Bannon Predicts Trump Will Net 400 Electoral Votes in 2020

[Dos Equis]

Wait.  How can this happen if Trump's cabinet removes him from office??

Bannon Predicts Trump Will Net 400 Electoral Votes in 2020
By Sandy Fitzgerald   |   Saturday, 14 Oct 2017

President Donald Trump will win reelection with 400 electoral votes in 2020, his former chief strategist Steve Bannon declared Saturday in a reversal of reports claiming that he'd said the president had just a 30 percent chance of finishing out his first term.

"The populist, nationalist, conservative revolt that's going on, that drove Donald Trump to victory, that drove Judge [Roy] Moore to victory, that will drive 15 candidates to victory in 2018," Bannon, now the executive chairman of Breitbart News told an audience at the Values Voter Summit in Washington, reports The Hill.

Vanity Fair, however, quoting an anonymous source, said that Bannon had commented several months ago that the president has just a 30 percent chance of finishing his term. Further, the source claimed that Trump does not know the function of the 25th Amendment, which gives a president's Cabinet the right to vote for him to be removed from office, if a majority of its officials agree.

"I hate to break it to Graydon Carter and the good folks at Vanity Fair, but yes, President Trump is not only going to finish this term, he's going to win with 400 electoral votes in 2020," Bannon declared Saturday.

Bannon also said Saturday that he will eventually get back to fighting Democrats, but as for now, "it's a season of war against the GOP establishment."

On Monday, Bannon told Fox News' Sean Hannity that there is a "coalition coming together that is going to challenge every Republican incumbent except for Ted Cruz."

Bannon, going against Trump and congressional Republicans, rallied for former Judge Roy Moore in Alabama's Senate GOP runoff race over Sen. Luther Strange, who Trump had supported.

In 2016, Trump won 304 electoral votes, and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton netted 227.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/bannon-electoral-votes-trump/2017/10/14/id/819710/

[polychronopolous]

I think we could be looking at 1972 all over again but with a slightly different twist.

The DNC will try to put up a "centrist figure" like a Kamala Harris. She is a complete corporatist sell out and also helped to lock up massive amounts of black males as California Attorney General BUT she does have that ethnic look which the mainstream media could very well put their multi million dollar spin machine behind in an attempt to sell to the American public.

I say she is "centrist" but she probably is about as close to that as they can get unless they inject Hillary with all kinds of drugs and prop her up as a candidate again.

The most probable is a stammering, non charismatic toad like Keith Ellison who inspires nobody but the most fringe elements to come out or an 80 year old Bernie Sanders who would get embarrassed on mic by Trump during the debates.

I don't know if 400 is a solid prediction but I would certainly say mid to high 300's. The Democrats probably own California for the next 30 to 40 years so we must weigh that into the equation as well.

United States presidential election, 1972
Nominee   Richard Nixon   George McGovern
Party   Republican   Democratic
Home state   California   South Dakota
Running mate   Spiro Agnew   Sargent Shriver (replacing Thomas Eagleton)
Electoral vote   520   17

[Primemuscle]

Wait.  How can this happen if Trump's cabinet removes him from office??

Bannon Predicts Trump Will Net 400 Electoral Votes in 2020
By Sandy Fitzgerald   |   Saturday, 14 Oct 2017

President Donald Trump will win reelection with 400 electoral votes in 2020, his former chief strategist Steve Bannon declared Saturday in a reversal of reports claiming that he'd said the president had just a 30 percent chance of finishing out his first term.

"The populist, nationalist, conservative revolt that's going on, that drove Donald Trump to victory, that drove Judge [Roy] Moore to victory, that will drive 15 candidates to victory in 2018," Bannon, now the executive chairman of Breitbart News told an audience at the Values Voter Summit in Washington, reports The Hill.

Vanity Fair, however, quoting an anonymous source, said that Bannon had commented several months ago that the president has just a 30 percent chance of finishing his term. Further, the source claimed that Trump does not know the function of the 25th Amendment, which gives a president's Cabinet the right to vote for him to be removed from office, if a majority of its officials agree.

