Author Topic: natty  (Read 6043 times)

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31563
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: natty
« Reply #50 on: May 02, 2013, 04:59:33 AM »
THATS WHY COMPETITIVE BBING NATURAL OR MORESO DRUGGED BBING IS JUDGED BY THERE CONTEST LOOK ONLY,,,OLDER GENERATIONS 50/60/70/80 KEPT CLOSE DEPENDING ON WHAT THEY TOOK CLOSER TO THERE 'LOOK'AS SIZE BECAME MORE APPARENT HOLDING THE SIZE/CONDITION TOOK MORE DRUGS TO MAINTAIN. IF UR KNOWN LOCALLY OR PROFESSIONALLY AS A BBER U HAVE TO INJECT JUST TO GO GROCERY SHOPPING SO PEOPLE DON'T VIEW U SMALLER...YOUR BODY IS AN EXTENSION TO YOUR PERSONA..

TommyBoy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1203
  • What's the vector, Victor?
Re: natty
« Reply #51 on: May 02, 2013, 05:33:54 AM »
all the guys with ics here ARE NOT CLEAN

some may use very little but the guys here don't have the genetics

NOT CLEAN not ultra abuse BUT DEFINETELY NOT 100 CLEAN


You are a doll.

I'm a lifetime natty. By choice and a lot by force. I've been on a pretty damn good career path since I was 18, but that choice of career doesn't tolerate any illegal use of substances whatsoever. It's not worth the risk.

BigCyp

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10897
Re: natty
« Reply #52 on: May 02, 2013, 06:09:32 AM »
You are a doll.

I'm a lifetime natty. By choice and a lot by force. I've been on a pretty damn good career path since I was 18, but that choice of career doesn't tolerate any illegal use of substances whatsoever. It's not worth the risk.

You're a professional cyclist?

IronMeister

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3280
  • Übermacht
Re: natty
« Reply #53 on: May 02, 2013, 07:25:50 AM »

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: natty
« Reply #54 on: May 02, 2013, 07:28:14 AM »

LOL Goodrum in the back checking things out.

TommyBoy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1203
  • What's the vector, Victor?
Re: natty
« Reply #55 on: May 02, 2013, 10:58:35 AM »
You're a professional cyclist?

HAH! Good one.  ;)

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26566
  • Dog sees 🐿️
Re: natty
« Reply #56 on: May 02, 2013, 11:15:33 AM »
YOUR BODY IS AN EXTENSION TO YOUR PERSONA..


can you expand on this brother?

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31563
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: natty
« Reply #57 on: May 02, 2013, 11:35:24 AM »
can you expand on this brother?
on a pro level these guys are for at least a portion of the yr are in unreal shape to compete,expos,pics,its the standard there held too and having to maintain it maybe not in true contest form,but big and somewhat lean is not easy to do without 'help'24/7...

old-school-lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2685
Re: natty
« Reply #58 on: May 02, 2013, 08:35:28 PM »
all the guys with ics here ARE NOT CLEAN

some may use very little but the guys here don't have the genetics

NOT CLEAN not ultra abuse BUT DEFINETELY NOT 100 CLEAN


totally agree
NOT 100% LIFETIME natural

Jovo

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 801
  • Getbig !
Re: natty
« Reply #59 on: May 03, 2013, 03:36:13 AM »
I wouldnt think any one can look like that naturally in all honesty. He was way to full at a low bf%.

I guess he could be genetically gifted ecto ofcourse. Ultra lean but can gain alot of muscle.

Kwon_2

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33809
  • Pretty sure he isn't in Ibiza getting the girls
Re: natty
« Reply #60 on: May 03, 2013, 03:36:53 AM »

TommyBoy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1203
  • What's the vector, Victor?
Re: natty
« Reply #61 on: May 03, 2013, 05:59:46 AM »
totally agree
NOT 100% LIFETIME natural

I can only speak for myself, but if you guys are implying my look wasn't naturally achievable you obviously haven't been obsessed or don't have genetics to support leans. When you get someone that believes that 1970s Arnold was natural, and only bodybuilders in the 90s and up were on roids, mixed with someone who is OCD and tries to be a perfectionist, you get a natural lifter with a decent physique that lazy people would pay extra for the hormones to half ass their workouts/diet too.

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31563
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: natty
« Reply #62 on: May 03, 2013, 06:54:06 AM »
I can only speak for myself, but if you guys are implying my look wasn't naturally achievable you obviously haven't been obsessed or don't have genetics to support leans. When you get someone that believes that 1970s Arnold was natural, and only bodybuilders in the 90s and up were on roids, mixed with someone who is OCD and tries to be a perfectionist, you get a natural lifter with a decent physique that lazy people would pay extra for the hormones to half ass their workouts/diet too.
BY NOW EVERYONE KNOW'S LATE 50'S EARLY 60'S AND UP DRUGS WERE INVOLVED ,,THERE ARE SOME OLD PICS FROM THAT ERA THAT SHOW CLEAN TO A USING BBER ,,EVEN THO THE DIETS AND CONDITION WASN'T EXTREME,THEY HAD GREAT ABS AND FULL LOOKING AND HARD ENOUGH MUSCLE MASS TO SHOW FOR IT.LEGS WEREN'T THE EXTREME NORM IT BECAME LATER ON LATE 70'S TO 80'S WHEN HAVING LEGS WERE JUST AS IMPORTANT.

TommyBoy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1203
  • What's the vector, Victor?
Re: natty
« Reply #63 on: May 03, 2013, 07:01:22 AM »
Well, yeah. I'm just illustrating I was a naive teenager, so are a LOT of teenagers still, and the general public. Most people still think Arnold didn't take roids, even when he straight up admits to it.