Florida, Virginia, Colorado, and Ohio.

I thought Obama was still leading in FL early voting, but by nowhere near the same margin as in 2008.

I quoted THAT LINE from YOUR POST.   You even laughed and said "I said it first".

It said obama was winning FL, but by far fewer votes.  You say he's "losing" and say he's losing FL.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40959
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #30 on: November 01, 2012, 09:30:47 AM »
All this chatter about polls means very little in my opinion. The results will be what they will be in 6 days. Odds makers are betting on President Obama winning. There will be a lot of unhappy gamblers if he loses.

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19263
  • Getbig!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #31 on: November 01, 2012, 09:31:27 AM »
I thought Obama was still leading in FL early voting, but by nowhere near the same margin as in 2008.

I quoted THAT LINE from YOUR POST.   You even laughed and said "I said it first".

It said obama was winning FL, but by far fewer votes.  You say he's "losing" and say he's losing FL.

Let me clarify.

I did indeed post the article in Florida, that had Obama up by a mere 41,000 votes but the numbers are down 70% from 2008.

Notice I put in caps "that's NATIONWIDE". I was also referring to a Gallup poll and a Pew poll that has Romney beating Obama in early voting nationwide.


Regarding the latter poll, I just saw this flashed on Fox News.

Obama had a +19 edge in early voting against McCain in 2008. Now, Romney is beating Obama (now, the incumbent president) by 7, according to Pew.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39945
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #32 on: November 01, 2012, 09:52:15 AM »
Pew: Yup, Romney's Leading in Early Voting [Confirms Gallup]
 Townhall ^ | Nov 01, 2012 | Guy Benson

Posted on Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:20:17 AM

 November 1, 2012





Pew: Yup, Romney's Leading in Early Voting

By Guy Benson

11/1/2012

 

 Welcome to November.  Earlier in the week, one of the oldest and most respected polling firms in America -- Gallup -- produced results based on thousands of voter contacts indicating that Mitt Romney is leading in national early voting by roughly six percentage points.  Last night, another venerable polling outfit confirmed Gallup's findings with a survey of its own.  From Pew Research:
 


 The Pew Research Center survey found that the race is even among all likely voters nationwide (47% Obama, 47% Romney). Unlike the last campaign, the race also is close among voters who say they have already voted. In the poll, conducted Oct. 24-28, 19% of likely voters say they have already voted; that is unchanged from the same week in the 2008 campaign (Oct. 23-26, 2008). Currently, Romney holds a seven-point edge among early voters (50% to 43%); because of the small sample, this lead is not statistically significant. At this point four years ago, Obama led John McCain by 19 points (53% to 34%) among early voters. 


 The overall sample was roughly 1700 voters, only about half the size of Gallup's pool, but resulting in nearly the exact same early voting outcome.  In this case, Romney by seven.  Gallup found that Obama led McCain by 15 points in early tallies at this stage in 2008; Pew puts the gap at 19 points, so their 2012 numbers represent a 26-point swing to the GOP ticket.  That's...not insignificant.  But what about in the swing states?  The Washington Post reports that Obama has the lead in most (but not all) of the contested battlegrounds, but that Romney is hugely outpacing McCain's 2008 numbers.  In brief, Republicans are narrowing the gap in Nevada, North Carolina and Iowa (where one new state poll gives Romney a slight overall lead, while another shows Obama winning).  Romney is doing quite well in Colorado, where the GOP is actually leading Democrats, very much unlike last cycle.  In Florida, Democrats have a small edge in the early totals, but nowhere near their 2008 levels:
 


 Democrats hold a narrow lead (43 percent to 41 percent) and are not on pace to match their 46-37 advantage from 2008. We are through four days of the eight-day period for in-person early voting, and while Democrats gained big on the first two days (Saturday and Sunday), they were unable to keep that pace on Monday and Tuesday. Democrat netted 73,000 vote from the first two days, but gained 28,000 votes on Monday and just 16,000 votes on Tuesday. Meanwhile, Republicans keep building their absentee lead, which stands at 70,000 votes. While Democrats won the combined early vote (absentee plus in-person) by more than 360,000 votes in 2008, they currently lead by about 49,000. That edge will grow over the next four days as Democrats build their in-person early voting lead (many more people vote in-person than absentee), but it’s unlikely to approach anywhere near 360,000. 


 The Romney campaign said today that they expect to win Florida's election day voters by double digits.  In Virginia, counties that Obama won last time have seen a dramatic drop-off in absentee balloting; absentee "turnout" in Republican areas has slowed a bit, but not as much as Democrat territory.  Finally, there's Ohio.  Public polling shows Obama with a large lead, but there's no way to verify that.  Republicans say the raw numbers don't bear out that big Obama advantage:
 

 “The Gallup numbers nationally confirm what we think is happening here in Ohio,” says one Romney official. “It’s two things. One, their margin of victory in early voting is greatly diminished — drastically diminished. And two, they are having a very difficult time generating enthusiasm among young people.” Asked for evidence to support those claims, the official cited a Romney tally showing absentee and early voting is ten percent higher in counties McCain won in 2008 than in counties Obama won. He also pointed to sluggish early voting in the Toledo area, which Obama won in ’08, and particularly energetic early voting in the Cincinnati area, which McCain won. In addition, the official argues that Republicans are “outperforming our share of voter registration in absentee requests and early votes” and that the GOP has “closed the gap on Democrats’ historical absentee and early vote advantage for 20 of the past 21 days.” 


