Author Topic: Scientific news about sqirting  (Read 2743 times)

Julio Ceasar

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4143
Scientific news about sqirting
« on: January 12, 2015, 09:54:05 AM »
Is just urine, theres no golden liquid coming out, pure pee!

Well, now its not that exciting anymore! You can just ask any random girl to piss on u if u like it!

I'm disappointed! All the magic about it is gone!

denarii

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4243
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2015, 10:27:06 AM »
So u r sayin booty is a squirter...

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49697
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2015, 10:30:15 AM »
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/seriouslyscience/2015/01/12/proof-female-ejaculation-just-pee/#.VLVj-HuGMXg

 Up until now, the scientific literature was pretty much as divided as the internet on whether the large amount of fluid emitted from women upon orgasm represents “real” female ejaculate, or whether it is simply urine (there is a remarkably large body of literature on this topic, both scientific and trashy, and everywhere in between). Previous experiments have focused on determining the liquid’s chemical makeup, finding it to be chemically identical to urine, but these studies ignored the physical source of the copious fluid. Here, the researchers take it one step further by performing ultrasounds before and after ejaculation, as well as testing the biochemical properties of the liquid. It turns out that not only is it chemically identical to urine, but the bladder empties during the period of ejaculation coinciding with orgasm. So there you have it: it’s probably just pee after all!

Nature and Origin of “Squirting” in Female Sexuality.

“INTRODUCTION: During sexual stimulation, some women report the discharge of a noticeable amount of fluid from the urethra, a phenomenon also called “squirting.”

To date, both the nature and the origin of squirting remain controversial. In this investigation, we not only analyzed the biochemical nature of the emitted fluid, but also explored the presence of any pelvic liquid collection that could result from sexual arousal and explain a massive fluid emission.

METHODS: Seven women, without gynecologic abnormalities and who reported recurrent and massive fluid emission during sexual stimulation, underwent provoked sexual arousal. Pelvic ultrasound scans were performed after voluntary urination (US1), and during sexual stimulation just before (US2) and after (US3) squirting. Urea, creatinine, uric acid, and prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations were assessed in urinary samples before sexual stimulation (BSU) and after squirting (ASU), and squirting sample itself (S).

RESULTS: In all participants, US1 confirmed thorough bladder emptiness. After a variable time of sexual excitation, US2 (just before squirting) showed noticeable bladder filling, and US3 (just after squirting) demonstrated that the bladder had been emptied again. Biochemical analysis of BSU, S, and ASU showed comparable urea, creatinine, and uric acid concentrations in all participants. Yet, whereas PSA was not detected in BSU in six out of seven participants, this antigen was present in S and ASU in five out of seven participants.

CONCLUSIONS: The present data based on ultrasonographic bladder monitoring and biochemical analyses indicate that squirting is essentially the involuntary emission of urine during sexual activity, although a marginal contribution of prostatic secretions to the emitted fluid often exists.”
X

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2015, 10:33:04 AM »
That's disappointing.

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49697
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2015, 10:33:39 AM »
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/scientists-confirm-there-are-two-different-forms-of-female-squirt/

Well, according to this article, its not just urine. There is another type (two types) that can also be expelled from the urethra, one of them being urine and the other, a milky white liquid.

Last year, the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) ordered over six minutes of material be cut from a pornographic movie because it depicted scenes of "female ejaculation" which, they said, doesn't exist.

Censorship in any form is always controversial, but on this occasion, the BBFC came under fire from a totally unexpected quarter, the activist group Feminists Against Censorship (FAC), who composed a detailed letter to the censor with a mountain of scientific evidence to support the case for female ejaculation.

The BBFC had stated that, as female ejaculation was, in their eyes, just a fiction, the actresses in the film must have been urinating instead. The UK's Obscene Publications Act bans scenes in which one actor urinates on another.

The FAC case was strong enough to cause the BBFC to partially back down. They were forced to concede that female ejaculation was a "controversial and much debated area". It was messy fudge. Which it is. Until recently.

Now, gynecologist Samuel Salama and his colleagues at the Parly II private hospital in Le Chesnay, France, have some evidence supporting the reality of female ejaculation.

Salama and his team have carried out the first ever ultrasound scans on women who express large amounts of liquid at orgasm. The results of their work have been published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine.

New Scientist magazine describes how the research showed that there are two forms of female ejaculation. In the first form, a small amount of milky white fluid is expressed. This fluid is, according to some studies, secreted by the Skene glands which drain into the urethra.

But other women report "squirting" a much larger amount of fluid and Salama's study looked at seven women who reported such ejaculation.

