Author Topic: Woman Behind Roe v. Wade: “I’m Dedicating My Life to Overturning It”  (Read 857 times)

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 60015
  • It’s All Bullshit
Great news here!!


As Roe v. Wade and its allowance for unlimited abortions throughout pregnancy turns 40 today, the woman behind the infamous Supreme Court case has pledged her life to overturning it.

Norma McCorvey never wanted an abortion — she was seeking a divorce from her husband — but young, pro-abortion feminist attorney Sarah Weddington used McCorvey’s case as a means of attempting to overturn Texas’ law making most abortions illegal. Weddington took the case all the way to the Supreme Court, which invalidated every pro-life state law in the nation protecting unborn children and the rest is history.

But most Americans don’t know that McCorvey, who was “pro-choice” on abortion at the time, is now a pro-life advocate. She is now dedicated to reversing the Supreme Court case that bears her fictitious name, Jane Roe.

In a video, McCorvey explains her effort to obtain a legal abortion in the 1970s when facing an unplanned pregnancy. However, she has never had an abortion and now realizes that her court case was the biggest mistake of her life and currently fights to stop abortion.

“Back in 1973, I was a very confused twenty-one year old with one child and facing an unplanned pregnancy,” she says in the ad. “At the time I fought to obtain a legal abortion, but truth be told, I have three daughters and never had an abortion.”

“I think it’s safe to say that the entire abortion industry is based on a lie…. I am dedicated to spending the rest of my life undoing the law that bears my name,” McCorvey says.

She concludes the 60 second ad with the words: “You read about me in history books, but now I am dedicated to spreading the truth about preserving the dignity of all human life from natural conception to natural death.”

http://www.lifenews.com/2013/01/22/woman-behind-roe-v-wade-im-dedicating-my-life-to-overturning-it/

snx

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2109
Great news here!!


As Roe v. Wade and its allowance for unlimited abortions throughout pregnancy turns 40 today, the woman behind the infamous Supreme Court case has pledged her life to overturning it.

Norma McCorvey never wanted an abortion — she was seeking a divorce from her husband — but young, pro-abortion feminist attorney Sarah Weddington used McCorvey’s case as a means of attempting to overturn Texas’ law making most abortions illegal. Weddington took the case all the way to the Supreme Court, which invalidated every pro-life state law in the nation protecting unborn children and the rest is history.

But most Americans don’t know that McCorvey, who was “pro-choice” on abortion at the time, is now a pro-life advocate. She is now dedicated to reversing the Supreme Court case that bears her fictitious name, Jane Roe.

In a video, McCorvey explains her effort to obtain a legal abortion in the 1970s when facing an unplanned pregnancy. However, she has never had an abortion and now realizes that her court case was the biggest mistake of her life and currently fights to stop abortion.

“Back in 1973, I was a very confused twenty-one year old with one child and facing an unplanned pregnancy,” she says in the ad. “At the time I fought to obtain a legal abortion, but truth be told, I have three daughters and never had an abortion.”

“I think it’s safe to say that the entire abortion industry is based on a lie…. I am dedicated to spending the rest of my life undoing the law that bears my name,” McCorvey says.

She concludes the 60 second ad with the words: “You read about me in history books, but now I am dedicated to spreading the truth about preserving the dignity of all human life from natural conception to natural death.”

http://www.lifenews.com/2013/01/22/woman-behind-roe-v-wade-im-dedicating-my-life-to-overturning-it/

You think repealing the rights for women to have abortions is good news? If so, please explain why, in the case of a woman being impregnated through aggravate rape, it would be preferable for all involved if the fetus were not aborted.  Please elaborate on your viewpoint as it pertains to how disallowing abortions will positively impact the following people (you can use 1 paragraph for each of the 4 sections, if you like):

1. the man who raped the woman
2. the woman who was raped
3. the woman's spouse (i.e. the man she is married to, who is now married to a woman that another man raped while he was married to her)
4. the woman's family (i.e. her other children with her husband), who will be involved in the fetus's life if it is brought to term

Thanks in advance. Looking forward to a cogent, well-crafted response.

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
No one cares about her anymore.

She will change nothing.

Too bad, so sad for the anti-abortion crew.

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31828
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom


vs.


ProudVirgin69

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7565
  • hardcore redneck electric champion
No one cares about her anymore.

She will change nothing.

Too bad, so sad for the anti-abortion crew.

This.... whatever gives Coach some hope, though

BikiniSlut

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4988
  • I'm dating and love Uncle Junior! Xoxoxo
Obviously the irony has been noted but I believe her attempts at attention are futile.

Is she fighting the greater cause or just happy to be back in the spotlight?

I'd rather not get into the debate of pro choice vs pro life because that saga has gone on for ages. It could go back and forth forever.

I doubt her genuinity.....she wants another 15 minutes in the spotlight.