Trump to NY Times: I don’t want to energize the alt right and I disavow them

[polychronopolous]

The video is about how states (under republican leadership) are regulating and legislating abortion clinics out of business under the guise of safety. Correctly predicting who would win the election doesn't make your viewpoint more valid.

Yes it does.

The guy speaking in the video is a complete ass clown and a youtube punch line.

You want to act like a silly like jerk off and be dead ass wrong on your political predictions...prepare to face the consequences.

If you want to take refuge in snake oil salesman like this who simply prey upon confused young folks like yourself, go ahead...it's not going to change the fact that the Dems are going to get their asses handed to them in '18.

I tried to talk to you like a civilized human being but evidently that isn't enough for you.... phony, shiny objects are more along your line of interest.

I need to be more steadfast in not addressing leftist morons on this sub-forum. I really had a good streak going before overextending myself.

[Al Doggity]

Wow. That post of all posts was the one that caused you to snap?   

Haha, it's funny... when you replied earlier this evening, I was wondering how long you were gonna be able to pretend you didn't want to respond like a psycho. I was thinking weeks, like possibly until the inauguration, since I only post a few times a day, if that. I didn't think it would be a few hours. Once again, I tried to keep it cool.    I guess I have a new member in my fan club. You and Elizabeth can dm each other and workshop some new Kai Green fan fic.

[tonymctones]

BTW, no need to save me a seat on the Trump train. Even if Trump turns out to be an effective president, he will still be doing a lot of shit I don't want. I don't want to see the supreme court move to the right, I don't think trickle down is a good economic strategy, I think he knows less about foreign affairs than I do, I think he probably doesn't even think the criminal justice system needs to be reformed which is even worse than pretending it's a priority yet completely ignoring it (from my viewpoint) and I could go on and on. But realistically, I suspect he might not be that effective.This is coming from someone who has grown increasingly impressed by how Trump's campaign was run reading about it in the aftermath.

This is understandable, you have different priorities than others. Hopefully you understand the extent to how many people may have different priorities to you though after this election.

Perhaps you will stop conflating illegal immigration with immigration, stop thinking those that are in favor of extra scrutiny of people from certain regions are xenophobic or racists and that people who are against transgendered people using opposite sex bathrooms are homophobic.

The reality is that the big bad boogie man you're painting of his supporters is simply not true, its a small part of people who supported him. The majority were good, hard working and honest people who just have different priorities than you do.

[Al Doggity]

.The reality is that the big bad boogie man you're painting of his supporters is simply not true, its a small part of people who supported him. The majority were good, hard working and honest people who just have different priorities than you do.

Where did I do this? Where did I attempt to paint his supporters as big, bad boogie men? Where did I do anything you listed in that post? 

[Al Doggity]

The answer is: NOWHERE! I didn't post anything that falls under what you described. The post you quoted from me doesn't say anything about that stuff.

More importantly, if I had posted that stuff, what logic are you using that makes you think that because a slightly larger percentage of people voted a certain way, my values and opinions should change? If Hillary had won, would you suddenly  be for transgendered bathrooms and consider Donald Trump supporters racist?

[tonymctones]

Where did I do this? Where did I attempt to paint his supporters as big, bad boogie men? Where did I do anything you listed in that post? 

How many threads have you posted about the "alt right"? LOL you know and I know that the "alt right" is a very small fraction of people who supported trump. The reason you keep bringing them up is b/c you want to paint his supporters as racist.

[Thin Lizzy]

How many threads have you posted about the "alt right"? LOL you know and I know that the "alt right" is a very small fraction of people who supported trump. The reason you keep bringing them up is b/c you want to paint his supporters as racist.

You see, Al and his ilk lack a self-awareness gene. This prevents them from accepting things that are painfully obvious to those who don't have this defect.

[Irongrip400]

When most hear alt-right, they think of racists.

[Yamcha]

It's REALLY hard not to be seen as a racist these days if you are a straight, white male.

[Al Doggity]

How many threads have you posted about the "alt right"? LOL you know and I know that the "alt right" is a very small fraction of people who supported trump. The reason you keep bringing them up is b/c you want to paint his supporters as racist.

I have posted about the alt right in exactly one other thread   This thread  was in response to Elizabeth's stupid kneejerk defense of the alt right which she would later attempt to simultaneously walkback and continue to espouse.


Meanwhile, my entire previous post still stands. None of what you have claimed applies to any of my posts and, even if it did, what kind of twisted logic makes you think a voter majority makes someone think a policy is suddenly good? Idiot.  

[Irongrip400]

It's REALLY hard not to be seen as a racist these days if you are a straight, white male.

What news is that headline from? I think it's pretty silly.

[Yamcha]

What news is that headline from? I think it's pretty silly.

Take a wild guess

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/aeman-ansari/ethnic-safe-spaces_b_6897176.html

[Thin Lizzy]