Author Topic: "Maggie" Arnolds new film  (Read 3914 times)

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: "Maggie" Arnolds new film
« Reply #25 on: March 25, 2015, 05:55:27 PM »
???


i think arnold fucked a couple of his xwives

muscleman-2013

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4620
  • Team Trump
Re: "Maggie" Arnolds new film
« Reply #26 on: March 25, 2015, 09:01:08 PM »
Can't be worse than some of his other movies. Ever had the misfortune of seeing "Kindergarten Cop?"

Actually, a lot of people (including women) love that film.
Ψ

muscleman-2013

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4620
  • Team Trump
Re: "Maggie" Arnolds new film
« Reply #27 on: March 25, 2015, 09:04:03 PM »
Conan The Destroyer was one of my favorites growing up. I watched it again the other day. Talk about a crap movie with terrible special effects.

CONAN the Destroyer was ALWAYS a bad film.  It was made that way intentionally by the director.  It's the reason Arnie never did a third.  Then he and John Milius (Conan the Barbarian director) got talking years and years later about doing another true to the original and that is what got him interested again.
Ψ

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: "Maggie" Arnolds new film
« Reply #28 on: March 25, 2015, 09:05:25 PM »
CONAN the Destroyer was ALWAYS a bad film.  It was made that way intentionally by the director.  It's the reason Arnie never did a third.  Then he and John Milius (Conan the Barbarian director) got talking years and years later about doing another true to the original and that is what got him interested again.

The 2nd Conan was a little corny.  The first one was epic.

TestDummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1328
  • 5%
Re: "Maggie" Arnolds new film
« Reply #29 on: March 25, 2015, 10:37:34 PM »
The 2nd Conan was a little corny.  The first one was epic.

Most of those old movies are corny now... was watching collateral damage last night, omg.... bad 

Donny

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18261
  • getbig Zen Master
Re: "Maggie" Arnolds new film
« Reply #30 on: March 26, 2015, 07:24:20 AM »
I am sure Arnold knows himself he is no Robert De Niro  but then again i donīt think he cares. I am sure he will make a few Bucks out of it. Not a big Arnold fan but good luck to him.

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12138
  • Getbig!
Re: "Maggie" Arnolds new film
« Reply #31 on: March 26, 2015, 08:10:35 AM »
I'm not a fan of Arnold and have zero interest in this movie genre.


If this is the statement of a bodybuilding enthusiast;  MAGGIE is doomed to flop .



WoooSSSHHHHHHHHHHHH BE YE KE

ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Re: "Maggie" Arnolds new film
« Reply #32 on: March 26, 2015, 08:12:14 AM »

i think arnold fucked a couple of his xwives

to which he ran after them to slurp out any remaining semen to hopefully gain 1/100000000 of his god like powers!
?

Tapeworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29349
  • Hold Fast
Re: "Maggie" Arnolds new film
« Reply #33 on: March 26, 2015, 08:23:43 AM »
I really thought the end scene of Sabotage where he lights the cigar and dies was his on screen goodbye.  



Anyway just saw Maggie so SPOILER ALERT at the end he says "Remember how I said I was going to keep working on your farm?  I lied."

SquatsRule

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3202
  • I am "teh sexy"
Re: "Maggie" Arnolds new film
« Reply #34 on: March 26, 2015, 10:48:17 AM »
CONAN the Destroyer was ALWAYS a bad film.  It was made that way intentionally by the director.  It's the reason Arnie never did a third.  Then he and John Milius (Conan the Barbarian director) got talking years and years later about doing another true to the original and that is what got him interested again.

I know, but I thought it was great when I was a kid, and the blond chick was hot.
S

Teutonic Knight

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10358
Re: "Maggie" Arnolds new film
« Reply #35 on: March 26, 2015, 01:27:38 PM »
Arnolds new Aussie real estate TV commercial 'young lady' is  ;D ;D ;D