 Has that gap closed enough to stem Obama's pre-election day tide and tee up a Romney win at the ballot box day-of?  The answer to that question, ladies and gents, may very well determine the 2012 presidential election.  One alternate route to 270 for Romney involves Wisconsin, which was tied as of late last week.  Then came Marquette's latest poll, which shows Obama ahead by eight -- a seven-point jump in approximately one week.  Wisconsin insiders smell a sampling rat.  Even so, just when you think Wisconsin may be slipping away (I've heard the opposite from folks on the ground there, by the way), an elected Democrat says this:
 


 Hancock even broke news on that Wisconsin trip, telling voters if the election were to be held right now the president would lose Wisconsin and its coveted 10 electoral votes. ... “We have not turned out the vote early,” Hancock told the newspaper. “The suburbs and rural parts of Wisconsin – the Republican base – are voting. President Obama’s base has yet to go vote. We’ve got to get our people to go vote.” 

Guy Benson is Townhall.com's Political Editor. Follow him on Twitter @guypbenson.

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6371
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #33 on: November 01, 2012, 01:45:17 PM »
Let me clarify.

I did indeed post the article in Florida, that had Obama up by a mere 41,000 votes but the numbers are down 70% from 2008.

Notice I put in caps "that's NATIONWIDE". I was also referring to a Gallup poll and a Pew poll that has Romney beating Obama in early voting nationwide.


Regarding the latter poll, I just saw this flashed on Fox News.

Obama had a +19 edge in early voting against McCain in 2008. Now, Romney is beating Obama (now, the incumbent president) by 7, according to Pew.


Regarding early voting...

-Is Obama is losing in early voting because less people are voting for him?
-Are those that are early voting for Romney "new" voters for him or are they simply people who would vote anyways but simply chose to vote early?



Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #34 on: November 01, 2012, 01:50:11 PM »
hahahahha YOU TITLE A THREAD  "SIFT THROUGH THE BS!!!!!!!!?????????????!!!!!!!!???????hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #35 on: November 01, 2012, 01:52:17 PM »

Here is the other probolem for you TA - Romney will get more crossover and Inde votes than Obama will, so you and theleftist bubble are making a false assumption that all democrat votes are for Obama.

LANDSLIDE COMING?

blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #36 on: November 01, 2012, 01:53:19 PM »
the true adonis owned this thread by a landslide  :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #37 on: November 01, 2012, 01:55:02 PM »
hahahahha YOU TITLE A THREAD  "SIFT THROUGH THE BS!!!!!!!!?!!!!!!!!?hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahaha

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39945
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #38 on: November 03, 2012, 07:05:57 AM »
As for early voting in the state, the Colorado Secretary of State's office reports that over 1.3 million ballots have already been cast here. Of those, 457,337 are Democrats, 493, 457 are Republicans and 341,920 are from voters registered as "unaffiliated." The number of ballots cast so far is already more than half, 53.9 percent, of the total votes cast in 2008.


________________________ _____________

Colorado going to Romney. 


Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #40 on: November 03, 2012, 07:12:11 AM »
Romney is a cheat and a dirtbag

http://www.opednews.com/articles/UAW-Files-Charges-Against-by-Greg-Palast-121102-673.html

nothing wrong with profiting and hiding your dough off of internal info right?

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19263
  • Getbig!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #41 on: November 03, 2012, 12:42:00 PM »
As for early voting in the state, the Colorado Secretary of State's office reports that over 1.3 million ballots have already been cast here. Of those, 457,337 are Democrats, 493, 457 are Republicans and 341,920 are from voters registered as "unaffiliated." The number of ballots cast so far is already more than half, 53.9 percent, of the total votes cast in 2008.


________________________ _____________

Colorado going to Romney.  



Karl Rove cited similar numbers, regarding Ohio. He stated on his trusty whiteboard that, as of Thursday night, there were just over a million early votes. Of those, Obama had about 547,000; Romney had 470,000.

To put that in perspective that's 165,000 FEWER voters than Obama had against McCain; whereas Romney had over 98,000 more than McCain did four years ago.

The difference between Obama's losses and Romney's gains over McCain is 265,000 votes; recall that Obama won Ohio by 262,000 votes.

