Atheism Is Pure BS

[Tapeworm]

Zahra Elise

Despite the boy-do and the fact that I could probably fist her, shove my dick in, and then jerk myself off inside her with the hand that is inside her, she continues to impress me.

[Kwon]

Despite the boy-do and the fact that I could probably fist her, shove my dick in, and then jerk myself off inside her with the hand that is inside her, she continues to impress me.

Are you implying that her vag is as stretched out as Lil Billys theories about evolution?

[Tapeworm]

Are you implying that her vag is as stretched out as Lil Billys theories about evolution?

Sure would be fun finding out.

Would still rope myself to the doorknob tho.  Safety first.

[Little Billy]

Explain antibiotic resistance.

The bacteria remain bacteria; there is no evolution. While less resistant strains are eliminated by the medicine, the resistant strains that are already present multiply. So all that is going on is a change in constitution due to the antibiotic.

http://creation.com/superbugs-not-super-after-all

[Top Poodle]

The bacteria remain bacteria; there is no evolution. While less resistant strains are eliminated by the medicine, the resistant strains that are already present multiply. So all that is going on is a change in constitution due to the antibiotic.

http://creation.com/superbugs-not-super-after-all

Mutations, not even once?

"If in a population of 1000 bacteria you have one individual who possesses a mutation for antibiotic resistance, and you don't take antibiotics, then there's no advantage to that mutation. The mutation won't be selected for, so it won't become more common. Furthermore, muller's ratchet tells us that genes are deleted in asexual populations, because genes have a cost to produce and maintain, so losing the weight of neutral genes is actually advantageous. Antibiotic resistance could be selected against if antibiotics are absent from the environment."

[Little Billy]

No, I swear to god, I don't understand you.  Part of me thinks you're a superb troll, another part thinks you're a gifted idiot, and no part takes you seriously.

If your son is shorter than you, his son shorter than him, his son shorter than him, so on and so forth, and that trait keeps getting passed down, people are shrinking, ten thousand years from now what will your descendants look like?

No other conflation going on.

Not every change equates to evolution, which relates to transmutations and development. People begetting people hence does not qualify as evolution. Monkey populations gradually becoming men does, but genetic rules preclude such an occurrence. The theory of evolution posits that your ancestors were fish and reptiles - do you know why science says this is impossible?

[Top Poodle]

Not every change equates to evolution, which relates to transmutations and development. People begetting people hence does not qualify as evolution. Monkey populations gradually becoming men does, but genetic rules preclude such an occurrence. The theory of evolution posits that your ancestors were fish and reptiles - do you know why science says this is impossible?

Tell me, I'm trembling with excitement.

[Little Billy]

Tell me, I'm trembling with excitement.

The answer is in the very last statement before the question. Creatures only reproduce their own kind; your fathers were therefore exclusively human.

[Ropo]

The bacteria remain bacteria; there is no evolution. While less resistant strains are eliminated by the medicine, the resistant strains that are already present multiply. So all that is going on is a change in constitution due to the antibiotic.

http://creation.com/superbugs-not-super-after-all

And exactly how you can tell that bacteria of present time can't be new breed of dinosaur at 5 billion years from now? You see, there was quite few living things on this planet ~5 billion years ago, and look at it now?

[Ropo]

Not every change equates to evolution, which relates to transmutations and development. People begetting people hence does not qualify as evolution. Monkey populations gradually becoming men does, but genetic rules preclude such an occurrence. The theory of evolution posits that your ancestors were fish and reptiles - do you know why science says this is impossible?

What part of science, exactly? Of course you have a link?

[Top Poodle]

What part of science, exactly? Of course you have a link?

He's very convinced in his stance, but it's based on flawed conjecture.

[Top Poodle]

What part of science, exactly? Of course you have a link?

I'd assume he says the part where you can't witness a human give birth to a fish in real time.

 

[Little Billy]

What part of science, exactly? Of course you have a link?

All of science. Run a Google search on monkey reproduction or human reproduction. Monkeys beget only monkeys, and only humans beget humans.

[Top Poodle]

All of science. Run a Google search on monkey reproduction or human reproduction. Monkeys beget only monkeys, and only humans beget humans.

Ahh, see, I was right!

[Top Poodle]

All of science. Run a Google search on monkey reproduction or human reproduction. Monkeys beget only monkeys, and only humans beget humans.

The same google search tells me evolution is real.

what do

[Little Billy]

The same google search tells me evolution is real.

what do

It also tells you that Harry Potter is real. Learn to discern fact from fiction.

[Top Poodle]

It also tells you that Harry Potter is real. Learn to discern fact from fiction.

...it doesn't tell me harry potter is real.

[Ropo]

All of science. Run a Google search on monkey reproduction or human reproduction. Monkeys beget only monkeys, and only humans beget humans.

And as always, we have to take your word for it? That is the difference between beliefs and facts: You can prove facts. Your mistake is in the idea that homo sapiens somehow stop to be an ape. Just look your fellow citizens when lights goes out and looting starts. What you see is a prominent type of behavior which comes straight from the spinal cord