Author Topic: Were these guys natural?  (Read 3786 times)

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
Were these guys natural?
« on: November 04, 2013, 05:55:56 AM »
Since current day naturals like Simeon Panda and friends are bigger because of improved Weider principles, nutrient timing, whey protein and horny goat weed, maybe these guys who are smaller were natty?




SilverSpoon

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1820
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2013, 11:44:48 AM »
You can see fairly obvious photoshopping in the 2nd picture as well.

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2013, 11:48:29 AM »
who are these criminals?

Rudee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2013, 11:54:50 AM »
Easily achievable naturally with a little bee pollen, a sweet potato, and a half dozen raw squirrel eggs a day. 

_aj_

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17641
  • The Return of the OG
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2013, 11:57:42 AM »
Panda's chest to waist ratio is like 2:1. Ridiculous.

Easily attainable with Weider Principles and creatine.

Rambone

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23430
  • Fuck off tiny tit
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2013, 12:10:02 PM »
Panda's chest to waist ratio is like 2:1. Ridiculous.

Easily attainable with Weider Principles and creatine.

4 words......Weider Pre-Exhaustion Training Principles

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2013, 12:31:55 PM »
Natural Pandas in their native habitat are stronger than those reared in an artificial environment.

TrueGrit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15192
  • Big dude...all the way big dude.
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2013, 12:34:04 PM »
Whitey needs dbol just to have the natural test levels of those fine Hebrew boys..
O

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2013, 12:36:13 PM »
   NOT

flex933

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 357
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2013, 04:12:40 PM »
Panda not even close to Arnold or Lou and not as good conditioned as Zane... Bad pic

Kwon_2

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33809
  • Pretty sure he isn't in Ibiza getting the girls
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2013, 07:45:02 PM »
Since current day naturals like Simeon Panda and friends are bigger because of improved Weider principles, nutrient timing, whey protein and horny goat weed, maybe these guys who are smaller were natty?



Arnold looked huge there! Made Lou look slender (the angle was helping of course) :D

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2013, 07:48:09 PM »
Great shot.   Arnold is huge. Zane looks soft for Zane but still good- but Ferrigno is clearly the tighest and best conditioned in the photo. His face is drawn and gaunt, his abs are deep and his serratus and intercoastals are showing even though he is relaxed. Franco's forearm is just visible on the extreme left.  ;)
a

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2013, 08:09:00 PM »
Great shot.   Arnold is huge. Zane looks soft for Zane but still good- but Ferrigno is clearly the tighest and best conditioned in the photo. His face is drawn and gaunt, his abs are deep and his serratus and intercoastals are showing even though he is relaxed. Franco's forearm is just visible on the extreme left.  ;)
Lou looks killer there.
Arnold destroyed his mind though.

Hurricane Beef !

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4723
  • Beat Coach, Wes & Chaos So Bad . . .
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #13 on: November 04, 2013, 08:12:44 PM »
74 Olympia . . . Lou came in very light, Zane destroyed Franco.

THE BEEF

galeniko

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4535
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #14 on: November 04, 2013, 08:17:16 PM »
you can SEE they are natural!

the picture itself is the proof!

open your eyes.

do you see a needle stuck in them?

do you see them munching on orals?

no?see, natural.

n

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #15 on: November 05, 2013, 04:48:00 PM »
black guy on the right most likely natural.

Obvious Gimmick

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6290
  • I'd hit it
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #16 on: November 06, 2013, 12:17:46 AM »
As natural as 2 shirtless guys taking a few pictures before settling down for some nice toilet wine

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #17 on: November 06, 2013, 12:41:28 AM »
black guy on the right most likely natural.
NOPE, naturals DO NOT get capped delts. Minus the delts he can pass though

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23830
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #18 on: November 06, 2013, 05:45:23 AM »
Looked fantastic.
.

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #19 on: November 06, 2013, 02:47:49 PM »
NOPE, naturals DO NOT get capped delts. Minus the delts he can pass though

creatine and 'ripped freak'

he prolly only weights 185

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83626
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #20 on: November 06, 2013, 02:52:45 PM »
74 Olympia . . . Lou came in very light, Zane destroyed Franco.

THE BEEF

I agree , Zane looked better

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #21 on: November 06, 2013, 04:54:16 PM »
That's not Forest Whitaker on the right.

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29906
  • Expunged
Re: Were these guys natural?
« Reply #22 on: November 06, 2013, 04:58:56 PM »
Why are their forearms touching?