Author Topic: Synthol vs. Esiclene  (Read 9877 times)

littleguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4183
Synthol vs. Esiclene
« on: March 13, 2006, 07:45:05 AM »
Now I personally know people that have used Esiclene and have only seen/heard the stories of Synthol. Even though Esiclene may be harder to get why isnt there a greater use than Synthol? Granted it is only temporary gains but in my mind, if I fu$k up with Esiclene I know it is only temporary where with Synthol, although not permanent it is definitely longer lasting and more noticeable....

Esiclene has some very unusual characteristics. It will allow any muscle to increase in size within a very short period of time. Basically esiclene stimulates the tissue at the point of injection causing a slightly painful inflammation and swelling of the muscle tissue itself. Because inflammation is normally painful esiclene ampules usually contain 20mg lidocaine, a mild painkiller. The swelling only lasts for about four to five days making this a popular right-before-competition drug to help size-up the under developed muscle groups. Esiclene is often injected daily to make up for the decrease in swelling. Esiclene only promises temporary gains of around 1-1.5 in on arms and calves when used daily at injections of around 1ml the first day and 2ml (one per muscle) the days following. It is difficult to find on the black market, however, it is very affordable.

Synthol is used to enhance or augment a weak or lagging bodypart. The muscles that respond best are the small, rounder, muscle groups such as the biceps, triceps, and calves. Usually, 3cc amounts of Synthol are placed DEEP into the muscles 2-4 times per week for the first 3-4 weeks. Thereafter, 3cc amounts are injected on a once per week basis for the next 20-24 weeks until the size increase has become permanent

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: Synthol vs. Esiclene
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2006, 08:53:22 AM »
I agree totally,  Flex wrote in one of his columns that him and Kevin Levrone would basically fight each other to get their dealer's last case of esiclene before a show. This was in one of his expose columns regarding bodybuilding, maybe a year and a half back in MD.

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Synthol vs. Esiclene
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2006, 09:16:10 AM »
i know a guy who won the MD. and is friends with Kevin.  He said that Kevin practically lived on esiclene.  he said he put it in his arms, delts and even had 2 people do each side of his back with it.  who knows. 
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: Synthol vs. Esiclene
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2006, 09:36:31 AM »
Flex said pretty much the same about Kevin in his column, he also added that Esiclene made the person very sleepy and he would often pass out with the needle still inside him while he was shooting it all over the place. His wife would have to come and pull it out.

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20511
  • Biscuit
Re: Synthol vs. Esiclene
« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2006, 09:40:48 AM »
I agree totally,  Flex wrote in one of his columns that him and Kevin Levrone would basically fight each other to get their dealer's last case of esiclene before a show. This was in one of his expose columns regarding bodybuilding, maybe a year and a half back in MD.


Sort of... but not really. As one of the guys (Tom & Max?)who made the deals, I can report that the transactions were generally peaceful & beneficial to all parties. ;D
a

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: Synthol vs. Esiclene
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2006, 09:16:32 AM »
Sort of... but not really. As one of the guys (Tom & Max?)who made the deals, I can report that the transactions were generally peaceful & beneficial to all parties. ;D

LOL, that wasn't meant to be taken literally.

monster triceps

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 436
  • RIP slobby :(
Re: Synthol vs. Esiclene
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2006, 09:17:30 AM »
They still make Esiclene but it's costly & hard to come by.
young niggah greedy

arce377

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2551
  • ARCE DO SAN MARTIALARTS SCHOOL
Re: Synthol vs. Esiclene
« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2006, 07:11:45 PM »
no wonder kevin was always so blown (and swollen) up!!!!!!!!!
ARCE
DOSAN DOJO

Wombat

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2873
  • Your name tattooed to my ass!
Re: Synthol vs. Esiclene
« Reply #8 on: March 14, 2006, 09:32:13 PM »
Arnold reportedly loved the stuff also...Kevin was a no brainer...

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794
Re: Synthol vs. Esiclene
« Reply #9 on: December 11, 2019, 11:02:15 PM »
 :D


Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: Synthol vs. Esiclene
« Reply #10 on: December 12, 2019, 12:16:55 PM »
Now I personally know people that have used Esiclene and have only seen/heard the stories of Synthol. Even though Esiclene may be harder to get why isnt there a greater use than Synthol? Granted it is only temporary gains but in my mind, if I fu$k up with Esiclene I know it is only temporary where with Synthol, although not permanent it is definitely longer lasting and more noticeable....

Esiclene has some very unusual characteristics. It will allow any muscle to increase in size within a very short period of time. Basically esiclene stimulates the tissue at the point of injection causing a slightly painful inflammation and swelling of the muscle tissue itself. Because inflammation is normally painful esiclene ampules usually contain 20mg lidocaine, a mild painkiller. The swelling only lasts for about four to five days making this a popular right-before-competition drug to help size-up the under developed muscle groups. Esiclene is often injected daily to make up for the decrease in swelling. Esiclene only promises temporary gains of around 1-1.5 in on arms and calves when used daily at injections of around 1ml the first day and 2ml (one per muscle) the days following. It is difficult to find on the black market, however, it is very affordable.

Synthol is used to enhance or augment a weak or lagging bodypart. The muscles that respond best are the small, rounder, muscle groups such as the biceps, triceps, and calves. Usually, 3cc amounts of Synthol are placed DEEP into the muscles 2-4 times per week for the first 3-4 weeks. Thereafter, 3cc amounts are injected on a once per week basis for the next 20-24 weeks until the size increase has become permanent

Of course, if you say so...but wait a minute...: "Esiclene is also known as Formebolone, and it is a water-based steroid. " - https://www.streetdirectory.com/etoday/all-sizzle-and-no-steakanbolic-compound-esiclene-upfwau.html

"synthol is a blend of three ingredients ? 85% oil (usually medium chain triglycerides), 7.5% lidocaine (local anesthetic/painkiller), and 7.5% benzyl alcohol (disinfectant/sterilizer). " - https://www.tigerfitness.com/blogs/motivation/synthol-oil-muscle-site-enhancement-seos

It is always nice to see how people here has top notch knowledge to share  ;D

JAGO

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2750
  • Biden/Harris 2020
Re: Synthol vs. Esiclene
« Reply #11 on: December 12, 2019, 12:19:55 PM »
Esiclene - Do they even make this any longer?

J