The women gave a urine sample and scans were taken to make sure their bladders were empty. Then, either alone or with a partner, they were asked to bring themselves close to orgasm.

At this point, another pelvic ultrasound was taken. Any "squirted fluid" was collected for measurement before the final pelvic scan.

The second scan revealed the women's bladders had refilled but, in the final scan the bladders had emptied again. The conclusion was that the liquid "squirted" at orgasm came from the bladder.

Analysis of the fluid samples found that, for two participants, there was no chemical difference between the urine and the squirted fluid. But the post-orgasm urine samples of the other five women contained prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) which was not present in their first urine samples. PSA is, says the New Scientist part of the "true" female ejaculate, produced mainly by the Skene glands.

Beverley Whipple, a neurophysiologist from Rutgers University in Newark, New Jersey, told New Scientist that the term female ejaculation should only really refer to the production of the small amount of milky white liquid at orgasm and not the "squirting" investigated in this paper. "This study shows the other two kinds of fluids that can be expelled from the female urethra – urine alone, and urine diluted with substances from the female prostate," she said.

The paper on this research concluded that "The present data based on ultrasonographic bladder monitoring and biochemical analyses indicate that squirting is essentially the involuntary emission of urine during sexual activity, although a marginal contribution of prostatic secretions to the emitted fluid often exists."

This work, then, helps resolve some of the controversy. If the findings are correct and can be replicated, it demonstrates that there two different fluids, from two different sources, involved in female ejaculation.

Where this leaves the BBFC and any other censorship body facing similar decisions is still not clear – proving the contents of ejaculate in a hospital lab is one thing. Doing the same thing on the set of a movie is an entirely different matter. For now the controversy is partially resolved but more work is surely needed
X

devilsmile

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11229
  • Hows life? Please, do tell.
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2015, 10:41:07 AM »
right the second when she has cum hard you tell her that, see the reaction. My girlfriend felt so awkward I think she died a little inside, it was funny as fuck  :D

Viking11

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 2002
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2015, 10:53:32 AM »
I can't believe that lack of scientific curiousity. I for one, offer my assistance of advancing this cause for science. Any test subjects please direct to..

Waller

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3761
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2015, 11:05:21 AM »
7 women is hardly conclusive.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41312
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2015, 11:06:02 AM »
Bullshit. ::) ::) ::)

It's not urine.
7

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31841
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #9 on: January 12, 2015, 12:02:10 PM »
Why is this thread making me hard?

MikMaq

  • Guest
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #10 on: January 12, 2015, 12:31:43 PM »
Why is this thread making me hard?
This, I don't care if its liquid aids it's still hot.

TheShape.

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6261
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #11 on: January 12, 2015, 12:39:50 PM »
Would still enjoy it, fuck it.

Obvious Gimmick

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6290
  • I'd hit it
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #12 on: January 12, 2015, 02:51:37 PM »
But it tastes so different  :-\

polychronopolous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #13 on: January 12, 2015, 02:53:22 PM »
Where is that one gif where the girl squirts clear across the room?

Radical Plato

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12879
  • Rhetoric is the art of ruling the minds of men.
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #14 on: January 12, 2015, 02:56:52 PM »
Really, there are people who believe women ejaculate.  Seriously, if you watch these squirting videos you can actually see the fluid come from the urethra.
V

Julio Ceasar

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4143
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #15 on: January 12, 2015, 03:15:05 PM »
There is no squirting! They just piss on them self...and you!

Its all a myth, like st claus, like god...game is over...let put on the bombbelt and take as many men with me as possible!

I was looking foward to this in life, now just another dream crushed!

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #16 on: January 12, 2015, 03:16:58 PM »
i heard hoes that knew how to squirt would never reveal their secrets to anyone


i guess now we know why, they where just pissing the entire time

Waller

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3761
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #17 on: January 12, 2015, 03:19:05 PM »
Really, there are people who believe women ejaculate.  Seriously, if you watch these squirting videos you can actually see the fluid come from the urethra.

Somebody never made anyone squirt   :D

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29923
  • Expunged
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #18 on: January 12, 2015, 03:21:40 PM »
Great to have this cleared up.

Radical Plato

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12879
  • Rhetoric is the art of ruling the minds of men.
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #19 on: January 12, 2015, 06:44:24 PM »
Somebody never made anyone squirt   :D
Somebody is into golden showers.
V

Waller

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3761
Re: Scientific news about sqirting
« Reply #20 on: January 12, 2015, 07:28:39 PM »
Somebody is into golden showers.

Correctomondo.