"I hate to break it to Graydon Carter and the good folks at Vanity Fair, but yes, President Trump is not only going to finish this term, he's going to win with 400 electoral votes in 2020," Bannon declared Saturday.

Bannon also said Saturday that he will eventually get back to fighting Democrats, but as for now, "it's a season of war against the GOP establishment."

On Monday, Bannon told Fox News' Sean Hannity that there is a "coalition coming together that is going to challenge every Republican incumbent except for Ted Cruz."

Bannon, going against Trump and congressional Republicans, rallied for former Judge Roy Moore in Alabama's Senate GOP runoff race over Sen. Luther Strange, who Trump had supported.

In 2016, Trump won 304 electoral votes, and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton netted 227.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/bannon-electoral-votes-trump/2017/10/14/id/819710/

Predictions are nothing more than a crap shoot.

[polychronopolous]

Predictions are nothing more than a crap shoot.

What a stupid statement.

[Dos Equis]

I think we could be looking at 1972 all over again but with a slightly different twist.

The DNC will try to put up a "centrist figure" like a Kamala Harris. She is a complete corporatist sell out and also helped to lock up massive amounts of black males as California Attorney General BUT she does have that ethnic look which the mainstream media could very well put their multi million dollar spin machine behind in an attempt to sell to the American public.

I say she is "centrist" but she probably is about as close to that as they can get unless they inject Hillary with all kinds of drugs and prop her up as a candidate again.

The most probable is a stammering, non charismatic toad like Keith Ellison who inspires nobody but the most fringe elements to come out or an 80 year old Bernie Sanders who would get embarrassed on mic by Trump during the debates.

I don't know if 400 is a solid prediction but I would certainly say mid to high 300's. The Democrats probably own California for the next 30 to 40 years so we must weigh that into the equation as well.

United States presidential election, 1972
Nominee   Richard Nixon   George McGovern
Party   Republican   Democratic
Home state   California   South Dakota
Running mate   Spiro Agnew   Sargent Shriver (replacing Thomas Eagleton)
Electoral vote   520   17

Harris is about as far left as you can get. 

[polychronopolous]

Harris is about as far left as you can get. 

Do not under estimate the power of alternative media. ESPECIALLY if you extend this out from October of 2017 to a potential November 2020 Presidential Election. Alternative media will grow and legacy media will decline in influence.

If you want to get a really good glimpse of the current DNC corporate party and what they will be facing from the opposition grassroots "Bernie/Progressive" wing, The Jimmy Dore Show probably exemplifies the Very Real opposition they WILL face

Kamala Harris is already showing massive chinks in her armor concerning the progressive crowd.

The 2020 Nominee Fight within the Democrat Party is going to be an absolute slaughter house.

[Primemuscle]

What a stupid statement.

Really? Didn't practically everyone predict Hilary Clinton would win the election right up until the vote was being counted?

[Dos Equis]

Really? Didn't practically everyone predict Hilary Clinton would win the election right up until the vote was being counted?

Yes.  Except for poly.   

But to say they are a crap shoot is an overstatement.  Depends on who is making the prediction and how the prediction is supported.  Some are definitely more reliable than others. 

[polychronopolous]

If I had to take a wager, I would say the DNC will put up Kamala as their nominee, while the progressive wing counters with an 80 year old Bernie or maybe Elizabeth Warren.

I think the progressive wing ultimately prevails with Bernie or Warren or Ellison taking the 2020 Democrat nomination because that alternative media IS the future and these big conglomerates are struggling to hold on.

The alternative internet media is a growing monster that cannot be stopped.

People are cutting the cord in massive numbers.

CBS, NBC, ABC...their days of influence have vanished at such an incredible pace.

The Jimmy Dore's and The Young Turks will be the future influences of the Democrat Party and they will force the party far left.

Look at all the recent layoffs at Disney and ESPN. I just read where Comcast or one of those big companies are booting off Comedy Central.

That mainstream Democrat influence is going the way of the dinosaur and the far left will eventually take over the Democrat Party.

[polychronopolous]

Grab your popcorn because this will be straight up Civil War on full display within the Democrat Party.

This Progressive wing is dug in and they are not going to stand for another corporate, big money nominee shoved down their throat.

