Yes exactly. Why should whites take credit for slavery when a very small percentage took part in it? It's not like whites had the market cornered. It is the dumbest thing to blame whites for slavery. You might just as well blame Africans because a few blacks sold other blacks to a few jews and whites.
A much, much larger percentage of whites helped create modern society with its technology and science than whites who were slave owners. So yes, whites should take credit for all the good stuff. A few dead assholes (white and black and jews) can take credit for slavery.
And again, you can almost count on your finger the number of people that were responsible for the deaths of millions of people - you have to look at the elite and politicians. The local henchman chopping off heads is not one of them.
So not sure why you want to lay the blame for genocides on ALL whites?? That is just fucking moronic and hateful. That's like saying all jews are evil because some jews were responsible for the mass starvation of Ukrainians during the Holomodor.
Step back, take a breath, and be thankful for what white people (and asians and jews) have given you.
you're talking sht as usual i'm afraid. according to consensus figs as late as 1860 nearly 1/3 of all US white southern families were slave owners(not exactly a very small %). transatlantic slavery was the largest slave trading operation in the history of mankind.
and where did i lay blame for genocides on ALL whites? i said that european whites were responsible for the worst genocide in history. which is true.
look i am not knocking white people, my mum is one and i live with another one. but lets not try to pretend that white european values (as is what was being discussed) are morally superior to that of any other race. because in order to do so you have to re write history in the ridiculous way are you are attempting to here.
