Author Topic: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:  (Read 4968 times)

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« on: March 23, 2006, 12:46:31 AM »
http://s37.yousendit.com/d.aspx?
id=0HKNKYIRL2C5T2KQ3J6Q93YKWI


damn he could have destroyed Kurts arm!
Scouser on Tour

OKMike

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 538
  • Getbig!
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2006, 01:26:55 AM »
The link is not working.

slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2006, 05:55:51 AM »
try using divx .... although the video seeems to cutoff after like 15s

torquemada

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1260
  • Billycarp ruled...
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2006, 06:21:57 AM »
Youtube is no longer showing any wwe material after Vince's army of lawyers gave them a call :(.  If you didn't see it, It's Angle calling out Puder.  Kurt does get the takedown,but Puder locks on a Kimura.  If the refs hadn't acted quick (tapping 3; Puder was on the bottom), Kurt would've had to tap...SUPPOSEDLY, Kurt's backstage stroke is one of the reasons that Puder was buried so quick after he won the Tough Enough Challenge.

an123

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3337
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2006, 02:39:36 PM »
Pruder is an idiot.  He threw away a lot of money in the WWE to go after Kurt's arm like that.  He has to remember, wrestling isn't real.

Now he'll be making 1k a fight in smaller shows, since he isn't all that talented a fighter.

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2006, 12:38:20 AM »
yeah he was blamed for Kurt having a stroke backstage. His contract was for 4 years @ $250,000 per year but there was a clause that the WWE could terminate it in the 1st year. They offered him a stint in OVW for $750 a week and he declined on the spot
Scouser on Tour

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2006, 12:42:14 AM »
check it out here

http://www.bullshido.net/forums/printthread.php?threadid=18352/

i put in a search and the first thing i got was his myspace profile lol. One of his friends (he has 365 pages of them!) is Mike Swick
Scouser on Tour

OKMike

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 538
  • Getbig!
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2006, 02:00:23 AM »
How does putting someone in a kimura (shoulder lock) that isn't fully locked in and executed cause a stroke?   ???

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2006, 02:04:32 AM »
probably due to the stress angle suffered knowing he almost tapped out for real ;D its an ego thing
Scouser on Tour

slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2006, 06:08:40 AM »
Quote
The whole thing was prearranged. Puder wasn't trying to sub Angle. He was trying to make it look like he was.

It is obvious to me, as a prowrestling fan my entire life, that Angle and Puder were told to wrestle for a few seconds, neither gaining the upper hand, and then go to the ground with Puder on bottom. Puder was supposed to go for the kimura and Angle was supposed to let him have it. Puder would almost tap out Angle, but lose due to him making the rookie mistake of going for a sub while on his back in a wrestling match. If anything, Puder fucked up by not making sure his shoulders were down.

Even the promotion of Puder as a UFC fighter is a work, as they call it in the business. His MMA record is 4-0, but he's never fought in the UFC.


i must agree with this ...

torquemada

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1260
  • Billycarp ruled...
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2006, 06:53:14 AM »


i must agree with this ...

Really?  It seemed too subtle for WWE; they never hyped it that way at all and really never acknowledged it otherwise.  Truthfully, most of the WWE's audience wouldn't catch that unless you spelled it out for them.

slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2006, 07:01:22 AM »
it looked pretty fake to me




an123

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3337
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #12 on: March 25, 2006, 08:36:22 AM »
He fought on the Gracie / Shamrock card.  Has a 2-0 record now.  But after reviewing the evidence it does look fake.  Oh well, it would have been more interesting if he did something stupid and ruined his chance in the wwe... Kid was probably too small/no mic skill.

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: Daniel Puder - Kurt Angle VID:
« Reply #13 on: March 26, 2006, 05:45:03 AM »
he definitely isnt too small
Scouser on Tour