The actual tallies, thus far, seem to reflect what Pew and Gallup have been saying for a week (despite the left's dismissal of their findings): Obama's early vote edge is all but GONE. The narrative is that, if Romney stays close or beats Obama in early votes, he can close the deal on election day, particularly in Ohio.

If Romney gets Colorado and Ohio (and the 30,000+ rally last night is good news for him), that, coupled with Romney sweeping the southeast, gets him the White House at 275 EC votes.




blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #42 on: November 03, 2012, 12:50:14 PM »
here comes the ifs  :D :D :D :D :D :D :D mchannity votes for if

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19263
  • Getbig!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #43 on: November 03, 2012, 12:54:31 PM »
here comes the ifs  :D :D :D :D :D :D :D mchannity votes for if

Apparently you don't read very well. Obama's early voting numbers, his supposed strength and the Dems' key weapon, are DOWN, WAAAAAY DOWN., just as Gallup and Pew stated.

He's losing in Colorado and barely ahead of Romney in Ohio.

The GOP will have the edge in turnout on election day. As long as Romney stays within striking range of Obama in early voting, he catches and surpasses him on election day and wins it.

blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #44 on: November 03, 2012, 12:59:46 PM »
Apparently you don't read very well. Obama's early voting numbers, his supposed strength and the Dems' key weapon, are DOWN, WAAAAAY DOWN., just as Gallup and Pew stated.

He's losing in Colorado and barely ahead of Romney in Ohio.

The GOP will have the edge in turnout on election day. As long as Romney stays within striking range of Obama in early voting, he catches and surpasses him on election day and wins it.


if you thinking this makes you feel better i'm all for it  :D :D :D :D :D :D

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19263
  • Getbig!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #45 on: November 03, 2012, 01:07:26 PM »

if you thinking this makes you feel better i'm all for it  :D :D :D :D :D :D

I'm not thinking it, Einstein; those were the numbers.

Ohio, for example: About this time in 2008, Obama has 720,000 early votes; now, he only has 547,000

McCain had 372,000; Romney has 470,000.

And the same trends are happening in other swing states (Florida, Colorado, Virginia, etc), as early votes are tallied. The theme is the same: Obama's numbers WAY DOWN.


Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #46 on: November 03, 2012, 01:15:20 PM »
I'm not thinking it, Einstein; those were the numbers.

Ohio, for example: About this time in 2008, Obama has 720,000 early votes; now, he only has 547,000

McCain had 372,000; Romney has 470,000.

And the same trends are happening in other swing states (Florida, Colorado, Virginia, etc), as early votes are tallied. The theme is the same: Obama's numbers WAY DOWN.



Obama is going to win, However, they are already trying to cheat, fucking last second software patches

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19263
  • Getbig!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #47 on: November 03, 2012, 01:18:25 PM »
Obama is going to win, However, they are already trying to cheat, fucking last second software patches

I wouldn't bet on it, especially with the latest batch of early voting numbers out. It's the same deal: Obama WAY DOWN IN EARLY VOTING!

Colorado

Votes: 1.5 million

Democrats: 35 percent

Republicans: 37 percent

___

Florida

Votes: 3.5 million

Democrats: 43 percent

Republicans: 40 percent

___

Iowa

Votes: 584,000

Democrats: 43 percent

Republicans: 32 percent

___

Nevada

Votes: 627,000

Democrats: 44 percent

Republicans: 37 percent

___

North Carolina

Votes: 2.3 million

Democrats: 48 percent

Republicans: 32 percent

___

Ohio

Votes: 1.3 million

Democrats: 29 percent

Republicans: 23 percent



http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83176.html


garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #48 on: November 03, 2012, 06:37:47 PM »
I wouldn't bet on it, especially with the latest batch of early voting numbers out. It's the same deal: Obama WAY DOWN IN EARLY VOTING!

Colorado

Votes: 1.5 million

Democrats: 35 percent

Republicans: 37 percent

___

Florida

Votes: 3.5 million

Democrats: 43 percent

Republicans: 40 percent

___

Iowa

Votes: 584,000

Democrats: 43 percent

Republicans: 32 percent

___

Nevada

Votes: 627,000

Democrats: 44 percent

Republicans: 37 percent

___

North Carolina

Votes: 2.3 million

Democrats: 48 percent

Republicans: 32 percent

___

Ohio

Votes: 1.3 million

Democrats: 29 percent

Republicans: 23 percent



http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83176.html


Did you read what you just posted?

G

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19263
  • Getbig!
Re: Real voting data vs. Polls. - Let's sift through the bs.
« Reply #49 on: November 03, 2012, 06:47:40 PM »
Did you read what you just posted?



Yes I did. Those numbers are WAY DOWN from 2008.

Did you read what I posted earlier?

The issue isn't just whether Obama is ahead of Romney in early voting. It's HOW FAR AHEAD Obama is (in the case of Colorado; he's actually behind).

As long as Romney's close, he can overtake Obama on election day and BEAT him. And, given the electorate shift in the last four years, I like his chances.