Take a guy who has a Bruce Lee physique (around 135lbs) and is ripped to the bone. He is small but looks very impressive with his shirt off. He goes on a bulk diet and gains 35 lbs up to 170. Now he is still small but is skinny fat and looks like shit. If he would have trained and gained just 5 lbs of muscle he would have been better off plus he never has to diet and lose weight.
Few, if any here, admire Bruce Lee's physique (this site is called
GETBIG, not Get-Twig). They admire him because he could fight.
Who is going to continue training for years on end, when he goes from 135 lbs to 140 lbs in a year? All he's done is go from being a twig to being a slightly less smaller twig. I know that firsthand, having started training at 136, in June of 1989.
Yup,added bodyweight doesn`t necesarilly mean you gained any muscle.
You know if you've gained muscle when your strength goes up and you get the compliments from your friends and family.
Nobody puts on pure muscle all the time. Again, there's a fine line between putting on too much fat and limiting yourself to minuscule gains, out of obsession with being super-lean all the time.
The first time I broke 200-lb, I felt great and my classmates (and a few ladies) noticed my improvements. NOBODY accused me of being fat, and I certainly looked better than I did at 175, even if I wasn't quite as cut.
That's the old myth of bulking up and slimming down. The bulker thinks they have actually a bunch of muscle along with the fat and then they can just lose the fat and the muscle remains. Nice theory but it's bullshit.
Harldy! Ronnie, Dorian, and other mass monsters that have been revered on this forum (and others) were all three bills and change in their respective off-seasons.