Author Topic: Court Filing: Foreign Agents of Agressor Nations Had Access to US Voter Lists  (Read 959 times)


Methyl m1ke

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1595
What does that mean?

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Uhm, voter registration lists are public Joe.

Methyl m1ke

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1595
Uhm, voter registration lists are public Joe.

Hey its the buff math professor. Question- why/is the speed of light constant? Shouldnt it get slower as it runs out of energy? Say its not traveling in a vacuum and is being acted upon by gravity air etc shouldnt it slow down?

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61538
  • It’s All Bullshit
Uhm, voter registration lists are public Joe.

Maybe you missed this part

“Foreign Agents of Agressor Nations Had Access”

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32980
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Maybe you missed this part

“Foreign Agents of Agressor Nations Had Access”

As you know, this is all Trump needs to end this whole fiasco.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61538
  • It’s All Bullshit
As you know, this is all Trump needs to end this whole fiasco.

More traitors to this country than first expected and now you have Xi basically saying he can’t wait to work with Biden again. If Biden gets in, he’ll literally start destroying this country on day 1. He already has Obama 2.0 (and worse) picked for his cabinet


Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42303
Maybe you missed this part

“Foreign Agents of Agressor Nations Had Access”

Everyone with an internet connection has access to voter lists, including Foreign Agents of Agressor Nations

Just for fun, if you are a registered voter, check it out. The information can be accessed via your county's website. How do you think canvassers know who to call or door knock to get out the vote? During an election, it is possible to see who already voted. This list is sometimes used by canvassers who don't want to spend time calling or door knocking on people who voted. It's one of the reasons, I send my ballot in the same day I receive it. It gets me off the call, mail and door knock lists.

In the county where I live the fee to get this information is $25.  https://www.clackamas.us/elections/pricelist.html

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Hey its the buff math professor.

Hey. *FLEXES*. ;D


Question- why/is the speed of light constant?

That depends on what you mean by "constant". It's not constant, in that it depends on the material through which light transits. It's why the submerged part of a pen looks "bent" and "disjointed": the speed of light changes abruptly at the interface of two materials.

But I presume that you're talking about the theoretical speed of light in a vaccum.


Shouldnt it get slower as it runs out of energy? Say its not traveling in a vacuum and is being acted upon by gravity air etc shouldnt it slow down?

"Runs out of energy" is not quite correct, but this is actually a great question. The answer is complex but hinges on the facts that photons can only ever travel at one speed: the speed of light, whatever that is through the medium they're transiting.

Of course that doesn't mean that light doesn't "lose" something as it travels. Let's talk about photons: at any point in their path, photons can either be affected or unaffected, but it doesn't result in light "slowing down" but rather in "less" light, as individual photons are scattered or, potentially, absorbed. So that's one thing. There's also the matter of luminance, or the "intensity" of light, which decreases proportionally to the square of the distance between the source and the observer, even in a vaccum, because as the distance increases so does the area, but the number of photons either remains constant or declines because of absorption or scattering.

Class is over. Time for turkey and rich, buttery mashed potatoes. Catabolic heaven! ;D

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Maybe you missed this part

“Foreign Agents of Agressor Nations Had Access”

Maybe you missed the part about voter registration lists being public: everyone has access to them, and it may surprise you to know that everyone really means everyone, even them darn forn'ers. Check out voterrecords.com which conveniently aggregates this information.

Here's Donald Trump: https://voterrecords.com/voters/Donald-J-Trump/1
Here's Lee Priest: https://voterrecords.com/voters/nv/lee+priest/1
Here's a guy named "Popeye": https://voterrecords.com/voter/83406742/popeye-mathis


P.S.: You misspelled "aggressor"

Methyl m1ke

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1595
Hey. *FLEXES*. ;D


That depends on what you mean by "constant". It's not constant, in that it depends on the material through which light transits. It's why the submerged part of a pen looks "bent" and "disjointed": the speed of light changes abruptly at the interface of two materials.

But I presume that you're talking about the theoretical speed of light in a vaccum.


"Runs out of energy" is not quite correct, but this is actually a great question. The answer is complex but hinges on the facts that photons can only ever travel at one speed: the speed of light, whatever that is through the medium they're transiting.

Of course that doesn't mean that light doesn't "lose" something as it travels. Let's talk about photons: at any point in their path, photons can either be affected or unaffected, but it doesn't result in light "slowing down" but rather in "less" light, as individual photons are scattered or, potentially, absorbed. So that's one thing. There's also the matter of luminance, or the "intensity" of light, which decreases proportionally to the square of the distance between the source and the observer, even in a vaccum, because as the distance increases so does the area, but the number of photons either remains constant or declines because of absorption or scattering.

Class is over. Time for turkey and rich, buttery mashed potatoes. Catabolic heaven! ;D

Thank you very much! And Happy Thanksgiving  :)

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61538
  • It’s All Bullshit
Maybe you missed the part about voter registration lists being public: everyone has access to them, and it may surprise you to know that everyone really means everyone, even them darn forn'ers. Check out voterrecords.com which conveniently aggregates this information.

