This is what Facebook is censoring ..

[Rusty Trombone]

Haha yes, at first I didn't believe it.... but it's true. Wtf

[Coach is Back!]

I work in marketing and advertising. I have posted many times on here about the pros of social media in promoting business, how it is important for small businesses and answered peoples questions about how the world of influencing works and why it's not as ridiculous as older generations tend to think it is. You posting tik toks about Kai Greene and Jason Statham here doesn't promote your business, it is you using the app recreationally, which for some reason, you can't admit.

1. I can't admit to using it recreationally? I was never asked nor do I deny it so I have no idea what you're talking about. Yes, I do promote my online training there and link to my apparel but, no, I don't aggressively market on there but rather link it to my IG.

 I didn't say that you must either love everything about facebook or leave it (which, incidentally, is a line of logic you've used in regards to anyone who criticizes anything about our government- as long as it's a complaint you don't agree with.) What I did say is that you post all of this bullshit and end up being one of the most aggressive promoters of the app that is most egregious when it comes to nearly every con and probably don't even realize the irony. I actually don't remember anyone posting tiktoks on this site before you, yet you'd be the first to say something is evil if you can politicize it and link it to China. All of the major American apps were ridiculously hands off for a decent period of time until they were literally shamed and forced into policing their sites more aggressively, largely because of the way conservatives used them.

Not sure what you mean by that but we're the one's getting kicked off and censored while BLM, Antifa, Taliban, the left and left political pundits still get to post their Marxist propaganda..but I digress

Look at your own posting history. How many times have you posted dodgy "BREAKING NEWS" that you found on facebook that originated from a shitty free wordpress page that only has about 3 weeks worth of articles? When I was more active on the political board, it was practically a daily occurrence. If I went through your posting history, I have no doubt that I'd find at least one bullshit story sourced from a two month old blog posted by you within the last 30 days.

Dude, I haven't posted an article from FB in YEARS from any Wordpress blog or otherwise.

[Al Doggity]

1. I can't admit to using it recreationally? I was never asked nor do I deny it so I have no idea what you're talking about. Yes, I do promote my online training there and link to my apparel but, no, I don't aggressively market on there but rather link it to my IG.

The post is one page back. You spent the entire thing claiming all of your social media accounts are for business and that it's a necessary part of promoting your business when I was clearly referring to YOUR RECENT POSTS HERE. You are not obligated to use CCP-affilliated Tik Tok recreationally, but you choose to do it.

Not sure what you mean by that but we're the one's getting kicked off and censored while BLM, Antifa, Taliban, the left and left political pundits still get to post their Marxist propaganda..but I digress

No, it is an issue for MANY groups, conservatives are just the loudest whiners. Years ago, it was revealed that Instagram disables black accounts at a 50% higher rate than that of white accounts. But I wouldn't be surprised if you could come up with an excuse as to why that's justified and it's actually worse for conservatives.

Instagram Automatically Disables Black Users Accounts 50 Percent More Than The White Ones - Internal Research Report
https://www.digitalinformationworld.com/2020/07/instagram-automatically-disables-black-users-accounts-50-percent-more-than-the-white-ones-facebook-internal-research.html

Dude, I haven't posted an article from FB in YEARS from any Wordpress blog or otherwise.

You realize this site has a search function with a date filter? You just posted a link from facebook two weeks ago.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=673102.msg9651961#msg9651961

[Coach is Back!]

The post is one page back. You spent the entire thing claiming all of your social media accounts are for business and that it's a necessary part of promoting your business when I was clearly referring to YOUR RECENT POSTS HERE. You are not obligated to use CCP-affilliated Tik Tok recreationally, but you choose to do it.

No, it is an issue for MANY groups, conservatives are just the loudest whiners. Years ago, it was revealed that Instagram disables black accounts at a 50% higher rate than that of white accounts. But I wouldn't be surprised if you could come up with an excuse as to why that's justified and it's actually worse for conservatives.

Instagram Automatically Disables Black Users Accounts 50 Percent More Than The White Ones - Internal Research Report
https://www.digitalinformationworld.com/2020/07/instagram-automatically-disables-black-users-accounts-50-percent-more-than-the-white-ones-facebook-internal-research.html
You realize this site has a search function with a date filter? You just posted a link from facebook two weeks ago.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=673102.msg9651961#msg9651961

Yep, you got me on that but at the same time it is an article that I could have pulled from Western Journals site

[Mayday]

I've said it before, but worth saying again, drop Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. It's not worth being spied on. Zuckerberg and his company aren't worth giving away your privacy.

But when China did that everbody cried how evil China was and human rights blah blah blah.....

[obsidian]

I've said it before, but worth saying again, drop Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. It's not worth being spied on. Zuckerberg and his company aren't worth giving away your privacy.

They have access to your pictures (your own, family and friends), records detailing your age, education, places of work and immediate family/friends network. The crazy part is that members of Facebook (the general public that signs up) do all the heavy lifting for the company by doing the actual categorizing of information for them. You sign up under the guise of having a great networking tool, but ultimately you're giving away your right to privacy. The shit you've posted up belongs to Facebook.

In WhatsApp, they have collected detailed records of every "private" conversation you've ever had. Ever cheated on your partner? Facebook has detailed records of every conversation, nude picture and sexual video you've ever sent. Ever spoken about illegal matters through WhatsApp? Facebook has records of that. Ever sent a family member details for your bank account, credit card or checking card through WhatsApp? Facebook has records of that. Ever spoken to family about how you despise certain government groups? Facebook has records of that.

Ever purchased illegal drugs through Instagram (weed and the such)? Facebook has records of that. Do you like to follow your favorite male/female escorts on Instagram to check out almost-nude pictures? Facebook has records of that.

Everyone who uses Facebook's products is voluntarily surrendering their right to privacy. If an entity ever needed a perfect backdoor entry to everyone's private affairs, Facebook is the perfect answer to that. All they have to do is collect and surrender that information to whatever entity requests it in exchange for money or some other benefit.

This whistleblower bullshit was likely a distraction. I highly doubt that some random employee just decided to lift the covers off of Facebook's dastardly plans and immediately ended up on 60-minutes (of all shows) with an immediate hearing in congress. What's worse, from some of the soundbites I gathered via congressmen interviews, it almost seems like they gave Facebook an an odd "ultimatum". Either work with congress or have congress stand up against you. Not quite sure what "working with congress" entails.

Zuckerberg can go fuck himself.

On an unrelated note, has anyone else found these two to have an eerily similar appearance?



"1"

Wow, the resemblance is uncanny!

[Al Doggity]

Yep, you got me on that but at the same time it is an article that I could have pulled from Western Journals site

  You can get almost any article on facebook from the original site, that was the point. You regularly pull poorly sourced inaccurate articles from facebook and spread them here. Which reminds me that your current preferred source of propoganda is the epoch times, a site that is owned by a literal chinese cult.