Yes, it couldn't have possibly been the guy who that morning took off his wedding ring and left it at home, traveled to work with a collegue who when asked why he had a long thin 3-4 foot paper bag in his hand he said they were curtain rods.Couldnt have been the same man who was sighted by multiple witnesses leaning out of the book depository window with a rifle aimed at the president.Nor was the same mans handprint on said rifle plus 3 spent cartridges anything to do with the presidents death.The fact an overwhelming amount of the witnesses only heard 3 shots is just a coincidence.The same man running from the scene after the presidents death and seen by multiple witnesses murdering a police officer who tried to stop him is purely chance.Also trying to shoot the officer who apprehended him in a movie theatre isn't conclusive evidence.
1.The bag was too small to hold the Carcano even broken down.
2. Oswald had no graphite on his hands or cheek that showed he fired a gun and/or pistol that day.
3. Shells were found by officer Tippet's body even though Oswald had a .38 revolver. He would've had to empty the shells from this wheel gun in order for there to be shells on the ground. Why do that and leave evidence that can be traced back to your gun?
4. Twice the Dallas police dusted the gun for prints. They found none. The first time the FBI dusted for prints, well, they found none. Later, they decided to test it again and found a very smudged palm print on the butt of the rifle.
5. Whenever anyone attempts to recreate the shooting, I notice they never have a tree (Texas live Oak) in their way like Oswald did. Going by the timing of the Zapruder film, he would've been completely blocked off visually for the first two shots.
You don't know what you're talking about.