Here's Donald Trump: https://voterrecords.com/voters/Donald-J-Trump/1
Here's Lee Priest: https://voterrecords.com/voters/nv/lee+priest/1
Here's a guy named "Popeye": https://voterrecords.com/voter/83406742/popeye-mathis


P.S.: You misspelled "aggressor"

You should be on Trumps or Powell’s legal team. I’m sure they could use your expert legal expertise and point out their misspellings and of course your vast legal knowledge which sounds like is light years beyond theirs 🙄

Maybe Biden thinks he won just by the use of common core 🤦‍♂️

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
You should be on Trumps or Powell’s legal team. I’m sure they could use your expert legal expertise and point out their misspellings and of course your vast legal knowledge which sounds like is light years beyond theirs 🙄

You posted about “foreign agressor nations” having “access to US voter lists”. Voter lists are PUBLIC so to claim that “foreign agressor nations had access” to them is a vacuous claim. So you and whoever made the claim you’re regurgitating are confused about what “public” means or about the basics of the electoral systems.

As for being a part of Trump’s or Powell’s legal teams, I’ll pass. I don’t really believe Trump’s outlandish claims, so I couldn’t really be an effective advocate. And as for Powell’s team, well, I’m not really interested in working at the circus.


Maybe Biden thinks he won just by the use of common core 🤦‍♂️

Nah, I’m pretty sure he thinks  he won by having received enough votes in each of several States to ensure that he has a majority of the electors.

It’s unfortunate really because the only thing that would be more amusing to me than Trump not winning would be Joe Biden losing. But you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61538
  • It’s All Bullshit
You posted about “foreign agressor nations” having “access to US voter lists”. Voter lists are PUBLIC so to claim that “foreign agressor nations had access” to them is a vacuous claim. So you and whoever made the claim you’re regurgitating are confused about what “public” means or about the basics of the electoral systems.

As for being a part of Trump’s or Powell’s legal teams, I’ll pass. I don’t really believe Trump’s outlandish claims, so I couldn’t really be an effective advocate. And as for Powell’s team, well, I’m not really interested in working at the circus.


Nah, I’m pretty sure he thinks  he won by having received enough votes in each of several States to ensure that he has a majority of the electors.

It’s unfortunate really because the only thing that would be more amusing to me than Trump not winning would be Joe Biden losing. But you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

1. K...lol

2. With all of the hard evidence and the best attorneys in the country putting their Jeep’s on the line with what they have....you actually still think he won a legit election....again, K

This would be point where you put your higher education aside and just use some common sense.

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
1. K...lol

Do you dispute that voter lists are public information that are, as public information, readily available to anyone?


2. With all of the hard evidence and the best attorneys in the country putting their Jeep’s on the line with what they have....you actually still think he won a legit election....again, K

No, see, here's the thing: we've seen no hard evidence. In fact we've seen very little in the way of evidence, and what little we have was so laughable as to not even merit serious consideration.

And as for "best attorneys" forgive me but Rudy Giuliani is a senile, amoral crackpot and the "superstar" Sydney Powell has been unable to do much more that spout baseless and unsubstantiated accusations and the only thing she's unleashed was a poorly drafted complaint that has been universally treated as a joke.

But honestly, I can't wait for their next press conference at the Watergate, where all will be revealed. No, no, not the hotel! The bar in Berlin!


you actually still think he won a legit election....again, K

Yes, I do. I don't like Joe Biden and I wish he'd lost, but he didn't. As I said, the only thing more funny to me that Trump winning would have been Joe Biden losing.

But I don't, for a minute, believe the outlandish claims that Trump and co. are making. I don't buy the nonsense about HAMMER and SCORECARD (the brainchild of a serial fraudster). I don't buy the nonsense about Dominion Voting Systems. I don't buy the claims about boxes and boxes of fake ballots, or the tales of zombies rising up from the grave to vote.

If ANY ONE of those things was even remotely true, we'd have serious, hard and irrefutable evidence. But we don't. All we have are affidavits from people who say that they find it suspicious that members of the military voted for Biden or who attest that they felt other observers were too liberal.

Look, I get it. You're fucking gullible. You fell for the Obama birth certificate hoax too, and you and butted heads there too. You kept spouting nonsense and shifting the goalposts, pushing a theory so fucking ridiculous that it might as well have been "the moon is made of cheese."

It's precisely why you are so dangerous: because you don't think; you just do as you're told by your talk radio taskmasters without thinking about any of it critically.  Which leads us to the next part of your post:


This would be point where you put your higher education aside and just use some common sense.

See, here's the problem: you believe that "edumacation" somehow makes people dumber and that my years in academia, spent honing my critical and analytical skills, somehow hamper my ability to see things clearly.

Meanwhile, you're the one that's mindlessly reposting nonsense, regurgitating words that others spoke because you're unable to enunciate, of for that matter formulate, any of your own thoughts.

DooM_

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 716
and note the ad hominem attacks by the msm against giuliani , without looking at the arguments he presented . . . the same man who took down the mob in ny , and now the msm are launching a campaign to discredit him based on personal attacks on his looks instead of the arguments he has presented . . . ?

Methyl m1ke

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1595
and note the ad hominem attacks by the msm against giuliani , without looking at the arguments he presented . . . the same man who took down the mob in ny , and now the msm are launching a campaign to discredit him based on personal attacks on his looks instead of the arguments he has presented . . . ?

I voted for Trump and let me be the first to tell you I do not think Giuliani lends any credibility to Trumps position whatsoever. I personally think hes a total fraud. I watched a 20+ minute video where he claimed he was exposing Hunter Biden and his laptop yet all I saw was yet more and more speculation with zero hard proven factual data and worst of all every 8 minutes he had to spark a fucking cigar and spend 5 minutes pimping some retarded cigar shop. It was nauseating. The whole video was clickbait. Either Giuliani has Trump fooled or the two of them are both idiots and I voted for the wrong guy.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844