And he paid her off immediately after the event. She didn't come back after nearly 10 years and start accusing him of something out of the blue once the wire transfers from South America stopped coming through every month. What makes all these historical accusations threadbare and doubtful is the long periods of time elapsed between the alleged offense and the 'victim' coming forward. The best the Left can do is claim victims keep this type of things to themselves - but why? They can never explain that. Add in a huge payoff and her story borders on the absurd.
Read the facts of the case.
This chick didn't leak the story. A German newspaper did. In Ronaldo's testimony he said the woman said stop and no several times. This isn't the chick coming out of the woodwork. This is the press leaking information.
If the LAW says that she can't sue because to much time has passed/statute of limitations, lack of evidence or because she signed a NDA so be it. But if the LAW says there is evidence so be it.
There's a number of reasons why these things are kept to themselves. A primary reason is people don't believe their story and slut shame them, look no further than the Kobe case. His lawyer name dropped the victim several times in the hearing (where the judge threatened to hold her in contempt of court for doing so, but never acted on it) releasing her name to the public and setting loose that firestorm.
I'm with you dude, if a woman is found guilty of lying there needs to be repercussions. But if a person raped another person it should be investigated.
What about her story sounds absurd?