4:22 to 4:52

"So they are doubling down on this 'punch left' so they thought if they punched the Bernie progressives hard enough, if you just did enough smearing, that if they did that enough, that somehow they would come around and vote for you. Well it didn't work and it's not going to work again"

@5:42 - "No you are the corrupted motherfuckers who just gave this god damn country to a game show host, that's who you are"

[Primemuscle]

Grab your popcorn because this will be straight up Civil War on full display within the Democrat Party.

This Progressive wing is dug in and they are not going to stand for another corporate, big money nominee shoved down their throat.

4:22 to 4:52

"So they are doubling down on this 'punch left' so they thought if they punched the Bernie progressives hard enough, if you just did enough smearing, that if they did that enough, that somehow they would come around and vote for you. Well it didn't work and it's not going to work again"

@5:42 - "No you are the corrupted motherfuckers who just gave this god damn country to a game show host, that's who you are"

Why wait until 2020 to find out. The 2018 federal elections should be pretty interesting.

All 33 seats in Senate Class I will be up for election. Additionally, special elections may be held to fill vacancies in the other two Senate Classes.

All 435 voting seats in the United States House of Representatives will be up for election. Additionally, elections will be held to select the Delegate for the District of Columbia as well as the delegates from U.S. territories, with the exception of the Resident Commissioner of Puerto Rico, who serves a four-year term.

[Las Vegas]

Really? Didn't practically everyone predict Hilary Clinton would win the election right up until the vote was being counted?

No, DE hasn't claimed credit for his statements pre-election, but he saw the writing on the wall. 

My memory is good, usually, and I do recall that.  It caused a turning point for me.

[Primemuscle]

No, DE hasn't claimed credit for his statements pre-election, but he saw the writing on the wall. 

My memory is good, usually, and I do recall that.  It caused a turning point for me.

I guess we all should listen to DE then. Forget about millions of others who were taken by surprise.

[Las Vegas]

This chick (Harris) is straight crazy.  Dangerous and unacceptable as a politician.

[Las Vegas]

I guess we all should listen to DE then. Forget about millions of others who were taken by surprise.

Depends if you want the truth or you'd prefer delusion, I suppose.  

Who was right?

[Las Vegas]

^ btw, I point that out only to say there's a difference between someone who was on board with Trump from the first moment, and someone who remained measured.  When the measured one comments, it has more meaning.  That's all.

[polychronopolous]

Why wait until 2020 to find out. The 2018 federal elections should be pretty interesting.

All 33 seats in Senate Class I will be up for election. Additionally, special elections may be held to fill vacancies in the other two Senate Classes.

All 435 voting seats in the United States House of Representatives will be up for election. Additionally, elections will be held to select the Delegate for the District of Columbia as well as the delegates from U.S. territories, with the exception of the Resident Commissioner of Puerto Rico, who serves a four-year term.

C'mon Prime, it's a political board. Conversing about these topics is what we do.

I'm not trying to ruffle any feathers. Just wanting to have a healthy discussion.

[Primemuscle]

C'mon Prime, it's a political board. Conversing about these topics is what we do.

I'm not trying to ruffle any feathers. Just wanting to have a healthy discussion.

Good, because there is nothing in my post to suggest otherwise. Everything I post is open to discussion. It is never case closed. At my age most people have witnessed enough to know that it is impossible to predict the future successfully 100% of the time.

[Soul Crusher]

Good, because there is nothing in my post to suggest otherwise. Everything I post is open to discussion. It is never case closed. At my age most people have witnessed enough to know that it is impossible to predict the future successfully 100% of the time.

Democrats pick Kamala Harris or some other communist like Bernie who will be what in his 80's?  Trump is a sure winner. 

[Straw Man]

This is just another example of Bannon trying to suck his own cock

The Mooch warned us about this

[Moontrane]

I predict the 2020 Democratic presidential candidate will be a crystallization of the progressive female response to Trump’s election.  It’s fun to speculate which speculum squeezers will toss their pussy hats in the ring.  Conservatives who criticize them will be called sexist, and if the subject of criticism is Kamala Harris, they’ll also be labeled as racist.